About Us

Urin Asshole

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:34:14 -0500, wrote:

On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:50:06 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
. ..

And everybody in the room was signed up for the other's objective. It
all made sense to them but it was a giant miscalculation. They were
all looking for an excuse to invade Iraq, long before 911.

-----------------------------------------

Indeed. The stage was set back in 1998 when then President Clinton
signed the "Iraq Liberation Act" which passed the House by a vote of
360 to 38 and by the Senate by unanimous consent. The Act essentially
established a policy for regime change in Iraq. Here's what Clinton
had to say back then:

"Iraq admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare
capability, notably, 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes
botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud
warheads; and 157 aerial bombs. And I might say UNSCOM inspectors
believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production....
Over the past few months, as [the weapons inspectors] have come closer
and closer to rooting out Iraq's remaining nuclear capacity, Saddam
has undertaken yet another gambit to thwart their ambitions by
imposing debilitating conditions on the inspectors and declaring key
sites which have still not been inspected off limits.... It is obvious
that there is an attempt here, based on the whole history of this
operation since 1991, to protect whatever remains of his capacity to
produce weapons of mass destruction, the missiles to deliver them, and
the feed stocks necessary to produce them. The UNSCOM inspectors
believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological
munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to
restart quickly its production program and build many, many more
weapons.... Now, let's imagine the future. What if he fails to comply
and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives
him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass
destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and
continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will
conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will
then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an
arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I
guarantee you he'll use the arsenal...." .... President Bill Clinton,
1998

One could say that Clinton talked the talk but Bush walked the walk.

People want to forget that.

More bull****. Clinton got the job done in Iraq and Saddam was
contained. In fact, he'd give up his quest for WMDs, but Bush didn't
give a **** and lied so we could invade.

The only thing Clinton got wrong was that Saddam would use them.

Dumb****s on the right want to forget that.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What the hell is going on in the US?	[email protected]	General	0	April 24th 09 01:06 AM
What the hell is going on...	Boater	General	3	November 6th 08 01:49 AM
What the hell?	Short Wave Sportfishing[_2_]	General	9	August 16th 08 01:54 AM
What the Hell????	Bobsprit	ASA	12	August 28th 04 01:40 AM
What the Hell is That?	Simple Simon	ASA	2	August 26th 03 10:47 PM

Menu

About Us