In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman
was being attacked.

Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this???

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:57 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman
was being attacked.

Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this???

A handgun he was offering for sa;le.
You are ignoring him bragging about beating down a guy and wanting to
beat him again because "he didn't bleed 'nuff."
He HAD a gun he was trying to sell illegally, just not with him at the
moment (he may have actually sold it by then)

Means nothing in the case of Zimmerman.

Trayvonn was a drug dealing, gun dealing thug based on his phone dump.
I am not sure why you are defending him.
I guess it is because he wasn't in your neighborhood.

I tend to defend those who haven't been proven guilty in a court of law.
Why do you continue to defend Zimmerman, a KNOWN liar, who has been
KNOWN to be violent and arrested for it? He's lied several times about
this VERY CASE and you still think he's telling the truth??

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:30:07 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 11:19:57 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:28:48 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 23 May 2013 23:11:11 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/05/23...n-martins-cell


They also have evidence from his texts that he is a thug who likes
beating people up. He talks about a guy he beat up but he wanted
another shot at him because he "didn't bleed enough"

I imagine they might even subpoena the North Miami cop who called
Martin a thug and see why he said that.

If "character" ever comes up or if there is ever any question about
whether Martin might have attacked Zimmerman, this all comes in.

Makes NO difference in the case of Zimmerman being guilty of murdering
him or not.

It is not murder if the jury thinks there is a chance that Zimmerman
was being attacked.

Again, this picture of a handgun does WHAT to prove this???

A handgun he was offering for sa;le.
You are ignoring him bragging about beating down a guy and wanting to
beat him again because "he didn't bleed 'nuff."
He HAD a gun he was trying to sell illegally, just not with him at the
moment (he may have actually sold it by then)

Means nothing in the case of Zimmerman.

Trayvonn was a drug dealing, gun dealing thug based on his phone dump.
I am not sure why you are defending him.
I guess it is because he wasn't in your neighborhood.

I tend to defend those who haven't been proven guilty in a court of law.

Has Zimmerman been proven guilty in a court of law ... no. He has been
convicted in your mind tho.

No he hasn't and you can't show me one thing I've said that would make
you think so.

Why do you continue to defend Zimmerman, a KNOWN liar, who has been
KNOWN to be violent and arrested for it? He's lied several times about
this VERY CASE and you still think he's telling the truth??


Zimmerman was involved with over 50 different incidents where he
called the police and there was never any violence, threats or
confrontations. The two incidents you refer to were a long time ago.

Zimmerman was also in incidents where there WAS violence and he was
arrested for it. Why do you continue to not answer about that?

The Travonn things are very recent and show an increasing degree of
violent activities.
Zimmernan turned his life around, Martin was sinking into the
"gangsta" world as fast as he could.
Bear in mind, he would not have even been in Sanford if he was not
kicked out of school for being a thug.

Bear in mind that Zimmerman has told lies about this case. Funny, you
don't answer to the negative things about Zimmerman, you simply delete
them and carry on your vigilante approach about a kid who is dead and
can't defend himself.

On 5/25/2013 2:16 AM, wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 16:17:12 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Zimmerman was also in incidents where there WAS violence and he was
arrested for it. Why do you continue to not answer about that?

Zimmerman was arrested for arguing with a cop. If there was really any
violence, he would have had the **** beat out of him. That was a
hummer.

The Travonn things are very recent and show an increasing degree of
violent activities.
Zimmernan turned his life around, Martin was sinking into the
"gangsta" world as fast as he could.
Bear in mind, he would not have even been in Sanford if he was not
kicked out of school for being a thug.

Bear in mind that Zimmerman has told lies about this case. Funny, you
don't answer to the negative things about Zimmerman, you simply delete
them and carry on your vigilante approach about a kid who is dead and
can't defend himself.

Zimmermans WIFE lied about how much money they had at a bail hearing.
Where is there any evidence that MR Zimmerman lied about the specifics
about the case?


You guys still running this over? LoL, Martin was a thug, he got shot
for it... finished business...

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 24 May 2013 16:17:12 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

Zimmerman was also in incidents where there WAS violence and he was
arrested for it. Why do you continue to not answer about that?

Zimmerman was arrested for arguing with a cop. If there was really any
violence, he would have had the **** beat out of him. That was a
hummer.

Really?:

George Zimmerman has been accused of domestic violence, tussling with a
police officer and for over-speeding.
In 2005, Zimmerman was arrested and charged with "resisting officer with
violence" and "battery of law enforcement officer." Both these felonies
are considered third-degree. Due to his desperate attempts, the charges
were reduced to "resisting officer without violence" and then the only
remaining charge was also completely waived off when he entered an
alcohol education program.
In the same year (2005), Zimmerman's ex-fiance, Veronica Zuazo, filed a
civil motion for a restraining order, alleging domestic violence. In
retaliation, Zimmerman filed for a retraining order against Zuazo and
both these claims were resolved with both restraining orders granted.
The next year, in 2006, Zimmerman was charged with speeding. However,
that case was dismissed because the officer who charged him failed to
show up at the court.

The Travonn things are very recent and show an increasing degree of
violent activities.
Zimmernan turned his life around, Martin was sinking into the
"gangsta" world as fast as he could.
Bear in mind, he would not have even been in Sanford if he was not
kicked out of school for being a thug.

Bear in mind that Zimmerman has told lies about this case. Funny, you
don't answer to the negative things about Zimmerman, you simply delete
them and carry on your vigilante approach about a kid who is dead and
can't defend himself.

Zimmermans WIFE lied about how much money they had at a bail hearing.
Where is there any evidence that MR Zimmerman lied about the specifics
about the case?


1. HE told police he had a clean record when taken in. That is a
complete lie, see above.
2.When Zimmerman offered an apology to Trayvon's family during an April
20 bond hearing, Zimmerman said he didn't realize Trayvon was so young.
But in his call to police moments before the shooting he described
Trayvon, who was 17, as in his "late teens."

And of course, I guess you are trying to say that Shellie Zimmerman lied
about the finances without George knowing about it? Well, that's pure
bull**** too, HE told her to pay off their AMEX card among other things.
I'll ask again, why do you continue to take stock in a KNOWN violent
person and KNOWN liar? I guess it's easy to pin stuff on a dead kid, eh?