....awwwww.

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE

In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for
deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit
in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country,
and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS
have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a
de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that
deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage.

The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally
recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored
this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it
opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and
incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right?
It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical
conclusion.

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts..

Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil
sharpeners...

On 6/26/2013 6:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Namecalling right from the subject line and I bet the hypocrites here
address the content...LOL!

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 6:56:59 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...awwwww.



U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA

Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard



Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE



In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for

deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit

in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country,

and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS

have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a

de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that

deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage.



The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally

recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored

this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it

opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and

incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right?

It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical

conclusion.



(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts..



Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil

sharpeners...

All we at rec.boats could hope for is the IRS comes knocking, and you commit suicide....

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

In article , says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?

On 6/28/2013 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?


Because it isn't.

In article , says...

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:08:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA
Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard

The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS
punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the
states.
You can still have a couple married in California, considered
unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon.

Yes, but their rights follow them.


Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple
from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire
state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage.
What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the
states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers
will come down.

That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in
the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance.

Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California?

I dunno. The same reason it is not honored in:

Connecticut, District of Columbia, Guam, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, New York
City, Ohio, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, Virgin Islands,
Washington, American Samoa, Illinois, N. Mariana Islands?

If a marriage "can" be force to be recognized by other states then surely a CCW permit is
just the same.

On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:56:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...awwwww.



U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA

Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard



Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE



In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for

deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit

in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country,

and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS

have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a

de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that

deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage.



The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally

recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored

this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it

opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and

incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right?

It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical

conclusion.



(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts..



Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil

sharpeners...

Harry, I didn't know you subscribed to freerepublic.com or Freedom Outpost for that matter. I don't read freerepublic and I'd not heard of freedom outpost. I'm surprised you read them..

wow.

Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:56:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...awwwww.



U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA

Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard



Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE



In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for

deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit

in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country,

and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS

have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a

de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that

deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage.



The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally

recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored

this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it

opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and

incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right?

It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical

conclusion.



(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts..



Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil

sharpeners...

Harry, I didn't know you subscribed to freerepublic.com or Freedom
Outpost for that matter. I don't read freerepublic and I'd not heard of
freedom outpost. I'm surprised you read them..

wow.

I don't but a couple of blogs I follow keep tabs on the bat**** crazy
rightie sites such as the creepy freepers. At least two regular posters
here are freepers.