|
Do I need this?
Beautiful gun. Nice price.
http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! |
Do I need this?
Wait until they come out with a 'pink' version.
That would suit you to a 'T'. |
Do I need this?
True North wrote:
Wait until they come out with a 'pink' version. That would suit you to a 'T'. Whatever toy he is thinking of buying, Herring should consider spending his money on something that right wing extremists racists don't have: empathy. |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote:
Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! For that price? YES! |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/13 6:43 PM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. -- Hope you're having a great day! For that price? YES! Oh, another gun. Just what our newsgroup right-wing racist needs. I was hoping he was going to buy some compassion or empathy pills, which is what he really needs. |
Do I need this?
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. Sounds pretty good to me. |
Do I need this?
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. Sounds pretty good to me. --------------------- Of course. I can understand the reasoning of some, but not all of the proposed law changes. To my knowledge, MA would be the first state to require liability insurance to own a firearm, if approved. Doesn't make sense to me. How does having liability insurance make gun ownership safer to the general public? Basically, it says, "If I am negligent and you get hurt or killed, don't worry ... I am insured." Some of the others are just plain dumb and for effect only. Private sales are already required to be electronically filed here. You do it on-line and the state has a record of the transaction. Why do we now have to pay a fee to a licensed dealer to record a private sale? What set this off in my mind was doing some research for a friend of mine. His wife just purchased a pre-ban Clock. Came with two, eleven round magazines. Under the proposed legislation, pre-ban mags of 10 rounds or less will be allowed. Post ban magazines are currently limited to seven rounds. If approved, she is legally obligated to transfer her 11 round mags out of state or prove that they have been destroyed by some form of not yet disclosed procedure. |
Do I need this?
Too bad it wasn't a national initiative and enforced in all the states.
|
Do I need this?
On 8/22/13 8:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. Sounds pretty good to me. --------------------- Of course. I can understand the reasoning of some, but not all of the proposed law changes. To my knowledge, MA would be the first state to require liability insurance to own a firearm, if approved. Doesn't make sense to me. How does having liability insurance make gun ownership safer to the general public? Basically, it says, "If I am negligent and you get hurt or killed, don't worry ... I am insured." Some of the others are just plain dumb and for effect only. Private sales are already required to be electronically filed here. You do it on-line and the state has a record of the transaction. Why do we now have to pay a fee to a licensed dealer to record a private sale? What set this off in my mind was doing some research for a friend of mine. His wife just purchased a pre-ban Clock. Came with two, eleven round magazines. Under the proposed legislation, pre-ban mags of 10 rounds or less will be allowed. Post ban magazines are currently limited to seven rounds. If approved, she is legally obligated to transfer her 11 round mags out of state or prove that they have been destroyed by some form of not yet disclosed procedure. Liability insurance may mean that those who are shot by guns owned by people with coverage may be entitled to some sort of compensation. That seems reasonable. |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:29:08 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Wait until they come out with a 'pink' version. That would suit you to a 'T'. Just like Cockhole Donnies Pink Butt Plug !!!! |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:07:03 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Oh, another gun. Just what our newsgroup right-wing racist needs. I was hoping he was going to buy some compassion or empathy pills, which is what he really needs. Harry is becoming so stupid, he doesn't realize that NO ONE is reading ANYTHING of his.....LOL |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:05:05 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
Too bad it wasn't a national initiative and enforced in all the states. Too bad your stupidity wasn't regulated...we'd be better off. |
Do I need this?
There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again.
There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. |
Do I need this?
|
Do I need this?
wrote in message ... I imagine all of the provisions demanding that people "dispose of" already legally owned property will not survive a court challenge unless the state is willing to provide just compensation. It has been determined that banning something that was previously legal is a "Taking" ------------------------------ Obviously, you have never lived in Massachusetts. |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:15:59 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. Oh there is....Halifax Nova Scotia. Too bad you'll get the bad end of the stick, ****. |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:15:59 PM UTC-4, True North wrote:
There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. And your poor Wife will witness it all........ |
Do I need this?
"True North" wrote in message ... There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. ---------------------- I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever shows up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him. Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic comments. Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply eggs his demented mind on. |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 11:19:40 PM UTC-4, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Responding to him simply eggs his demented mind on. Sorry, but my "demented mind" as you call it, works on its own. Donnie is a marked man And you, luddite, are just another asswipe sock-puppet. |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all, those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution... |
Do I need this?
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:29:51 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. I'm sure the criminal element is paying close attention, Richard... |
Do I need this?
"JustWaitAFrekinMinute" wrote in message ... On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all, those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution... ------------------------------------- It's not the police departments looking for these "enhanced" laws. They are the brainchild of Patrick Deval and a group of anti-gun advocates. |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/13 10:01 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:24:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 8/22/13 9:18 PM, wrote: On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:20:29 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: Liability insurance may mean that those who are shot by guns owned by people with coverage may be entitled to some sort of compensation. That seems reasonable. Paid for by everyone, even those who don't own guns. That is what insurance is. Now there's an idea...force gun owners to get liability insurance and then let everyone who isn't a gun owner know they are subsidizing the gun owners. Liability Insurance is just a way to make lawyers rich. It figures you want more of it. Maybe we should tell everyone who pays for liability insurance that lawyers get a third to a half of all claims for basically doing nothing but driving up the amount of the claim. That does not include the money the insurance company lawyer gets, effectively making the cost of the claim about 3-4 times as much as the injured party ends up with., Now get out your checkbook and pay that insurance bill, sucker. Uh huh. So I suppose you don't have liability insurance on your car or homeowners insurance in case someone is injured on your property, right? |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/13 11:19 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"True North" wrote in message ... There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. ---------------------- I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever shows up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him. Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic comments. Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply eggs his demented mind on. He seems to be the clone of where PsychoSnotty will be in a couple of years. |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/2013 11:19 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"True North" wrote in message ... There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. ---------------------- I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever shows up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him. Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic comments. Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply eggs his demented mind on. Donnie could also stop making the juvenile comments on each and ever post which draws slammer out. Note, slammer is only answering don's constant trolls... Just sayin'. |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/2013 8:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. Sounds pretty good to me. --------------------- Of course. I can understand the reasoning of some, but not all of the proposed law changes. To my knowledge, MA would be the first state to require liability insurance to own a firearm, if approved. Doesn't make sense to me. How does having liability insurance make gun ownership safer to the general public? Basically, it says, "If I am negligent and you get hurt or killed, don't worry ... I am insured." It is just another way to tax and track your guns... Some of the others are just plain dumb and for effect only. Private sales are already required to be electronically filed here. You do it on-line and the state has a record of the transaction. Why do we now have to pay a fee to a licensed dealer to record a private sale? What set this off in my mind was doing some research for a friend of mine. His wife just purchased a pre-ban Clock. Came with two, eleven round magazines. Under the proposed legislation, pre-ban mags of 10 rounds or less will be allowed. Post ban magazines are currently limited to seven rounds. If approved, she is legally obligated to transfer her 11 round mags out of state or prove that they have been destroyed by some form of not yet disclosed procedure. |
Do I need this?
On 8/23/13 12:24 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all, those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution... Actually, they weren't, but since you were not paying attention in school the few days you attended... |
Do I need this?
On 8/23/13 7:23 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/22/2013 11:19 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "True North" wrote in message ... There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. ---------------------- I hope you realize that the only reason the dip**** "slammer" ever shows up in this newsgroup is because you respond to him. Everyone else either has him filtered or simply ignore his pathetic comments. Do us a favor, will you? Ignore him. Responding to him simply eggs his demented mind on. Donnie could also stop making the juvenile comments on each and ever post which draws slammer out. Note, slammer is only answering don's constant trolls... Just sayin'. *You* are the ranking and also rank expert on juvenile comments here, ****head. |
Do I need this?
|
Do I need this?
In article , says...
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:59:27 -0400, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. That is a lot of gun to carry. Kimber does make a nice mini 9mm that my neighbor has. It is $1500 or so. I am looking at a couple of Sig's, P239 and P938, a Beretta Nano and the gun I have always wanted a Colt Mustang .380. |
Do I need this?
|
Do I need this?
|
Do I need this?
In article ,
says... On 8/22/2013 8:03 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 8/22/13 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. Sounds pretty good to me. --------------------- Of course. I can understand the reasoning of some, but not all of the proposed law changes. To my knowledge, MA would be the first state to require liability insurance to own a firearm, if approved. Doesn't make sense to me. How does having liability insurance make gun ownership safer to the general public? Basically, it says, "If I am negligent and you get hurt or killed, don't worry ... I am insured." It is just another way to tax and track your guns... Some of the others are just plain dumb and for effect only. Private sales are already required to be electronically filed here. You do it on-line and the state has a record of the transaction. Why do we now have to pay a fee to a licensed dealer to record a private sale? What set this off in my mind was doing some research for a friend of mine. His wife just purchased a pre-ban Clock. Came with two, eleven round magazines. Under the proposed legislation, pre-ban mags of 10 rounds or less will be allowed. Post ban magazines are currently limited to seven rounds. If approved, she is legally obligated to transfer her 11 round mags out of state or prove that they have been destroyed by some form of not yet disclosed procedure. Better pull that tinfoil hate tighter around your head...... Jawbone Scotty, the insane paranoid fool of rec.boats. |
Do I need this?
Isn't that sweet, L'il Snottie coming to the aid of Idiot Snottie.
|
Do I need this?
In article ,
says... On 8/22/2013 7:29 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:59:27 PM UTC-5, John H wrote: Beautiful gun. Nice price. http://tinyurl.com/ls8jvo5 John (Gun Nut) H. For that price? YES! ---------------------------- I really like some of the Kimber handguns although I've never fired one. Unfortunately, the people's republic of Massachusetts has determined that none of Kimber's models are worthy of being determined to be MA compliant and it's therefore not possible for to buy one, new or used. Meanwhile, mini-me (Patrick Duval, Governor) has sponsored proposed legislation to further limit what may be owned or done in MA with regard to firearms. Included in the proposed changes to MA General Laws a 1. Limit of one firearm purchase per resident, per month. The purchase of more than one firearm within a 30 day period will be a felony, punishable by 2.5 years in prison for the buyer. 2. Previously grandfathered magazine clips that hold 11 or more rounds (standard Glock mag) must be legally disposed of within one year. Only 7 round magazines will be permitted. 3. Require gun license applicants to disclose their mental health histories. 4. Prohibit assault style firearms from being stored in homes. 5. Ban all high-capacity ammunition magazines, grandfathered or new, including .22lr. 6. Require gun owners to purchase liability insurance. 7. Tighten access to high-powered rounds of ammunition. (whatever *that* means). 8. Mandate buyers to undergo background checks before purchasing weapons at gun shows. 9. Require private gun sales to occur at the business of a licensed dealer so that the sale can be tracked electronically. 10. Several more that create more "crimes" for owning a prohibited gun, prohibited magazine, prohibited kind of ammo, and anything else they can dream up and get passed. Status: The bill was filed in February, 2013 and is currently making the rounds through the various required hearings before going to the capital for a vote. I would expect nothing less from the police state of Mass, after all, those little police depts outside Boston and Worcester, north of the TPK, are exactly the kind of "government" the framers were thinking of when they wrote the Second Amendment into the Constitution... Local police have WAY too much power these days. Neil Boortz had a spot on reaction about this not long ago. |
Do I need this?
On 8/22/2013 9:15 PM, True North wrote:
There you go with those homosexuals fantasies again. There must be some place in St Thomas where you can work off your 'fustrations'. He could probably better work off those frustrations, if he has them, in Halifax, where there is an extraordinarily large homosexual population. |
Do I need this?
On 8/23/2013 7:55 AM, True North wrote:
Isn't that sweet, L'il Snottie coming to the aid of Idiot Snottie. This is why dick binned you... |
Do I need this?
On 8/23/13 8:32 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/23/2013 7:55 AM, True North wrote: Isn't that sweet, L'il Snottie coming to the aid of Idiot Snottie. This is why dick binned you... Because you and the other Snotty Scotty are soul brothers? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com