|
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
On 4/22/13 10:35 AM, Gogarty wrote:
In article , says... NY state senator 'torture' tweet spurs controversy PAWLING, N.Y. (AP) — A New York state senator has spurred controversy online by asking in a tweet if the Boston Marathon bombing suspect arrested Friday should be tortured. (Snip) Have none of these people ever read "The Witches of Loudon" or, for that matter "The Crucible?" These new age Republican legislators only read Marvel superhero comic books. |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
On 4/22/13 10:43 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:26:02 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? I am not sure if I hit the guy or not. He did stop shooting. I didn't see anything in the paper. That is what made me want to upgrade my equipment (a .22 SNS at the time) and work on some better training. The first time I was shot at was in the early 1960s. I had a small grant to report on a group of college students who went south during spring break to help rebuild a church that had been set on fire by the klan and also to help register voters. One night after a day of taking photos and doing interviews, we were heading back to where we were staying when the car we were in came under attack. It was a white Oldsmobile driven by a local official of the black Deacons for Defense and Justice. The car doors were peppered with bullet holes, but no one was hurt. Our driver returned fire and thought he had hit someone. The afternoon paper the next day had an article about a local who had been hit by a "stray bullet" while night hunting. Right where we were attacked. I was the real hero in that shooting. I got behind the other side of the car and stayed low. :) A group of us were roughed up a bit the next day in town. We weren't non-violent. I had the school's Nikon F with me, and it was on a wide web strap. I swung it and smashed it against the side of the head of one of the good old boys who was swinging at us with his fists. Put a small dent in the camera. Ahh, the good old days. |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
On 4/22/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 4/22/13 10:43 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:26:02 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? I am not sure if I hit the guy or not. He did stop shooting. I didn't see anything in the paper. That is what made me want to upgrade my equipment (a .22 SNS at the time) and work on some better training. The first time I was shot at was in the early ... This is as far as I got, then realized it was a harry story.. So, although I didn't read it I will go ahead and say, "cool story bro" LOL! |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
On 4/22/13 11:09 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/22/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/22/13 10:43 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:26:02 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? I am not sure if I hit the guy or not. He did stop shooting. I didn't see anything in the paper. That is what made me want to upgrade my equipment (a .22 SNS at the time) and work on some better training. The first time I was shot at was in the early ... This is as far as I got, then realized it was a harry story.. So, although I didn't read it I will go ahead and say, "cool story bro" LOL! What passes for thought in your peabrain exists only to entertain. How's the racing team doing? Going to win this year or settle for a new hair color? I hear green is the in color now |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
In article ,
says... On 4/22/2013 10:28 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:00:10 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 9:43 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:18:18 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 12:46 AM, wrote: You should train at fairly short ranges trying to develop the muscle memory to be able to hit the center of mass on a B-21 target without really aiming. It is a point and shoot exercise more like claybird than traditional bullseye. You are really only using the front sight and starting from the retention position. I also do this from the decocked condition. Your follow up shots are more traditional aimed fire but these days, you probably have legal problems with a second shot if your first one hit at all.. I agree with Hank to some degree. If you shoot someone 25 yards away, you are going to have a hard time claiming self defense.. Yup, and every bit of that training goes out the window as soon as the perp shoots back and you turn away from him... But I guess it's cool to pretend:) I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? ((Snerk)) Yeah harry, if this is above your pay grade... Babbling insanity, typical in the Scotty circle of insanity. |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
In article ,
says... On 4/22/2013 10:38 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/22/13 10:36 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:28 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:00:10 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 9:43 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:18:18 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 12:46 AM, wrote: You should train at fairly short ranges trying to develop the muscle memory to be able to hit the center of mass on a B-21 target without really aiming. It is a point and shoot exercise more like claybird than traditional bullseye. You are really only using the front sight and starting from the retention position. I also do this from the decocked condition. Your follow up shots are more traditional aimed fire but these days, you probably have legal problems with a second shot if your first one hit at all.. I agree with Hank to some degree. If you shoot someone 25 yards away, you are going to have a hard time claiming self defense.. Yup, and every bit of that training goes out the window as soon as the perp shoots back and you turn away from him... But I guess it's cool to pretend:) I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? ((Snerk)) Yeah harry, if this is above your pay grade... What does Greg's training, stance and cover matter to you? And, the reality is... None of your business stalker... Scotty calling other people stalkers!!!!! Gee, who was it that claimed to know where Harry lived and was going to send some greasy bikers to see him? Who was it that showed pictures of Don's house? |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
In article ,
says... On 4/22/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/22/13 10:43 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:26:02 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? I am not sure if I hit the guy or not. He did stop shooting. I didn't see anything in the paper. That is what made me want to upgrade my equipment (a .22 SNS at the time) and work on some better training. The first time I was shot at was in the early ... This is as far as I got, then realized it was a harry story.. So, although I didn't read it I will go ahead and say, "cool story bro" LOL! Yeah, kind of like the bull**** you sling here as "evidence"? |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
On 4/22/13 11:18 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 4/22/2013 10:28 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:00:10 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 9:43 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 07:18:18 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 12:46 AM, wrote: You should train at fairly short ranges trying to develop the muscle memory to be able to hit the center of mass on a B-21 target without really aiming. It is a point and shoot exercise more like claybird than traditional bullseye. You are really only using the front sight and starting from the retention position. I also do this from the decocked condition. Your follow up shots are more traditional aimed fire but these days, you probably have legal problems with a second shot if your first one hit at all.. I agree with Hank to some degree. If you shoot someone 25 yards away, you are going to have a hard time claiming self defense.. Yup, and every bit of that training goes out the window as soon as the perp shoots back and you turn away from him... But I guess it's cool to pretend:) I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? ((Snerk)) Yeah harry, if this is above your pay grade... Babbling insanity, typical in the Scotty circle of insanity. Imagine Scotty being interviewed for a payroll job. Now that would be a video worth watching for chuckles. |
The Bush-Cheney Legacy
In article ,
says... On 4/22/13 11:09 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:53 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 4/22/13 10:43 AM, wrote: On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:26:02 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/22/2013 10:13 AM, wrote: I have been shot at. Ok, were you shooting back at the time or taking cover or both? Shooting back. The over riding emotion was anger, not fear Ok... how did your training work out for you. Without getting into trouble, did you hit your target? Also wondering if you could elaborate on your stance and cover at the time? I am not sure if I hit the guy or not. He did stop shooting. I didn't see anything in the paper. That is what made me want to upgrade my equipment (a .22 SNS at the time) and work on some better training. The first time I was shot at was in the early ... This is as far as I got, then realized it was a harry story.. So, although I didn't read it I will go ahead and say, "cool story bro" LOL! What passes for thought in your peabrain exists only to entertain. How's the racing team doing? Going to win this year or settle for a new hair color? I hear green is the in color now It amazes me that an allegedly thinking person is positive that his family is going to make it in motocross!! Like musicians, there are thousands and thousands of very good ones, better than lots that have made it that never get the chance. It has a lot about luck. But then again, if you don't have the skills or determination to get a decent job to take care of your family, all you have is those pipe dreams. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com