"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:31 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...



The pronouncements of those who are not the judge or jury don't
matter.
I think Zimmerman is guilty of a violent criminal offense that
resulted
from his actions alone, but I also know that the offense took place
in
Redneckville, Florida, that the victim was black, and most of the
jury
is white, so I don't expect Zimmerman to be found guilty.

-------------------------------------

Wow. So much for giving consideration to any evidence and law that
might indicate otherwise.
Redneckville? 24 states have Stand Your Ground statutes. That's
one
shy of half the country.

Al Sharpton has schooled you well, it seems.


It is unfortunate that so-called "Stand Your Ground" laws allow a
gun-toter to stalk an unarmed person, confront that person,
precipitate
an argument, and then shoot and kill that person.

That is precisely what Zimmerman did, eh.


-------------------------------------------

The "Stand Your Ground" laws in this country specifically forbid any
action as you have described. What actually happened in the
Zimmerman case will be determined by a jury after giving consideration
to all the evidence presented in the trial.

On 7/3/13 7:06 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:31 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...



The pronouncements of those who are not the judge or jury don't matter.
I think Zimmerman is guilty of a violent criminal offense that resulted
from his actions alone, but I also know that the offense took place in
Redneckville, Florida, that the victim was black, and most of the jury
is white, so I don't expect Zimmerman to be found guilty.

-------------------------------------

Wow. So much for giving consideration to any evidence and law that
might indicate otherwise.
Redneckville? 24 states have Stand Your Ground statutes. That's one
shy of half the country.

Al Sharpton has schooled you well, it seems.


It is unfortunate that so-called "Stand Your Ground" laws allow a
gun-toter to stalk an unarmed person, confront that person, precipitate
an argument, and then shoot and kill that person.

That is precisely what Zimmerman did, eh.


-------------------------------------------

The "Stand Your Ground" laws in this country specifically forbid any
action as you have described. What actually happened in the Zimmerman
case will be determined by a jury after giving consideration to all the
evidence presented in the trial.


I have little confidence in southern, white juries deliberating on
whether a white man killed a black man, but we shall see.

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 7:06 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:31 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...



The pronouncements of those who are not the judge or jury don't
matter.
I think Zimmerman is guilty of a violent criminal offense that
resulted
from his actions alone, but I also know that the offense took place
in
Redneckville, Florida, that the victim was black, and most of the
jury
is white, so I don't expect Zimmerman to be found guilty.

-------------------------------------

Wow. So much for giving consideration to any evidence and law
that
might indicate otherwise.
Redneckville? 24 states have Stand Your Ground statutes. That's
one
shy of half the country.

Al Sharpton has schooled you well, it seems.


It is unfortunate that so-called "Stand Your Ground" laws allow a
gun-toter to stalk an unarmed person, confront that person,
precipitate
an argument, and then shoot and kill that person.

That is precisely what Zimmerman did, eh.


-------------------------------------------

The "Stand Your Ground" laws in this country specifically forbid any
action as you have described. What actually happened in the
Zimmerman
case will be determined by a jury after giving consideration to all
the
evidence presented in the trial.


I have little confidence in southern, white juries deliberating on
whether a white man killed a black man, but we shall see.

---------------------------------------

There's no argument as to whether Zimmerman killed Martin. Zimmerman
admits that.
The question is was he justified in doing so.

But, I understand your point even though I don't agree with your all
inclusive, predetermined views on the subject.

On 7/3/13 7:22 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 7:06 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:31 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...



The pronouncements of those who are not the judge or jury don't matter.
I think Zimmerman is guilty of a violent criminal offense that resulted
from his actions alone, but I also know that the offense took place in
Redneckville, Florida, that the victim was black, and most of the jury
is white, so I don't expect Zimmerman to be found guilty.

-------------------------------------

Wow. So much for giving consideration to any evidence and law that
might indicate otherwise.
Redneckville? 24 states have Stand Your Ground statutes. That's one
shy of half the country.

Al Sharpton has schooled you well, it seems.


It is unfortunate that so-called "Stand Your Ground" laws allow a
gun-toter to stalk an unarmed person, confront that person, precipitate
an argument, and then shoot and kill that person.

That is precisely what Zimmerman did, eh.


-------------------------------------------

The "Stand Your Ground" laws in this country specifically forbid any
action as you have described. What actually happened in the Zimmerman
case will be determined by a jury after giving consideration to all the
evidence presented in the trial.


I have little confidence in southern, white juries deliberating on
whether a white man killed a black man, but we shall see.

---------------------------------------

There's no argument as to whether Zimmerman killed Martin. Zimmerman
admits that.
The question is was he justified in doing so.

But, I understand your point even though I don't agree with your all
inclusive, predetermined views on the subject.



I have no requirement that you agree with my preconceived notions!
You're a better than reasonable guy, even when you are completely wrong
(from my point of view).

On 7/3/2013 7:26 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I have no requirement that you agree with my preconceived notions!
You're a better than reasonable guy, even when you are completely wrong
(from my point of view).

That was a hard read. Was it proper English?

On 7/3/2013 7:22 AM, Eisboch wrote:
But, I understand your point even though I don't agree with your all
inclusive, predetermined views on the subject.


His views are purely racist. He gives nothing else consideration.

On 7/3/2013 7:12 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I have little confidence in southern, white juries deliberating on
whether a white man killed a black man, but we shall see.

That point isn't to be deliberated. Why so biased and racist, Harry?

On 7/3/2013 7:06 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:31 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...



The pronouncements of those who are not the judge or jury don't matter.
I think Zimmerman is guilty of a violent criminal offense that resulted
from his actions alone, but I also know that the offense took place in
Redneckville, Florida, that the victim was black, and most of the jury
is white, so I don't expect Zimmerman to be found guilty.

-------------------------------------

Wow. So much for giving consideration to any evidence and law that
might indicate otherwise.
Redneckville? 24 states have Stand Your Ground statutes. That's one
shy of half the country.

Al Sharpton has schooled you well, it seems.


It is unfortunate that so-called "Stand Your Ground" laws allow a
gun-toter to stalk an unarmed person, confront that person, precipitate
an argument, and then shoot and kill that person.

That is precisely what Zimmerman did, eh.


-------------------------------------------

The "Stand Your Ground" laws in this country specifically forbid any
action as you have described. What actually happened in the Zimmerman
case will be determined by a jury after giving consideration to all the
evidence presented in the trial.

Until Trev pushed Zimm to the ground and started wailing on him, No
crime had been committed. Why don't we proceed from that point in time.
Forget what happened prior.

In article m,
says...

On 7/3/2013 7:06 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:31 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...



The pronouncements of those who are not the judge or jury don't matter.
I think Zimmerman is guilty of a violent criminal offense that resulted
from his actions alone, but I also know that the offense took place in
Redneckville, Florida, that the victim was black, and most of the jury
is white, so I don't expect Zimmerman to be found guilty.

-------------------------------------

Wow. So much for giving consideration to any evidence and law that
might indicate otherwise.
Redneckville? 24 states have Stand Your Ground statutes. That's one
shy of half the country.

Al Sharpton has schooled you well, it seems.


It is unfortunate that so-called "Stand Your Ground" laws allow a
gun-toter to stalk an unarmed person, confront that person, precipitate
an argument, and then shoot and kill that person.

That is precisely what Zimmerman did, eh.


-------------------------------------------

The "Stand Your Ground" laws in this country specifically forbid any
action as you have described. What actually happened in the Zimmerman
case will be determined by a jury after giving consideration to all the
evidence presented in the trial.

Until Trev pushed Zimm to the ground and started wailing on him, No
crime had been committed. Why don't we proceed from that point in time.
Forget what happened prior.

With liberals it is not the action that describes the situation it is the intention prior to
the action that should be used to judge the action.