On Fri, 10 May 2013 18:13:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/10/13 6:10 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 17:28:26 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Dumb and dumber, aka Herring and PsychoSnotty.

====

Cyber stalking can be a criminal offence in some circumstances.



You'll have to explain how my comment, immediately above, is "cyber
stalkng,"

=============

Think about it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking

On 5/10/13 7:13 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 18:13:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/10/13 6:10 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 17:28:26 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Dumb and dumber, aka Herring and PsychoSnotty.

====

Cyber stalking can be a criminal offence in some circumstances.



You'll have to explain how my comment, immediately above, is "cyber
stalkng,"

=============

Think about it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking


You should think about it.

In article , says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:04:59 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 11:51:34 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/9/13 11:39 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 09 May 2013 07:44:55 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

You're willing to risk getting yourself shot to protect inanimate
objects? I'm not. We had a burglar visit us when we lived in Florida. I
caught him in the act. He came after me with a pry bar. I whacked him
with my truck, but not because he stole our stuff, but because he was
threatening me physically.

That is what got Martin shot

Oh, in what criminal act was Martin engaging?

Assault and battery


Prove it.

That is not how it works. The state has to prove Zimmerman was not
attacked.

We will give the guilty ******* a fair trial and then hang him!

In article ,
says...

On 5/10/2013 2:34 PM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:17:43 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/7/13 10:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

In article om,
says...

On 5/2/2013 12:38 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/2/13 12:30 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013 09:06:37 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,


No, like a lot of people he thought he was a bad-ass because he had a
gun.

You are certainly making a lot of **** up here.

Such as? He was a vigilante!

He was watching a suspicious person

Yeah, right, a "suspicious person" walking to his uncle's house in the
subdivision, and carrying a dangerous soft drink and a bag of candy.


His uncle doesn't have property in that sub division.

Wasn't it his fathers girlfriend who actually onwed the property. Trayvon's daddy was
shacking up with some chick.

I suppose THAT makes Martin guilty?

Just another piece of information.

Relevant how?


Everyone knows only black guys shack up with chicks. White guys shack up
with their guns and other guys.

I thought gay was good! Here you go making disparaging comments about same again.

John H.


It's only an election tool for them...

I guess if someone is as stupid as you and John, then they may say that
someone said something "disparaging" about gays. Could you point that
out, please?

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 May 2013 18:13:37 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 5/10/13 6:10 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 17:28:26 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

Dumb and dumber, aka Herring and PsychoSnotty.

====

Cyber stalking can be a criminal offence in some circumstances.



You'll have to explain how my comment, immediately above, is "cyber
stalkng,"

=============

Think about it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberstalking

No more than Herring going to every post that he doesn't agree with and
replying "another troll."

In article m, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 5/10/2013 1:44 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 5/10/13 1:21 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, hank57
@socialworker.net says...

On 5/10/2013 7:10 AM, BAR wrote:
In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 8 May 2013 15:02:23 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 08 May 2013 12:45:56 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

I believe Zimmerman initiated the fight and when it got out of
hand, he
ran to his truck and got his pistol.

It is clear that you have not actually been paying much
attention to
it then. That is inconsistent with every version of the story
that is
out there. (The girl friend, the police and Zimmerman himself)

The police didn't see it, how could THEY make judgment? The
girlfriend
said that the kid simply asked why Zimmerman was following him.
Zimmerman gave a lot of hearsay, but then he's a known liar.

If you keep going with the girl friends's story, Zimmerman asked
"What
are you doing here" and the fight started.
Presumably Martin's answer to that question was a punch in the face.

The autopsy showed Martin had banged up fists and no other injuries
but a bullet hole in his chest. We have seen the pictures of
Zimmerman's face and the back of his head. I suppose you and Sharpton
can explain that another way but it sure sounds like a beating to
me.

So, I guess that if a stranger comes running up to you in the
middle of
the night, you'd just let him do whatever he wants to you? Hell
yes, he
was fighting for his life, a thug had accosted him with a gun.

Where does it say that Zimmerman was running up to Martin?


Nowhere. However ILoogy is a known liar and will stretch the truth or
outright lie to "prove" his pointless points.

Idiot.


You can be sure that if Martin had been a white teen-ager, conservatrash
like "FlaJim" would be on his side in this tragedy.

I doubt that. Martin was a career criminal in the making. Don't matter
what his skin shade was.

What makes you think he was a "career criminal in the making"?

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:42:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!

So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman

No she didn't. That's a lie.


OK what do you think she said

When Martin was cornered by a gun wielding assailant he asked him "Why
are you following me"? I'd have asked the same thing. She never, ever
said that Martin confronted Zimmerman. It's the other way around.

Gun wielding assailant? There is no evidence that Zimmerman had his firearm in his hand when
he met up with Martin.

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:26:14 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 9 May 2013 12:20:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:42:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!

So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman

No she didn't. That's a lie.


OK what do you think she said

When Martin was cornered by a gun wielding assailant he asked him "Why
are you following me"? I'd have asked the same thing. She never, ever
said that Martin confronted Zimmerman. It's the other way around.

Martin did not know Zimmerman was armed. Prove otherwise.


No response here either?

Gosh.

John H.

Another troll.

You sure do encounter a lot of trolls when you hit the end of your illogic.

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:42:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!

So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman

No she didn't. That's a lie.


OK what do you think she said

When Martin was cornered by a gun wielding assailant he asked him "Why
are you following me"? I'd have asked the same thing. She never, ever
said that Martin confronted Zimmerman. It's the other way around.

Gun wielding assailant? There is no evidence that Zimmerman had his firearm in his hand when
he met up with Martin.

Why would it have to be "in his hand"? And there is no evidence that it
wasn't in his hand, either.

In article ,
says...

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 09 May 2013 12:26:14 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 9 May 2013 12:20:57 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 9 May 2013 08:42:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,

If a man comes chases me because I'm walking at night and accosts me, he
certainly would be in for a fight!

So is the girlfriend lying?

She says Martin confronted Zimmerman

No she didn't. That's a lie.


OK what do you think she said

When Martin was cornered by a gun wielding assailant he asked him "Why
are you following me"? I'd have asked the same thing. She never, ever
said that Martin confronted Zimmerman. It's the other way around.

Martin did not know Zimmerman was armed. Prove otherwise.


No response here either?

Gosh.

John H.

Another troll.

You sure do encounter a lot of trolls when you hit the end of your illogic.

I'm just following Herring's lead!