Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #71   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,756
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

That L'il Snot is such a natural born liar!
He just can't control himself.
  #72   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,476
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

On 11/14/2013 4:37 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 11/14/13, 4:34 PM, Charlemagne wrote:

Just for the record, I never threatened to send anybody to see harry...
I told a guy what harry called his daughter.. period. Just sayin' but we
can't expect don to tell the truth anyway... Remember, he's the one who
has said twice over the years he is coming to beat me up, and ran when
he had the chance.... so......


Your entire post immediately above is...entirely bull****. The cops came
to your house based upon specific threats you made. *They* took it
seriously.



And how would you know that? What was your involvement?
  #73   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:40:57 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

That L'il Snot is such a natural born liar!
He just can't control himself.


That is the kind of post one could call 'pandering'. They occur immediately after Krause makes a
derogatory comment, and then you follow with one of your own - seeking his approval, I reckon.

You are a much better man than that.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


  #74   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,006
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

On Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:20:10 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:40:57 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:



That L'il Snot is such a natural born liar!


He just can't control himself.




That is the kind of post one could call 'pandering'. They occur immediately after Krause makes a

derogatory comment, and then you follow with one of your own - seeking his approval, I reckon.



You are a much better man than that.


They strike me as a Yogi Bear and Boo-Boo act. And always wanting the free pic-a-nic basket. :-

  #76   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2013
Posts: 189
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

True North wrote:
On Thursday, 14 November 2013 09:29:46 UTC-4, Hank© wrote:
On 11/13/2013 11:00 PM, True North wrote:

L'il Snot was quick enough to threaten to send a "full patch biker" after you, but lays down for a deadbeat who might cost him thousands of dollars.
What's with that?



Are you talking about our resident deadbeat?

Of course...your one and only BFF, Scott Ingersoll...who else, silly?

Do you think he is in deeper than Harry?
  #77   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2013
Posts: 189
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

True North wrote:
Not to mention his delinquent credit card accounts.

Harry's late on CC payments, too? What next - his rent?
  #78   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

John H wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 13:40:57 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:

That L'il Snot is such a natural born liar!
He just can't control himself.


That is the kind of post one could call 'pandering'. They occur
immediately after Krause makes a
derogatory comment, and then you follow with one of your own - seeking
his approval, I reckon.

You are a much better man than that.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


Probably you are in error about his character.
  #79   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Barrack "Apologizes"

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 216674866406141698.116458bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 11/13/2013 7:34 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/13/2013 6:58 PM, Charlemagne wrote:
On 11/13/2013 6:36 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/13/2013 5:56 PM, Charlemagne wrote:



All of these scumbags come up with the first and last months rent..
Usually from an employer who has them under his thumb, then as soon as
they move in, the start playing games... It's bull**** that landlords
have to put up with it... Should be able to put the **** in the street,
especially when you have it in writing the tenant is intentionally
breaking the lease...



Sounds like you should consider selling the place and be done with it.



Yeah, looking more and more like that now... Tried to hold off till the
prices come back up some but not... the ****er is that we almost sold in
08 and would have doubled our money but we kept it so a "friend" could
move his family in as a favor to them... They were the first of four
that screwed us over so far....



Four in 5 years?



Yup... Tried references, everything... Keep getting total deadbeats.
This time we are going to let an agency rent it out, or just sell it...

There are people that are professional squatters! I know what you are
talking about. Had tenants that knew the laws very well, and used them
to their advantage.


Need a better court. Get with the local judges and work with them. At
Lake Tahoe, California side, takes 30 days or less to evict.


Uh, we owned rental property in CA, and that is horse****. You must give
the tenant a minimum of 30 to vacate once notified for failure to pay
rent. The rub is, if they've even paid a PORTION, that changes. Once
they don't vacate, you must file with the court. Service can take easily
three months or more, and then they can simply avoid service by not
answering the door. In some counties you even have to go through a court
hearing before they'll serve. THEN the tenant is given an opportunity to
respond. The tenant has to file in five days, but once he responds,
another two months or so goes by until the court sets a court date. Then
when that finally happens, and the court finds in the landlords favor,
in another month or two, the tenant is served the notice to vacate. By
this time you are in it for 6 or 8 months.


Not at Tahoe. The judge there hates deadbeats. Puts the case on the fast
track!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barrack "Apologizes" F.O.A.D. General 0 November 11th 13 12:50 PM
Barrack "Apologizes" Hank©[_3_] General 0 November 11th 13 12:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017