Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On Mar 30, 4:59*pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. *But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59*pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. *But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.

Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On 3/31/2013 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.

Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

If the bozo did some checking, he'd find that most of the CCW pistols
are sans safety levers and rely on internal safetys and long pull stiff
double action triggers to prevent accidental firing.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On 3/31/13 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.

Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



You really have trouble with language. SIG makes fine weapons. But the
particular pistol you bought does *not* have a real safety. A real
safety prevents the trigger from being pulled to the point where the
weapon will fire.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On 3/31/2013 8:01 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/31/13 7:44 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

On Mar 30, 4:59 pm, J Herring wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:44:14 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:
On Mar 30, 9:09 am, J Herring wrote:
...yesterday at Gander Mountain. Haven't fired it yet, but it
sure is a nice feeling pistol. My wife
loves the size.

While there I noticed one of these in the
cabinet:http://tinyurl.com/cpkd7td

Now I'm drooling. I don't have a .45, but think I need one for
protection in case a grisly bear
decides to break into the house.

Salmonbait

--
Hope you're having a spectacular day!

Congrat's on the 250. But for bear you might consider a .44 mag.

You're most likely correct. But, I can buy a kit that changes this
thing from a 9mm to a .45. That
might be interesting!

Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.

Look at the price of the kit and weigh out the option of another gun.

Yeah. I wouldn't want to make this Sig a .45. I'd rather it be full
size.

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the
trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.

Now go out and have a great Easter Sunday!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' last resort.



You really have trouble with language. SIG makes fine weapons. But the
particular pistol you bought does *not* have a real safety. A real
safety prevents the trigger from being pulled to the point where the
weapon will fire.

You miss the whole point of having a trigger. Pull it and the gun goes
bang. Don't pull it and it won't go bang.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

"Hank©" wrote in message
b.com...


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as
the trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.


If the bozo did some checking, he'd find that most of the CCW pistols
are sans safety levers and rely on internal safetys and long pull
stiff
double action triggers to prevent accidental firing.

----------------------------------------------------

Except those that are legal to buy in MA. Haven't checked them all,
but I think a safety is a requirement to be MA compliant which is why
so many semi-automatic pistols are not available up here. The safety
button on the Walther is really a de-cocker, but you can't pull the
trigger with it in the "safe" position. The Bodyguard also has a
safety in addition to a long trigger pull, double action only and no
exposed hammer. But revolvers, that are much more available here,
don't have a safety. Makes no sense.

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On 3/31/13 10:19 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Hank©" wrote in message
b.com...


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the
trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.


If the bozo did some checking, he'd find that most of the CCW pistols
are sans safety levers and rely on internal safetys and long pull stiff
double action triggers to prevent accidental firing.

----------------------------------------------------

Except those that are legal to buy in MA. Haven't checked them all,
but I think a safety is a requirement to be MA compliant which is why so
many semi-automatic pistols are not available up here. The safety
button on the Walther is really a de-cocker, but you can't pull the
trigger with it in the "safe" position. The Bodyguard also has a
safety in addition to a long trigger pull, double action only and no
exposed hammer. But revolvers, that are much more available here,
don't have a safety. Makes no sense.



Lots of semi auto "carry" sized pistols have safeties. I recall handling
a Walther PPK that had a traditional safety. All my semi-auto firearms
have traditional safeties. My SIG X-5 had a safety. A decocker is not a
safety.

Here are the specs on the PPK.

Aren't most revolvers sold today single action? That means you have to
pull the hammer back before you can fire. If the hammer is not pulled
back, the trigger won't fire the weapon. Thus, the safety is inherent in
the design, as it were. That said, I've seen safeties on some S&W
revolvers, and there is a company that makes a retrofit safety for them:

http://www.tarnhelm.com/murabito.html

Picked up the Sig Sauer P250
 

On 3/31/13 10:33 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 3/31/13 10:19 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"Hank©" wrote in message
b.com...


On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 20:01:21 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 3/30/13 7:43 PM, J Herring wrote:

On both the Sig and the M&P the trigger is damn near as wide as the
trigger guard. I wouldn't want
anything any wider, 'cause the safety is the trigger!


There is *no* safety on that pistol.

Yup, ESAD, compared to your stuff this is a piece of ****.


If the bozo did some checking, he'd find that most of the CCW pistols
are sans safety levers and rely on internal safetys and long pull stiff
double action triggers to prevent accidental firing.

----------------------------------------------------

Except those that are legal to buy in MA. Haven't checked them all,
but I think a safety is a requirement to be MA compliant which is why so
many semi-automatic pistols are not available up here. The safety
button on the Walther is really a de-cocker, but you can't pull the
trigger with it in the "safe" position. The Bodyguard also has a
safety in addition to a long trigger pull, double action only and no
exposed hammer. But revolvers, that are much more available here,
don't have a safety. Makes no sense.



Lots of semi auto "carry" sized pistols have safeties. I recall handling
a Walther PPK that had a traditional safety. All my semi-auto firearms
have traditional safeties. My SIG X-5 had a safety. A decocker is not a
safety.

Here are the specs on the PPK.

Aren't most revolvers sold today single action? That means you have to
pull the hammer back before you can fire. If the hammer is not pulled
back, the trigger won't fire the weapon. Thus, the safety is inherent in
the design, as it were. That said, I've seen safeties on some S&W
revolvers, and there is a company that makes a retrofit safety for them:

http://www.tarnhelm.com/murabito.html



Here's a little CZ concealed carry pistol with several safety features,
including an actual safety:

http://www.cz-usa.com/products/view/cz-2075-rami/