![]() |
Gun control deal done
|
Gun control deal done
In article ,
says... On 4/11/2013 4:57 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:09:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/11/13 4:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 4/11/2013 2:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: J Herring wrote: On 11 Apr 2013 17:07:35 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote: J Herring wrote: On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:53:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 4/11/13 11:39 AM, Eisboch wrote: "F.O.A.D." wrote in message m... On 4/11/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:19:36 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: The Constitution does not exclude them. But then again, a convicted felon forfeited some of his rights. Those with serious mental health issues could easily be considered a danger to themselves and/or society. Alcoholics and drug addicts? How would that he controlled. I doubt if AA or NA are going to provide lists of members. And besides, members don't 'sign up' or register to be a member. I don't know what the regs are in a loose state like Virginia, but in Maryland if you are buying a firearm, you have to fill out a questionnaire for the state police on which you state under criminal penalties whether you are of legal age, whether you are engaging in a straw purchase, whether you've been convicted of a crime of violence, whether you've been convicted of a misdemeanor act of domestic violence, whether you are the respondent in a protective order, whether you've been committed to a mental institution, whether you are a habitual drunkard, et cetera. Say yes to any of 'em and your app is denied and you might get arrested. Anyone here a heavy drinker? --------------------------------------------------------- Same here in MA. As I mentioned to John in another post habitual use of drugs and/or alcohol can be cause for denial of a permit, but also every time you buy a firearm from a dealer, a form similar to the one you described .... probably the same one .... must be filled out. It specifically asks about drug and alcohol abuse. I have a difficult time understanding why so many on the right so violently oppose just about anything that relates to throttling down gun violence. I don't accept the fact that "Americans are just plain violent and gun laws will never do anything to stop it." Actually, the reasons are the same as the ones used by those on the left who oppose just about ....etc. If you call something a fact, what is there to not accept about it? It is a fact that there are some crazy-assed folks out there who will kill people - with guns or not with guns. A majority of those on the right, including a majority of NRA members, agree with the background checks. Many of the other laws, such as the majority of the rules passed by Maryland, are simply stupid. They'd have done nothing to prevent the last child massacre. However, a janitor with a concealed carry permit could have prevented it. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. Mythical. The secret service and armed police could not prevent the near-assassination of Reagan. What would you expect from a janitor whose other job was to safeguard a large school full of kids. No one mentioned anything about the janitor having 'another job', only a permit to carry a concealed weapon. And, not necessarily a janitor. An armed guidance counselor could have done as well. Shoot the gunner before he shot up twenty kids. Using your analogy, why have *any* security at the schools or any type of gun control if in one instance it can be overcome? Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. You make a lot of assumptions but ignore the issues. The average number of people killed in mass shootings when stopped by police is 14.29 The average number of people killed in a mass shooting when stopped by a civilian is 2.33 From the article he http://dailyanarchist.com/2012/07/31...ge-statistics/ Have a happy day harry, please keep playing with your guns... Daily Anarchist? Oh, well...in that case. What, in the article, do you disagree with? Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand. Nothing... It wasn't for him... Please show where Daily Anarchist got these figures. Funny, they give no citations..... |
Gun control deal done
|
Gun control deal done
On Friday, 12 April 2013 11:54:00 UTC-3, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 4/11/2013 8:32 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: So the biggest event of your military career was a failure. Must suck, eh? If you have followed Harry's modus operandi over the years, then you will have noticed that he seeks out those who seem to have a soft spot somewhere in their psychological make up or back ground. He will then chip away at that spot trying to force some sort of emotional blow up. This is a form of bullying of course which Harry seems to find amusing for some reason. It would be all too easy to compile a list of some of his past victims that he has driven from this group. Mr Hypocrite himself, drooling over with false concern for the down trodden of the world, getting his jollies by trying to push people over the edge. It's pretty sick behavior and typical for a sociopath. When no one seems to be rising to the bait, Harry will invent a new sock puppet or invite a few "friends" over from some other group. The antidote for all this is to just cut him off and ignore the sock puppets when they becme known. And Scotty's circle of insanity starts again, three or four day cycle. Is it just me..are those cycles getting shorter and shorter? Tightening up as it were. Pretty soon he'll be performing all his antics at the same time. |
Gun control deal done
|
Gun control deal done
|
Gun control deal done
|
Gun control deal done
|
Gun control deal done
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com