Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find
it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg

or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys



Salmonbait

--

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**

On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find
it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg

or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys



Salmonbait


Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your
safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol.

On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote:
Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find

it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today:



http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg



or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys







Salmonbait



--



**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government

take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**


They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever.

On 2/3/2013 8:29 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like
going thru all the posts to find
it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of
its articles today:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg


or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys



Salmonbait


Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your
safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol.

Are all your guns equipped with hammers and manual safetys?

In article om,
says...

On 2/3/2013 8:29 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like
going thru all the posts to find
it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of
its articles today:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg


or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys



Salmonbait


Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your
safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol.

Are all your guns equipped with hammers and manual safetys?

Harry's probably has the problem of putting his finger on the trigger
of his pistol to help him pull it ouf of the holster. Harry may be tired
of patching holes in his floor, foot, vanity, sink and mirror.

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:26:43 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find
it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg

or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys



Salmonbait

This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.

Yeah, we should do nothing and let the NRA decide.....

On 2/3/13 2:03 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 03 Feb 2013 08:26:43 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find
it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg

or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys



Salmonbait

This is meaningless feel good legislation to prove they are "doing
something".
The manufactures have "post ban" designs ready to go as soon as they
see which of these rules survive the vote.
The Bushmaster that everyone is vilifying is a 94 ban compliant gun
designed to that rule.


Frankly, I don't give a **** about Bushmaster rifles or what the NRA
wants. As far as I can tell from the last few months of public
discussion, the NRA is an outfit of whores whose only real interest is
in boosting and protecting the sales of its corporate "partners."

On Sunday, February 3, 2013 8:41:45 AM UTC-5, Meyer wrote:
On 2/3/2013 8:29 AM, ESAD wrote:

On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like

going thru all the posts to find

it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of

its articles today:



http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg





or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys







Salmonbait





Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your

safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol.



Are all your guns equipped with hammers and manual safetys?

His guns came with a vest, cowboy boots and a tin badge. Like this:

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.costumecraze.com/images/vendors/fashion/740235-Best-in-the-West-Sheriff-Costume-large.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.costumecraze.com/WEST142.html&h=1149&w=600&sz=79&tbnid=UV7r7w99tb4B cM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=47&zoom=1&usg=__0tnTmGCrYVaCxhZIM QUwxiPypss=&docid=vGZIm0sy-PRGOM&sa=X&ei=hrAOUcLTCYba9ATCj4H4Dw&ved=0CGoQ9QEw Ag&dur=70

On 2/3/2013 1:47 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 8:41:45 AM UTC-5, Meyer wrote:
On 2/3/2013 8:29 AM, ESAD wrote:

On 2/3/13 8:26 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like

going thru all the posts to find

it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of

its articles today:



http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg





or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys







Salmonbait





Not to worry, you'll still be able to have a gun accident with your

safetyless, decockerless, striker pistol.



Are all your guns equipped with hammers and manual safetys?

His guns came with a vest, cowboy boots and a tin badge. Like this:

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://img.costumecraze.com/images/vendors/fashion/740235-Best-in-the-West-Sheriff-Costume-large.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.costumecraze.com/WEST142.html&h=1149&w=600&sz=79&tbnid=UV7r7w99tb4B cM:&tbnh=90&tbnw=47&zoom=1&usg=__0tnTmGCrYVaCxhZIM QUwxiPypss=&docid=vGZIm0sy-PRGOM&sa=X&ei=hrAOUcLTCYba9ATCj4H4Dw&ved=0CGoQ9QEw Ag&dur=70


Oh man, I had one of those... and I didn't even turn into a gun nut

In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.