| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Having owned a Vivacity (built to Lloyds A100) on the Chesapeake Bay for
several years (1970's) I would recommend either a shallow fixed keel (Cal 20, D&M 22). Both have fixed keels, 3-feet deep, and are stiff and stable. The twin keel design places the keels slightly pin-toed so that your downwind performance is sort of bleak. Perhaps if you could find a Snapdragon 26 (also Lloyds A100) you would get better performance. The Vivacity had the keels glassed in and they were quite thick. If you run aground even slightly you do not rock a twin keel off the bottom. On the other hand you can put up enough sail to actually pull one of the keels out of the water on a Vivacity. If I can locate a photo of us doing it I'll put it on the web. My current D&M 22 does a fine job sailing the Key Largo area - inside when the ocean kicks up and outside when it 3 feet or less. Also check the mast and boom length on the twin keel. On the Vivacity the mast was very short and the boom very long. On the plus side, a twin keel doesn't need a cradle when you pull it out. Capt NJ Marinaro "John Smith" wrote in message ... Neither. Twin Keel is the best choice. M. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| From swing keel to fixed keel | Boat Building | |||
| San Juan 21 swing keel problem | Boat Building | |||
| Swing keel / Lift keel | Cruising | |||
| Swing keel 25 | Cruising | |||