|
Good Christian Upbringing
|
Good Christian Upbringing
On 3/15/2013 9:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring wrote: I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant. ==== Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few instances of rape and incest. How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of civilization. Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more realistic than your loogieism above... === The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned parenthood out of business. So, there are no women in the US who can not get birth control because of the Church... got it. |
Good Christian Upbringing
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:24:07 -0400, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring wrote: I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant. ==== Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few instances of rape and incest. How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of civilization. Morning-after pill or RU-486. Who said anything about punishing, stoning, or peddling sharia law? Kinda goin' off the deep end there, Wayne. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! |
Good Christian Upbringing
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:47:12 -0400, Wayne B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring wrote: I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant. ==== Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few instances of rape and incest. How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of civilization. Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more realistic than your loogieism above... === The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned parenthood out of business. I have nothing against Planned Parenthood, as long as they don't kill babies. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! |
Good Christian Upbringing
On Mar 14, 6:58*pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 3/14/13 6:06 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:37:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/14/13 4:21 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:13:57 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/14/13 3:45 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:30 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:40 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:11:23 PM UTC-5, jps wrote: bull**** snipped My kids are still in the me, me, me stage but they're still not as selfish as the wingers in rec.boats. Naturally you are talking about the selfishness of the left-wingers who enjoy pilfering from the pockets of the right and everyone in between. Naturally you need to remove your finger from your ass. Your prostate is fine. These idiots can't stand that a liberal has been successful at business and still wants to lend support to folks who haven't been as lucky. The Republican mantra: I've got mine, **** you. Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives? Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! I's sure conservative born-agains contribute mightily to their churches, but most of those bucks ain't going to the poor. Have you reviewed the budgets of the churches to which you refer? What about conservatives who aren't 'born-agains' ? Most Christians I know are not 'born-agains'. In fact, I don't believe I know one in that category. But, you didn't answer the question. Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives? The question was posed because of the apparent allegation made by jps. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! I don't consider "charity" giving to a church that uses the funds for edifices or salaries of its clergy, or for proselytizing. Charity supposedly is to help the poor with food, shelter, medical care, clothing, et cetera. So, when you deduct conservative christian charitable giving that isn't used to provide direct assistance to the poor, the amount of giving goes way, way down. Giving money to one's church so it can send "missionaries" to Central and South America to convert Catholics into Protestants isn't charitable giving. Neither is giving money to convert "pagans" into Christians. It's proselytizing and, as such, money used for those purposes shouldn't be considered charity or eligible for charitable deduction. And the question remains unanswered. Never mind. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! No, I don't believe conservatives are more prone to give to legitimate charities whose sole purpose is to help the poor or the sick or the homeless. Well, I believe you're wrong, but that's OK. |
Good Christian Upbringing
On 3/15/2013 10:05 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:47:12 -0400, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:22:42 -0400, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote: On 3/14/2013 8:24 PM, Wayne B wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:58:48 -0400, J Herring wrote: I'd say, if you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant. ==== Easy to say but there are lots of "accidents" and more than a few instances of rape and incest. How do you fix that? Or do you still want to punish the woman who falls victim to such thngs? Why not stone her to death like the Taliban? You are peddling sharia law behind the cloak of civilization. Or let her walk into a planned parenthood office.. Might be a bit more realistic than your loogieism above... === The religious right is doing everything they can to put planned parenthood out of business. I have nothing against Planned Parenthood, as long as they don't kill babies. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! I would be happy if they would allow alternative viewpoints within the walls there.. but freedom of speech and taxation with representation is only for the left... |
Good Christian Upbringing
On 3/15/2013 10:12 AM, John H wrote:
On Mar 14, 6:58 pm, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/14/13 6:06 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:37:52 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/14/13 4:21 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:13:57 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote: On 3/14/13 3:45 PM, J Herring wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:37:30 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:17:40 -0700, Urin Asshole wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:59:33 -0700 (PDT), Tom Nofinger wrote: On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:11:23 PM UTC-5, jps wrote: bull**** snipped My kids are still in the me, me, me stage but they're still not as selfish as the wingers in rec.boats. Naturally you are talking about the selfishness of the left-wingers who enjoy pilfering from the pockets of the right and everyone in between. Naturally you need to remove your finger from your ass. Your prostate is fine. These idiots can't stand that a liberal has been successful at business and still wants to lend support to folks who haven't been as lucky. The Republican mantra: I've got mine, **** you. Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives? Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! I's sure conservative born-agains contribute mightily to their churches, but most of those bucks ain't going to the poor. Have you reviewed the budgets of the churches to which you refer? What about conservatives who aren't 'born-agains' ? Most Christians I know are not 'born-agains'. In fact, I don't believe I know one in that category. But, you didn't answer the question. Do you believe that liberals, in general, are more charitable than conservatives? The question was posed because of the apparent allegation made by jps. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! I don't consider "charity" giving to a church that uses the funds for edifices or salaries of its clergy, or for proselytizing. Charity supposedly is to help the poor with food, shelter, medical care, clothing, et cetera. So, when you deduct conservative christian charitable giving that isn't used to provide direct assistance to the poor, the amount of giving goes way, way down. Giving money to one's church so it can send "missionaries" to Central and South America to convert Catholics into Protestants isn't charitable giving. Neither is giving money to convert "pagans" into Christians. It's proselytizing and, as such, money used for those purposes shouldn't be considered charity or eligible for charitable deduction. And the question remains unanswered. Never mind. Salmonbait -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! No, I don't believe conservatives are more prone to give to legitimate charities whose sole purpose is to help the poor or the sick or the homeless. Well, I believe you're wrong, but that's OK. There have been studies.. The difference is huge... |
Good Christian Upbringing
|
Good Christian Upbringing
|
Good Christian Upbringing
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 00:59:48 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Urin Asshole" wrote in message .. . Women barely have the right. It's being eroded every day. Of course, a ****forbrains like you don't actually know that because you watch fake news. I mean fox news. ------------------------------- You forgot three or four "****s". I was having a good day. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com