In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:57 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman
was being attacked.

Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this???

A handgun he was offering for sa;le.
You are ignoring him bragging about beating down a guy and wanting to
beat him again because "he didn't bleed 'nuff."
He HAD a gun he was trying to sell illegally, just not with him at the
moment (he may have actually sold it by then)

Means nothing in the case of Zimmerman.

Trayvonn was a drug dealing, gun dealing thug based on his phone dump.
I am not sure why you are defending him.
I guess it is because he wasn't in your neighborhood.

I tend to defend those who haven't been proven guilty in a court of law.
Why do you continue to defend Zimmerman, a KNOWN liar, who has been
KNOWN to be violent and arrested for it? He's lied several times about
this VERY CASE and you still think he's telling the truth??