Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2013
Posts: 1,476
Default What a joke

On 7/3/2013 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet.


"But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'.
No need for a trial."


I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who
has
a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots
an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman
has
a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave
Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the
situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin.

--------------------------------------------

May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you
reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it
relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a
friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial
charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to
"resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he
agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program.

As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge.
An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a
counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of
that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either.

If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are
several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the
portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The
only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his
family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension
when this whole affair occurred.


I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also waiting for a picture
of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious message of using an older
picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest.

Most likely It will be Al who plays that card. The parents know he was
no angel and I doubt they will say he is/was.
  #62   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default What a joke

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

In article
,
says...


So now the court is in a 15 minute break. The MSNBC crew are all
excitedly discussing this "conflicting expert testimony" and about
how the doc said Zimmerman only got hit a couple of times.

You gotta be kidding me.


http://newsone.com/2001237/trayvon-martin-zimmerman-
guilty/
It's nearly all racial/ethnic. Blacks on TV universally
cast the worst light on anything about Zimmerman.
CNN black "analysts/commentators" do it too.
Same with the rabid anti-gun whites.
Some whites blindly support Zimmerman because he's white.
"Normal" people who rely on the scales of justice being
fair and impartial are disturbed that justice is being
made a circus by the racists and other nut jobs.
Not too much different than the OJ trial.
Personally, I think both shooter and victim were punks.
I'll go with the trial outcome.
But I can't see any way in the world that "depraved
mind" can be proved against Zimmerman - unless the jury
is incompetent. And that wouldn't surprise me at all.
They might find him guilty of manslaughter.
I wouldn't, given the evidence I've seen.
Seems clearly self-defense from all evidence I've heard.
But the selected jury will decide.
That's all that matters, barring appeals.



Isn't Zimmerman Hispanic with some African-American in his background? This makes him a brown
person and not a whitey.


So? Does that mean that he can't be prejudiced?
  #63   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default What a joke

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet.


"But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'.
No need for a trial."


I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who
has
a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots
an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman
has
a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave
Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the
situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin.

--------------------------------------------

May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you
reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it
relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a
friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial
charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to
"resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he
agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program.

As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge.
An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a
counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of
that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either.

If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are
several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the
portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The
only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his
family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension
when this whole affair occurred.


I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also waiting for a picture
of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious message of using an older
picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest.


Was it also dishonest for FOX to show pictures of a young suit wearing
Zimmerman?
  #66   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default What a joke

In article ,
says...

On 7/3/2013 7:36 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/3/2013 6:57 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/3/13 6:56 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet.


"But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'.
No need for a trial."


I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who has
a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots
an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman has
a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave
Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the
situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin.

--------------------------------------------

May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you
reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it relates
to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a friend and
acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial charge of
"resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to "resisting an
officer without violence" and then dismissed when he agreed to enter an
alcohol abuse program.

As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge. An
ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a counter
restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of that. A
"domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either.

If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are
several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the
portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The only
one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his family is
the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension when this
whole affair occurred.



I'm sorry...when was Martin arrested or served with a restraining order?

When was Zimm suspended from school on several occasions for drug
possession among other things. Introducing Trev's and Zimm's history
into the record might tip the scales in favor of Zimm. Maybe not.


I think it would be great if their past were both included... Martin was
a thug, he was up to no good, he got shot.... period.


How do you know he was "up to no good", idiot?
  #68   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default What a joke

On 7/3/2013 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet.


"But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'.
No need for a trial."


I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who
has
a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots
an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman
has
a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave
Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the
situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin.

--------------------------------------------

May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you
reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it
relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a
friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial
charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to
"resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he
agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program.

As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge.
An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a
counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of
that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either.

If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are
several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the
portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The
only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his
family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension
when this whole affair occurred.


I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also waiting for a picture
of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious message of using an older
picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest.


It was huge in this case. The news made this case by convincing everyone
including one witness (who later recanted based on real photos) who
initially thought Zimmerman was "on top" but later realized the false
representation with a old picture of Martin, made her think "Zimmerman"
was the one on top. She later changed her testimony, even in court
here.... but by now of course, that picture got Sharpton on top and
started all of this... It was the drooling MSM that did this...
  #69   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,106
Default What a joke

On 7/3/2013 9:43 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/3/2013 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet.


"But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'.
No need for a trial."


I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who
has
a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots
an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman
has
a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave
Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the
situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin.

--------------------------------------------

May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you
reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it
relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a
friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial
charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to
"resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he
agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program.

As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge.
An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a
counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of
that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either.

If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are
several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the
portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The
only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his
family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension
when this whole affair occurred.


I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also
waiting for a picture
of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious
message of using an older
picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest.

Most likely It will be Al who plays that card. The parents know he was
no angel and I doubt they will say he is/was.


If they play it in court, it's all over...
  #70   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,069
Default What a joke

In article ,
says...

On 7/3/2013 9:43 AM, Hank© wrote:
On 7/3/2013 9:00 AM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/3/13 6:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:46:46 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Personally, I haven't "lined up" with either side yet.


"But, Harry. you're pronounced Zimmerman guilty from the world 'go'.
No need for a trial."


I think you are quoting someone else there, Tim. I think anyone who
has
a record of violence and who is outside his or her home and who shoots
an unarmed stranger is likely guilty of a serious felony. Zimmerman
has
a record of violence, he was not in his home, he was advised to leave
Mr. Martin to the police, he stalked Martin instead, and when the
situation he created got away from him, he shot and killed Martin.

--------------------------------------------

May be the case. But to be accurate, the "record of violence" you
reference has been determined to be rather minor in nature as it
relates to his prior arrest. Basically, he was drinking along with a
friend and acted like an idiot, same as most drunks do. The initial
charge of "resisting an officer with violence" was reduced to
"resisting an officer without violence" and then dismissed when he
agreed to enter an alcohol abuse program.

As to the domestic violence accusation ... there was never a charge.
An ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order. Zimmerman filed a
counter restraining order. Both were granted. That was the end of
that. A "domestic violence" charge was never pursued by either.

If Zimmerman's past is important then so is Martin's. There are
several examples of alleged actions and behavior that diminish the
portrayal of him being a upright, law abiding model citizen. The
only one that has been officially acknowledged by records and his
family is the school suspensions. In fact, he was under a suspension
when this whole affair occurred.

I am waiting for the Martin was an angel card to be played. I am also
waiting for a picture
of Marin that isn't three or four years old being used. The obvious
message of using an older
picuture portraying Martin as a pre-teen is dishonest.

Most likely It will be Al who plays that card. The parents know he was
no angel and I doubt they will say he is/was.


If they play it in court, it's all over...


Holy **** you are stupid!!!!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A joke Loogypicker[_2_] General 1 December 2nd 09 03:54 PM
Joke of The Day... Short Wave Sportfishing General 34 March 16th 07 12:04 PM
joke of the day... Doug Kanter General 4 January 12th 06 01:33 PM
BCS a Sad Joke N.L. Eckert General 1 January 8th 06 03:08 PM
BCS a Sad Joke Skipper General 15 January 7th 06 03:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017