Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....awwwww.
U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country, and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage. The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right? It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical conclusion. (Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts.. Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil sharpeners... |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/26/2013 6:56 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
Namecalling right from the subject line and I bet the hypocrites here address the content...LOL! |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 6:56:59 PM UTC-4, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...awwwww. U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country, and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage. The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right? It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical conclusion. (Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts.. Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil sharpeners... All we at rec.boats could hope for is the IRS comes knocking, and you commit suicide.... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:56:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote:
...awwwww. U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country, and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage. The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right? It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical conclusion. (Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts.. Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil sharpeners... Harry, I didn't know you subscribed to freerepublic.com or Freedom Outpost for that matter. I don't read freerepublic and I'd not heard of freedom outpost. I'm surprised you read them.. wow. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:56:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: ...awwwww. U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country, and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage. The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right? It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical conclusion. (Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts.. Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil sharpeners... Harry, I didn't know you subscribed to freerepublic.com or Freedom Outpost for that matter. I don't read freerepublic and I'd not heard of freedom outpost. I'm surprised you read them.. wow. I don't but a couple of blogs I follow keep tabs on the bat**** crazy rightie sites such as the creepy freepers. At least two regular posters here are freepers. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/28/2013 9:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 5:56:59 PM UTC-5, F.O.A.D. wrote: ...awwwww. U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War – SCOTUS strikes down DOMA Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard Posted on Wed Jun 26 13:34:30 2013 by EXCH54FE In a victory for sexual perverts in States where it is legal for deviants to be married, The Supreme Court of the United States has spit in the face of Almighty God and every true Christian in this country, and ignored thousands of years of human history in which homosexual ACTS have been tolerated by some, but never have they allowed to marry on a de facto or de jure basis, by striking down the provisions of DOMA that deny sexual deviants the same Federal benefits of marriage. The error in this reasoning is that homosexuals are not a federally recognized protected class, yet the majority court seems to have ignored this axiom. The really disturbing part of this ruling on Doma is that it opens the door for States to permit incestuous, polygamous, and incestuous polygamous marriages; equal rights for all means ALL, right? It appears that the Court did not think this through to its logical conclusion. (Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ... http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3035913/posts.. Yep. Pretty soon dogs will marry cats, wooden matches will marry pencil sharpeners... Harry, I didn't know you subscribed to freerepublic.com or Freedom Outpost for that matter. I don't read freerepublic and I'd not heard of freedom outpost. I'm surprised you read them.. wow. Harry searches far and wide to find garbage suitable for him to read. As the saying goes, "garbage in garbage out". |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the states. You can still have a couple married in California, considered unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon. Yes, but their rights follow them. Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage. What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers will come down. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/28/2013 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:18:47 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 6/27/13 8:13 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:56:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: U.S. moves one step closer to Civil War ? SCOTUS strikes down DOMA Freedom Outpost ^ | June 26, 2013 | Shea Bernard The DOMA decision is not the one that will start the civil war. SCOTUS punting on Perry threw the question of state marriage laws back to the states. You can still have a couple married in California, considered unmarried across the line in Arizona, Nevada and Oregon. Yes, but their rights follow them. Well, the jury is out on that one, but it appears that if a gay couple from California moves to Backwardsville, Texas (that would be the entire state), the state of Texas does not have to recognize that marriage. What is going to happen is that there will be many lawsuits filed in the states that don't recognize gay marriage, and eventually those barriers will come down. That may be true in the 9th circuit but it may not go the same way in the 11th and the court did not give them any specific guidance. Why wouldn't my Texas issued CCW permit be honored in California? Because it isn't. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Awwwww,,,they're upset. | General | |||
Huh? (Thomas will really be upset now) | Cruising | |||
Hold on. - upset.jpg (1/1) | Tall Ship Photos | |||
Today I've Been Upset! | ASA | |||
Hey Bobby! Upset??? | ASA |