| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 08:58:34 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"F.O.A.D." wrote in message ... On 2/26/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote: The Iraq war was initiated because our intelligence, the intelligence of our allies, the leadership of Iraq, and our Congress believed or announced the building and storage of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Salmonbait -- That's just Herring lying to perpetuate the Bush Administration's lies. The Bush Administration and its neocon supplicants cooked the intel out of Iraq and cooked it over and over and over, and fed false intel to our allies, too. This has been discussed openly for years, the Brits have discussed how they were duped by cooked intel. The sad thing is that the righties are still trying to rewrite the reality of the Bush Administration's bull**** that got us into Iran. -------------------------------------------------------------- So, what was his motivations to "cook" the intel and "lie" to the nation and the world? I remember hearing, "It's all about the oil". No evidence of that ever came to be. I remember hearing, "Revenge for trying to assassinate his father". No real evidence of that, other than speculation by some. I remember hearing, "It's Cheney getting Hallibuton contracts" . Yes, Hallibuton got contracts but they were the only company with the resources to do them. So, what's the real reason Bush cooked the intel and lied to the world? Seems to me that even he is smart enough to realize what the historical and personal ramifications would be if he knowingly lied and conducted a war for personal reasons. I just can't buy that. If he cooked the intel, then so did many others, including many Republicans and Democrats in the Senate who saw the same reports, acquired domestically and by our allies. What was Bush doing, sitting at his computer, modifying the raw data and releasing it to Congress? The justification was different for every player. For Bush it was the insult to his dad and the fact that dad had screwed the Iraqis in the first gulf war. For Cheney it was the oil. If they could have controlled the outcome of the war and installed their puppet government, they could have controlled a ****load of oil. For Rumsfeld, who the **** knows. The guy is an asshole. For the Zionists (Wolfowitz and Pearl), it was to protect Israel. And everybody in the room was signed up for the other's objective. It all made sense to them but it was a giant miscalculation. They were all looking for an excuse to invade Iraq, long before 911. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What the hell is going on in the US? | General | |||
| What the hell is going on... | General | |||
| What the hell? | General | |||
| What the Hell???? | ASA | |||
| What the Hell is That? | ASA | |||