|
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
|
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough" I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called Martin a thug and see why he said that. If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in. Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering him or not. |
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:27:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell A person can't have a picture of a gun now without being guilty of something? A 17 year old can't be talking about buying a handgun without being in a conspiracy to do something illegal. Really??? Horse****! But, again, what does this have to do with Zimmerman's innocence or guilt? |
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough" I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called Martin a thug and see why he said that. If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in. Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering him or not. It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman was being attacked. Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this??? |
More info.. not looking good...
On 5/24/2013 10:06 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:27:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell A person can't have a picture of a gun now without being guilty of something? A 17 year old can't be talking about buying a handgun without being in a conspiracy to do something illegal. Why not? Kids are fascinated with guns. |
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough" I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called Martin a thug and see why he said that. If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in. Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering him or not. It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman was being attacked. Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this??? A handgun he was offering for sa;le. You are ignoring him bragging about beating down a guy and wanting to beat him again because "he didn't bleed 'nuff." He HAD a gun he was trying to sell illegally, just not with him at the moment (he may have actually sold it by then) Means nothing in the case of Zimmerman. Trayvonn was a drug dealing, gun dealing thug based on his phone dump. I am not sure why you are defending him. I guess it is because he wasn't in your neighborhood. I tend to defend those who haven't been proven guilty in a court of law. Why do you continue to defend Zimmerman, a KNOWN liar, who has been KNOWN to be violent and arrested for it? He's lied several times about this VERY CASE and you still think he's telling the truth?? |
More info.. not looking good...
In article ,
says... On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:06 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:27:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell A person can't have a picture of a gun now without being guilty of something? A 17 year old can't be talking about buying a handgun without being in a conspiracy to do something illegal. Really??? Horse****! But, again, what does this have to do with Zimmerman's innocence or guilt? It goes toward proving Travonn was not the innocent 14 year old we see in that Hollister T shirt and that he was likely to have been the aggressor. Travonn brags about being "Gangsta" But I suppose that Zimmerman lying about things in this very case, plus his KNOWN (and arrested for) aggression and violence doesn't go toward proving Zimmerman isn't the innocent victim he tries to make out to be, right? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com