Good Christian Upbringing
 

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:47:52 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:37 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/14/2013 4:33 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:04:06 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 2:29 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 3/14/2013 12:45 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:59:30 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:05 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:29:55 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child ino the
world.

Think about that.

There is always birth control and the morning after pill.


====

Clearly a good start but for various reasons some women do not have
access to either option. Of course one of the reasons for limited
access is that your church has been adamant about trying to suppress
availability.


Lame excuse Wayne. If they were creative enough to gain access to the
old woodie, against church doctrine, they should be able to gain
access
to remedies for their sins.

====

And therein lies the problem: Viewing pregnancy and childbirth as a
punishment. That's a very old fasioned notion which has been
carefully fostered by various societies and religions throughout the
ages. We already have more than enough unwanted children running
around with little or no parental leadership. It is a mystery to me
why anyone would wish for more.


You weren't listening. There are remedies that make conception,
abortion
or childbirth unnecessary.

And they are available to everybody, period...

No they aren't ****forbrains.


Yeah they are sperm breath...

Sperm breath? Has Harry been trying to recycle condoms again?

You and ****forbrains are quite a pair.

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:39:30 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:35 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:05:43 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 2:29 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 3/14/2013 12:45 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:59:30 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:05 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:29:55 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child ino the world.

Think about that.

There is always birth control and the morning after pill.


====

Clearly a good start but for various reasons some women do not have
access to either option. Of course one of the reasons for limited
access is that your church has been adamant about trying to suppress
availability.


Lame excuse Wayne. If they were creative enough to gain access to the
old woodie, against church doctrine, they should be able to gain access
to remedies for their sins.

====

And therein lies the problem: Viewing pregnancy and childbirth as a
punishment. That's a very old fasioned notion which has been
carefully fostered by various societies and religions throughout the
ages. We already have more than enough unwanted children running
around with little or no parental leadership. It is a mystery to me
why anyone would wish for more.


You weren't listening. There are remedies that make conception, abortion
or childbirth unnecessary.

Or should I say, the church isn't stopping anybody from getting
them...The intolerant just want to force the church to offer it too,
then they will be satisifed because of course, they personally hold no
value in "our" free agency to worship as we see fit...

You're ****ing stupid. The church has nothing to do with it. It's a
requirement built into the health insurance plan, including for
non-Christians who work there.


So go to the drug store and buy them for 9 dollars a month, or have them
given to you by the clinic... nobody is being stopped from access to
birth control. You just want the church to pay for it too, because you
don't believe in their freedom to worship..

Well, it's pretty obvious that you can't read. No law is saying they
have to pay for it ****forbrans.

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:02:52 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:56 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 3/14/2013 2:29 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 3/14/2013 12:45 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:59:30 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:05 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:29:55 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child ino the world.

Think about that.

There is always birth control and the morning after pill.


====

Clearly a good start but for various reasons some women do not have
access to either option. Of course one of the reasons for limited
access is that your church has been adamant about trying to suppress
availability.


Lame excuse Wayne. If they were creative enough to gain access to the
old woodie, against church doctrine, they should be able to gain access
to remedies for their sins.

====

And therein lies the problem: Viewing pregnancy and childbirth as a
punishment. That's a very old fasioned notion which has been
carefully fostered by various societies and religions throughout the
ages. We already have more than enough unwanted children running
around with little or no parental leadership. It is a mystery to me
why anyone would wish for more.


You weren't listening. There are remedies that make conception, abortion
or childbirth unnecessary.

Or should I say, the church isn't stopping anybody from getting
them...The intolerant just want to force the church to offer it too,
then they will be satisifed because of course, they personally hold no
value in "our" free agency to worship as we see fit...

You call others intolerant when it's the Christians that don't want to
give a woman a right to choose?????


You have the right to choose.. The only ones effected are women who
"choose" the church... but then again, we know you don't want to give
folks the choice in that matter...

No. you're an idiot and got your news from fox again.

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:41:31 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:36 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:13:51 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 1:07 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:29:55 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:53:13 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:40:32 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I believe that's where you and our new Pope disagree. He probably equates abortions with the killing
of a precious infant, whereas you seem to equate it with cutting down a weed in your yard.

You know, weed inconvenient? Kill it.

===

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child ino the world.

Think about that.

There is always birth control and the morning after pill.


Salmonbait

There would be except that there's a pretty vocal minority on the
right that would ban those things also.


And just how do you suggest those few folks are going to succeed in
stopping even one American from access to Birth Control? It's Christian
Derangement Syndrome again...

You never heard of the fillibuster? Christian derangement is right.


Liar... filibuster (and that's how it's spelled) has to do with what.
There is nothing to filibuster, women already have open and full access
to birth control, period.

I'll spell it any way I ****ing want ****forbrains. You're living in a
hole and don't watch the news .. what a dumbbunny.

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:42:15 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:36 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:29:53 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:09 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:45:52 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:30 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:40 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:11:23 PM UTC-5, jps wrote:

bull**** snipped

My kids are still in the me, me, me stage but they're still not as

selfish as the wingers in rec.boats.

Naturally you are talking about the selfishness of the left-wingers who enjoy pilfering from the pockets of the right and everyone in between.

Naturally you need to remove your finger from your ass. Your prostate
is fine.

These idiots can't stand that a liberal has been successful at
business and still wants to lend support to folks who haven't been as
lucky.

The Republican mantra: I've got mine, **** you.

Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives?


Salmonbait

No. I think that true conservatives (people unlike you) are equally
charitable.


Nobody asked you, we already know what you are going to say.... it's
getting old.

Too ****ing bad for you bittyballs.


Do you giggle when you type that **** kevin?

Who the **** is kevin? You're 6' tall white rabbit?

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:36:05 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:36:59 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:29:53 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:09 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:45:52 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:30 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:40 -0700, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:11:23 PM UTC-5, jps wrote:

bull**** snipped

My kids are still in the me, me, me stage but they're still not as

selfish as the wingers in rec.boats.

Naturally you are talking about the selfishness of the left-wingers who enjoy pilfering from the pockets of the right and everyone in between.

Naturally you need to remove your finger from your ass. Your prostate
is fine.

These idiots can't stand that a liberal has been successful at
business and still wants to lend support to folks who haven't been as
lucky.

The Republican mantra: I've got mine, **** you.

Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives?


Salmonbait

No. I think that true conservatives (people unlike you) are equally
charitable.


Nobody asked you, we already know what you are going to say.... it's
getting old.

Too ****ing bad for you bittyballs.

YMML.

Are you typing in tongues? hheh

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On 3/14/2013 7:59 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:02:52 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 3/14/2013 4:56 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 3/14/2013 2:29 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 3/14/2013 12:45 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:59:30 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:05 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:29:55 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child ino the world.

Think about that.

There is always birth control and the morning after pill.


====

Clearly a good start but for various reasons some women do not have
access to either option. Of course one of the reasons for limited
access is that your church has been adamant about trying to suppress
availability.


Lame excuse Wayne. If they were creative enough to gain access to the
old woodie, against church doctrine, they should be able to gain access
to remedies for their sins.

====

And therein lies the problem: Viewing pregnancy and childbirth as a
punishment. That's a very old fasioned notion which has been
carefully fostered by various societies and religions throughout the
ages. We already have more than enough unwanted children running
around with little or no parental leadership. It is a mystery to me
why anyone would wish for more.


You weren't listening. There are remedies that make conception, abortion
or childbirth unnecessary.

Or should I say, the church isn't stopping anybody from getting
them...The intolerant just want to force the church to offer it too,
then they will be satisifed because of course, they personally hold no
value in "our" free agency to worship as we see fit...

You call others intolerant when it's the Christians that don't want to
give a woman a right to choose?????


You have the right to choose.. The only ones effected are women who
"choose" the church... but then again, we know you don't want to give
folks the choice in that matter...

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On 3/14/2013 7:25 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 3/14/2013 5:55 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 3/14/2013 4:53 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 3/14/2013 12:45 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:59:30 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 3/14/2013 8:05 AM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:29:55 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

No woman should be forced to bring an unwanted child ino the
world.

Think about that.

There is always birth control and the morning after pill.


====

Clearly a good start but for various reasons some women do not have
access to either option. Of course one of the reasons for limited
access is that your church has been adamant about trying to suppress
availability.


Lame excuse Wayne. If they were creative enough to gain access to the
old woodie, against church doctrine, they should be able to gain
access
to remedies for their sins.
t
====

And therein lies the problem: Viewing pregnancy and childbirth as a

punishment. That's a very old fasioned notion which has been
carefully fostered by various societies and religions throughout the
ages. We already have more than enough unwanted children running
around with little or no parental leadership. It is a mystery to me
why anyone would wish for more.


And therein lies the strawman... I think John was addressing the same
lame "church supression" jab you made making your point. It's bs unless
you can tell us just exactly where in the US outside the walls of the
churches, "Church Suppression" is keeping women from getting birth
control pills or having an abortion?

I know you don't like facts, but:

http://www.womenshealthmag.com/healt...control-rights

http://www.unmaskingchoice.ca/active/churches



There, I read one of your links and it's bs... First off the lady is
"terrified" that she won't have the 150 dollars every two years for a
birth control shot, and then we find out she can get it for 59 dollars
anyway at Planned Abortionhood... So, still, no examples of any woman
that can not get birth control because of Religion... Just more hype.



You got suckered into following the idiot's link. That'll learn ya.

Yup, forgot he doesn't read them first himself...

Good Christian Upbringing
 

On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring
wrote:

I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.

====

Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few
instances of rape and incest.

How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who
falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the
Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of
civilization.


Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more
realistic than your loogieism above...