On 8/26/13 12:43 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:43:09 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:

======



A statistical sample of exactly *two*.



In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South

Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might

have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as

loud, disruptive or belligerent behavior. It is inappropriate to play

the race card without knowing the facts.

Absolutely right, Wayne. But Harry didn't present the article with that thought in mind.



Heheh. Right, if it were a group of 25 white folks, the patron who
complained would have still complained. Sure.

On 8/25/2013 10:43 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 15:12:08 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 4:32:10 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:

The manager and the patron.


And they represent the entire state of S.Carolina?

wow...

======

A statistical sample of exactly *two*.

In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South
Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might
have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as
loud, disruptive or beligerant behavior. It is inappropriate to play
the race card without knowing the facts.


Without reservations, making seating arrangements for a group of 25
during a busy time could disrupt a small restaurant's operation for the
entire period. Not to mention the loss of revenue while attempting to
rearrange the dining room to accommodate a party of 25.

I didn't look at the story closely, since it emanated from YKW, a known
thief and liar. Typically, the only thing you learn from one of Harry's
insane trolls is that Harry is truly insane.

On 8/26/2013 12:43 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:43:09 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:

======



A statistical sample of exactly *two*.



In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South

Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might

have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as

loud, disruptive or belligerent behavior. It is inappropriate to play

the race card without knowing the facts.

Absolutely right, Wayne. But Harry didn't present the article with that thought in mind.

Troll- yes. Implying the manager is racist- yes. Implying the state
is racist- yes. Implying that most of the southern states are racist-
yes. Demonstrating to the newsgroup that Harry is still bat**** crazy-
yes.
Have I overlooked anything, Tim?

On 8/26/2013 6:42 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/26/13 12:43 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:43:09 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:

======



A statistical sample of exactly *two*.



In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South

Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might

have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as

loud, disruptive or belligerent behavior. It is inappropriate to play

the race card without knowing the facts.

Absolutely right, Wayne. But Harry didn't present the article with
that thought in mind.



Heheh. Right, if it were a group of 25 white folks, the patron who
complained would have still complained. Sure.

That should set Tim straight. ;-)

On Monday, August 26, 2013 6:19:02 AM UTC-5, Hank© wrote:
On 8/26/2013 12:43 AM, Tim wrote:

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:43:09 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:



======







A statistical sample of exactly *two*.







In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South



Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might



have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as



loud, disruptive or belligerent behavior. It is inappropriate to play



the race card without knowing the facts.



Absolutely right, Wayne. But Harry didn't present the article with that thought in mind.



Troll- yes. Implying the manager is racist- yes. Implying the state

is racist- yes. Implying that most of the southern states are racist-

yes. Demonstrating to the newsgroup that Harry is still bat**** crazy-

yes.

Have I overlooked anything, Tim?

Yes, come to think of it. The entire continent is racist seeing S. Carolina is attached in there...somewhere.

On 8/26/2013 7:58 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, August 26, 2013 6:19:02 AM UTC-5, Hank© wrote:
On 8/26/2013 12:43 AM, Tim wrote:

On Sunday, August 25, 2013 9:43:09 PM UTC-5, Wayne B wrote:



======







A statistical sample of exactly *two*.







In all fairness to the manager, not to mention the people of South



Carolina, we don't really know all that transpired here. There might



have been perfectly valid reasons for refusing them service such as



loud, disruptive or belligerent behavior. It is inappropriate to play



the race card without knowing the facts.



Absolutely right, Wayne. But Harry didn't present the article with that thought in mind.



Troll- yes. Implying the manager is racist- yes. Implying the state

is racist- yes. Implying that most of the southern states are racist-

yes. Demonstrating to the newsgroup that Harry is still bat**** crazy-

yes.

Have I overlooked anything, Tim?

Yes, come to think of it. The entire continent is racist seeing S. Carolina is attached in there...somewhere.


Excellent point. Maybe that's why Harry hates the good old U.S.A.,
Canada, and Mexico.