It's no more wrong to try to persuade the jury of that with no
evidence
than it is to try to persuade the jury that Zimmerman is a great
humanitarian that was just trying to help better his neighborhood.
------------------------------------------
Sorry to say, but you have a very prejudiced interpretation of the
actual testimony and evidence to date.
How so, I've not ever said he was guilty or not guilty.
Any implied "evidence" by either side that doesn't exist would
immediately prompt an objection from the other side and would be
tossed by the judge.
Are you actually *watching* the trial or are you just getting opinions
from the media?
Doesn't matter, whether or not there is an objection, the seed is
planted many times. And yes, I'm watching it, delayed every evening. I'm
surely not letting it control my day.
![iBoaterer[_3_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Zimm trial
Threaded Mode
