On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud
of yourself you are... LOL...

On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible

That's pretty much all you do here, little ****.

On 2/3/2013 9:15 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible

That's pretty much all you do here, little ****.


Wow, I'm hurt..

On 2/3/13 9:16 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 9:15 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/3/13 9:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's
where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible

That's pretty much all you do here, little ****.


Wow, I'm hurt..

Doubtful your peanut brain works well enough to feel pain.

On Feb 3, 7:04*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can
buy car insurance?

On 2/3/2013 11:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:04 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can
buy car insurance?


It's all about the slippery slope to dems, all a compromise means is we
are gonna' reload and come for the rest...

On 2/3/2013 11:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:04 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can
buy car insurance?

I guess they'll have to resort to stealing them instead.

On 2/4/2013 12:10 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/3/2013 11:09 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:04 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can
buy car insurance?


It's all about the slippery slope to dems, all a compromise means is we
are gonna' reload and come for the rest...

Insurance? No habla engles senor.

In article 15dacf33-ad36-406e-90ce-
, says...

On Feb 3, 7:04*pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:
This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

Dick Durbin is an idiot.

Is that like allowing illegals to have drivers licenses so they can
buy car insurance?

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:19:47 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....


If you are thinking about firearm manufacturers, this will not affect
them much either way. The "ban" is meaningless to them, more than
simply fine tuning the cosmetics of the line.

I wonder why the NRA is working so hard on their behalf then?

This is as silly as banning cars with racing stripes to cut down on
speeding.

Well, no. But that is a silly argument.

... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

All hail to the NRA.....