On 7/29/13 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:59:45 -0700, jps wrote:

Australia is always the poster child for gun control laws but the
reality is the trend line for murders did not change in any
perceptible way when they banned and confiscated most of the guns.
Certainly less people were killed by guns but they still found a way.

But no more mass murders, to date.

Mass killings are such an insignificant part of the murder rate that
they get lost in the noise, statistically. It is just what the TV
chooses to report.
They have a "Newtown" in the black community every week and it barely
makes the paper.
The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him. Then it is a national disaster.


"Everything is equal, and nothing is worse than anything else, so,
therefore, a white kid who busts into a school and kills 20 kids and a
few teachers, and a white kid who shoots up a movie theater and kills 12
people and wounds 70 others, and two white kids who shoot up a Colorado
school and kill 12 and shoot up 24 others, and so on and so forth, ad
nauseum, are the equivalent of our normal quota of daily murders, some
of which are committed by blacks, some by whites, and some by people of
other races, and therefore the mass murders should not be reported by
the TV news because, well, because virtually all the mass murders are
committed by whites and that makes us whitey racists look bad."

Got it.

On 7/29/13 5:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:02:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/29/13 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:59:45 -0700, jps wrote:

Australia is always the poster child for gun control laws but the
reality is the trend line for murders did not change in any
perceptible way when they banned and confiscated most of the guns.
Certainly less people were killed by guns but they still found a way.

But no more mass murders, to date.

Mass killings are such an insignificant part of the murder rate that
they get lost in the noise, statistically. It is just what the TV
chooses to report.
They have a "Newtown" in the black community every week and it barely
makes the paper.
The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him. Then it is a national disaster.


"Everything is equal, and nothing is worse than anything else, so,
therefore, a white kid who busts into a school and kills 20 kids and a
few teachers, and a white kid who shoots up a movie theater and kills 12
people and wounds 70 others, and two white kids who shoot up a Colorado
school and kill 12 and shoot up 24 others, and so on and so forth, ad
nauseum, are the equivalent of our normal quota of daily murders, some
of which are committed by blacks, some by whites, and some by people of
other races, and therefore the mass murders should not be reported by
the TV news because, well, because virtually all the mass murders are
committed by whites and that makes us whitey racists look bad."

Got it.

Your mass killers were black guys. (DC Sniper)
As soon as they were caught, that story just went away.


1. The DC snipers were serial killers, not mass killers.

2. The news about them stayed in the news for years.

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:44:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The DC snipers were serial killers, not mass killers.

===

The only difference is the rate of fire.

On 7/29/13 6:17 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:44:30 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

The DC snipers were serial killers, not mass killers.

===

The only difference is the rate of fire.


No, Wayne, that's not the only difference. The rate of fire has nothing
to do with the differentiation.

In article , says...

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:02:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 7/29/13 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:59:45 -0700, jps wrote:

Australia is always the poster child for gun control laws but the
reality is the trend line for murders did not change in any
perceptible way when they banned and confiscated most of the guns.
Certainly less people were killed by guns but they still found a way.

But no more mass murders, to date.

Mass killings are such an insignificant part of the murder rate that
they get lost in the noise, statistically. It is just what the TV
chooses to report.
They have a "Newtown" in the black community every week and it barely
makes the paper.
The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him. Then it is a national disaster.


"Everything is equal, and nothing is worse than anything else, so,
therefore, a white kid who busts into a school and kills 20 kids and a
few teachers, and a white kid who shoots up a movie theater and kills 12
people and wounds 70 others, and two white kids who shoot up a Colorado
school and kill 12 and shoot up 24 others, and so on and so forth, ad
nauseum, are the equivalent of our normal quota of daily murders, some
of which are committed by blacks, some by whites, and some by people of
other races, and therefore the mass murders should not be reported by
the TV news because, well, because virtually all the mass murders are
committed by whites and that makes us whitey racists look bad."

Got it.

Your mass killers were black guys. (DC Sniper)
As soon as they were caught, that story just went away.

The Islamic Terrorist angle was never fully vetted out due to it being two black guys and not
to black Muslim guys.

On 7/30/2013 12:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:13:17 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:02:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


Your mass killers were black guys. (DC Sniper)
As soon as they were caught, that story just went away.

The Islamic Terrorist angle was never fully vetted out due to it being two black guys and not
to black Muslim guys.

They went out of their way not to call this a hate crime or a
terrorist act. It was just 2 guys out for a drive who decided to
shoot 13 people.


That's like "the guy tripped and fell on a knife, six times"

In article ,
says...

On 7/30/2013 12:37 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:13:17 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:02:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:


Your mass killers were black guys. (DC Sniper)
As soon as they were caught, that story just went away.

The Islamic Terrorist angle was never fully vetted out due to it being two black guys and not
to black Muslim guys.

They went out of their way not to call this a hate crime or a
terrorist act. It was just 2 guys out for a drive who decided to
shoot 13 people.


That's like "the guy tripped and fell on a knife, six times"

You sure are good at criminal excuses. I'd guess practice makes
perfect....

On 7/29/2013 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:59:45 -0700, jps wrote:

Australia is always the poster child for gun control laws but the
reality is the trend line for murders did not change in any
perceptible way when they banned and confiscated most of the guns.
Certainly less people were killed by guns but they still found a way.

But no more mass murders, to date.

Mass killings are such an insignificant part of the murder rate that
they get lost in the noise, statistically. It is just what the TV
chooses to report.
They have a "Newtown" in the black community every week and it barely
makes the paper.
The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him. Then it is a national disaster.


You forgot one thing... Let me "fix" your statement..

The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him and the democratic party needs a huge distraction leading up to an
election. Then it is a national disaster.

There you go... I fixed it.

On 7/29/13 2:50 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/29/2013 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:59:45 -0700, jps wrote:

Australia is always the poster child for gun control laws but the
reality is the trend line for murders did not change in any
perceptible way when they banned and confiscated most of the guns.
Certainly less people were killed by guns but they still found a way.

But no more mass murders, to date.

Mass killings are such an insignificant part of the murder rate that
they get lost in the noise, statistically. It is just what the TV
chooses to report.
They have a "Newtown" in the black community every week and it barely
makes the paper.
The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him. Then it is a national disaster.


You forgot one thing... Let me "fix" your statement..

The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him and the democratic party needs a huge distraction leading up to an
election. Then it is a national disaster.

There you go... I fixed it.


And once again, you prove you don't know anything about anything.

How's your homegrown racing doing this season

In article ,
says...

On 7/29/13 2:50 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 7/29/2013 12:55 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jul 2013 23:59:45 -0700, jps wrote:

Australia is always the poster child for gun control laws but the
reality is the trend line for murders did not change in any
perceptible way when they banned and confiscated most of the guns.
Certainly less people were killed by guns but they still found a way.

But no more mass murders, to date.

Mass killings are such an insignificant part of the murder rate that
they get lost in the noise, statistically. It is just what the TV
chooses to report.
They have a "Newtown" in the black community every week and it barely
makes the paper.
The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him. Then it is a national disaster.


You forgot one thing... Let me "fix" your statement..

The only time a dead black guy makes the news is if a white guy kills
him and the democratic party needs a huge distraction leading up to an
election. Then it is a national disaster.

There you go... I fixed it.


And once again, you prove you don't know anything about anything.

How's your homegrown racing doing this season

Now, quit, he's stated right here that he has a mental problem because
of getting his jawbone broke......