On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can
take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away?

===

Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much
drooling over those pictures.

On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can
take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away?

===

Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much
drooling over those pictures.

I'd mucc rather look at your photographs of natures wonders, than say,
Harry's post holes and coffee pots.

On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can
take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away?

===

Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much
drooling over those pictures.


This from harry krause... the one who stalked posters right here, to
their marina, and took pictures which eventually drove the posters from
the group? What a ****ing asshole...

On 8/2/13 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can
take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away?

===

Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much
drooling over those pictures.


Neither the photos nor the women were that good. But I'll bet they made
you almost remember when you last had a woodie.

On 8/2/13 8:21 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can
take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away?

===

Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much
drooling over those pictures.


This from harry krause... the one who stalked posters right here, to
their marina, and took pictures which eventually drove the posters from
the group? What a ****ing asshole...


Never happened, asshole.

On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content
working for crap wages.

===

Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids
and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After
unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job
with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going
down hill ever since.

On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:10:14 -0400, Hank©
wrote:

Can you
think of any other highly educated individual who would sit at his
keyboard for fifteen years and suffer the abuse that he absorbs on a
daily basis? He's quite a guy.

===

Because of his personality disorder he thrives on attention, any kind
of attention.

On 8/2/13 9:02 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content
working for crap wages.

===

Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids
and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After
unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job
with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going
down hill ever since.


Sure, w'hine, sure.

On 8/2/2013 8:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 8/2/13 8:21 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 8/2/2013 8:12 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 05:06:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Shouldn't you be out stalking half-naked women in bikinis so you can
take sneaky photos of them from a few hundred yards away?

===

Ideally yes. Don't strain your cardiovascular system too much
drooling over those pictures.


This from harry krause... the one who stalked posters right here, to
their marina, and took pictures which eventually drove the posters from
the group? What a ****ing asshole...


Never happened, asshole.

Yup, it sure did happen, asshat.

On 8/2/2013 9:02 AM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:31:40 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Right, because teachers in the early 1970s should have been content
working for crap wages.

===

Prior to the 70s teachers worked at the job because they loved kids
and loved teaching, and most of them were good at it. After
unionization, people began to look at teaching careers as a secure job
with decent pay and great benefits. The schools have been going
down hill ever since.


exactly