http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell

On Fri, 24 May 2013 00:53:10 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.


I thought Kevin and Harry said Zimmerman was guilty of murder. Why discuss it further?

John H.
--

Hope you're having a great day!

In article ,
says...

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell

Wait!!! YOU said you don't listen to FOX!!!

In article ,
says...

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell

A person can't have a picture of a gun now without being guilty of
something?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:27:37 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell

A person can't have a picture of a gun now without being guilty of
something?

A 17 year old can't be talking about buying a handgun without being in
a conspiracy to do something illegal.

Really??? Horse****! But, again, what does this have to do with
Zimmerman's innocence or guilt?

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman
was being attacked.

Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this???

On 5/24/2013 10:06 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:27:37 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell

A person can't have a picture of a gun now without being guilty of
something?

A 17 year old can't be talking about buying a handgun without being in
a conspiracy to do something illegal.

Why not? Kids are fascinated with guns.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:57 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman
was being attacked.

Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this???

A handgun he was offering for sa;le.
You are ignoring him bragging about beating down a guy and wanting to
beat him again because "he didn't bleed 'nuff."
He HAD a gun he was trying to sell illegally, just not with him at the
moment (he may have actually sold it by then)

Means nothing in the case of Zimmerman.

Trayvonn was a drug dealing, gun dealing thug based on his phone dump.
I am not sure why you are defending him.
I guess it is because he wasn't in your neighborhood.

I tend to defend those who haven't been proven guilty in a court of law.
Why do you continue to defend Zimmerman, a KNOWN liar, who has been
KNOWN to be violent and arrested for it? He's lied several times about
this VERY CASE and you still think he's telling the truth??

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:06 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:27:37 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell

A person can't have a picture of a gun now without being guilty of
something?

A 17 year old can't be talking about buying a handgun without being in
a conspiracy to do something illegal.

Really??? Horse****! But, again, what does this have to do with
Zimmerman's innocence or guilt?

It goes toward proving Travonn was not the innocent 14 year old we see
in that Hollister T shirt and that he was likely to have been the
aggressor.
Travonn brags about being "Gangsta"

But I suppose that Zimmerman lying about things in this very case, plus
his KNOWN (and arrested for) aggression and violence doesn't go toward
proving Zimmerman isn't the innocent victim he tries to make out to be,
right?