"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...


The "gun boys" don't like those who don't entirely accept their
catechism.

----------------------------------------------

The same can be said about many liberals.

On 4/5/2013 8:34 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

The "gun boys" don't like those who don't entirely accept their
catechism. They really, really disliked background checks.



Aren't you a gun boy?

On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:25:09 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
om...


The "gun boys" don't like those who don't entirely accept their
catechism.

----------------------------------------------

The same can be said about many liberals.


Depends on the definition of many. Compared to right wingtards
percentage wise, I'd say not many.

On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 08:05:44 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , says...

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:38:49 -0400, Hank© wrote:

On 4/4/2013 11:32 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

Oh, I definitely was a persona non grata at a Maryland gun discussion
board, and I am proud of it. I was tossed because I was NOT opposed to
background checks on gun purchasers and mandatory safety training for
first time gun purchasers, and I said so. I made the mistake of thinking
the "boys" there were rational.

I do read and post on two other gun discussion boards. Apparently there
are fewer crazies there.

Apparently, you have a lot of experience getting tossed from discussion
groups. The Android forum is just one other example.

I 'really' believe he was tossed because of his lack of opposition to background checks and being
pro safety training. What a crock.


Salmonbait

Ah, the right wing narrow minded....... Oppose background checks to
possess a weapon made to kill people, science is like voodoo, and women
are too stupid to make decisions about their bodies.

Why is the right to vote not background checked?

Shouldn't we be able to exeercise our rights, all of them, without having to constantly ask
and receive permission from the government?

Do you want to rethink your two questions? I really think you're an
unthinking ditto head. The only redeeming feature about what you wrote
is that the two sentences are in two paragraphs.

True North wrote:
I hope there's something to limit ex-military from stockpiling firearms.
Seems like every time there's a mass shooting by someone over 35, turns out he's a vet.
Really?