Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#112
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#113
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On 2/6/2013 3:15 PM, Salmonbait wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:43:58 -0600, wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:10:47 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: I think they are saying, why not start enforcing the laws we have before we pass a bunch more? Amen. Especially when the 'bunch more' would do nothing to prevent slaughters like Sandy Hook (by the liberals' own admission). These people don't want a reasonable solution, they just want the issue. The only real solution that would satisfy them is the total removal of firearms from the public by any means necessary. If you talk to them long enough that finally gets blurted out. Yup. Just leaving guns in the hands of criminals would be the solution - as long as there was a huge government agency to make sure the law-abiding citizens didn't have guns. Salmonbait -- 'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument! You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion. That's the plan.. Cite, liar? |
#114
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/6/13 3:15 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:43:58 -0600, wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:10:47 -0500, Salmonbait wrote: I think they are saying, why not start enforcing the laws we have before we pass a bunch more? Amen. Especially when the 'bunch more' would do nothing to prevent slaughters like Sandy Hook (by the liberals' own admission). These people don't want a reasonable solution, they just want the issue. The only real solution that would satisfy them is the total removal of firearms from the public by any means necessary. If you talk to them long enough that finally gets blurted out. Yup. Just leaving guns in the hands of criminals would be the solution - as long as there was a huge government agency to make sure the law-abiding citizens didn't have guns. Salmonbait -- Let's see...you spent most of your active working life working for the U.S. Army, a huge government agency, then you worked for the Fairfax County school system, another huge government agency, and your wife worked as a civilian for the federal government... ....and you are opposed to government agencies. You need to spend a lot less time in the tanning booth. |
#115
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/6/2013 11:10 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:23:56 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 2/6/13 4:22 PM, wrote: That isn't happening, but...it's a good goal, so long as it includes "everyone." That is what the bumper sticker is all about "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns". Heroin has been outlawed for the best part of a century and outlaws don't seem to have any trouble getting it. Do we really want to push the gun business underground? Then we become Mexico. Everyone means everyone. OK them first It would only make sense to take them all from the illegal owners first. But sense is not what the democrats are looking for, the end game is disarming the citizens... period. |
#116
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/7/13 12:05 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/6/2013 11:10 PM, wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:23:56 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 2/6/13 4:22 PM, wrote: That isn't happening, but...it's a good goal, so long as it includes "everyone." That is what the bumper sticker is all about "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns". Heroin has been outlawed for the best part of a century and outlaws don't seem to have any trouble getting it. Do we really want to push the gun business underground? Then we become Mexico. Everyone means everyone. OK them first It would only make sense to take them all from the illegal owners first. But sense is not what the democrats are looking for, the end game is disarming the citizens... period. Your psychotic paranoia is amusing. |
#117
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... On 2/6/2013 11:10 PM, wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:23:56 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 2/6/13 4:22 PM, wrote: That isn't happening, but...it's a good goal, so long as it includes "everyone." That is what the bumper sticker is all about "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns". Heroin has been outlawed for the best part of a century and outlaws don't seem to have any trouble getting it. Do we really want to push the gun business underground? Then we become Mexico. Everyone means everyone. OK them first It would only make sense to take them all from the illegal owners first. But sense is not what the democrats are looking for, the end game is disarming the citizens... period. Holy ****, you are bat **** insane...... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Feinstein's list of banned guns... | General | |||
now banned.. | General | |||
now banned.. | General | |||
Banned? | General | |||
now banned.. | General |