On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in
his closet.

You are a crook, defend that...

So aren't you then.


Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the
drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was
your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed??

Please give specific answers to your accusations:

What "drinking problem"?
What are you talking about "grills on the porch"?
What daughter?
What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about?

I'll be waiting.


You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have...

On 2/4/2013 10:44 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/2013 8:46 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/3/2013 9:01 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.




This is called a shotgun post. Throw as many offensive, stupid
accusations into one post as possible, then sit back and think how proud
of yourself you are... LOL...

And then Insane Scotty will reply ****ting on the post, but not, of
course, arguing any of the facts presented.


Why would I argue such nonsense...Am I supposed to address the "Cracker
gun nuts"....or point out that "Jerry rigging" is the dems specialty, or
"old white men..."

It's not a statement or a question, it's more harryisms, just trying to
see how far into the insult paragraph folks will read...

Idiot.


Yeah, that's as far as I usually get into your posts.. one word till you
prove you have nothing to add..

If you didn't get the statement, it's not my fault, moron.


No, it's just that I don't take you seriously.. you are a joke, a troll.

On 2/4/13 10:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is,
hiding in
his closet.

You are a crook, defend that...

So aren't you then.


Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the
drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was
your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed??

Please give specific answers to your accusations:

What "drinking problem"?
What are you talking about "grills on the porch"?
What daughter?
What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about?

I'll be waiting.


You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have...


Are you trying to blackmail him, Snotty?

On 2/4/2013 10:42 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Monday, February 4, 2013 10:23:57 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:30:07 -0800 (PST), True North wrote:



On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:26:43 AM UTC-4, Salmonbait wrote:

Some asked for this after I first posted it, but I didn't feel like going thru all the posts to find



it. Well, here it is again. The Washington Post had the link in one of its articles today:







http://www.washingtonpost.com/rw/201...trategy25a.jpg







or: http://tinyurl.com/a2dtoys















Salmonbait







--







**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government



take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**





They forgot to include all handguns...whether revolver, semi-auto or whatever.



Tell your butt buddy!





Salmonbait



--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!



You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your

parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion.


"butt buddy", Johnny??
Sorry, I don't subscribe to your sexual deviances.

Funny how Herring's signature has something about name calling liberals,
but it's okay for him to do so....


stop your crying... bitch

On 2/4/2013 10:51 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 10:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes
after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is,
hiding in
his closet.

You are a crook, defend that...

So aren't you then.


Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the
drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was
your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her bed??

Please give specific answers to your accusations:

What "drinking problem"?
What are you talking about "grills on the porch"?
What daughter?
What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about?

I'll be waiting.


You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have...


Are you trying to blackmail him, Snotty?

Do you know what blackmail is?

On 2/4/13 11:05 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 10:51 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 10:49 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:58 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 2/4/2013 9:06 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes
after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is,
hiding in
his closet.

You are a crook, defend that...

So aren't you then.


Nope, not running from my bills, not hiding assets... So, how's the
drinking problem going, leave any grills on the porch, how scared was
your daughter when your carelessness almost burned her out of her
bed??

Please give specific answers to your accusations:

What "drinking problem"?
What are you talking about "grills on the porch"?
What daughter?
What "burned her out of her bed" are you talking about?

I'll be waiting.


You know, the daughter you don't have, then have, then don't have...


Are you trying to blackmail him, Snotty?

Do you know what blackmail is?


Obviously, *you* are the expert in that area, little twerp. For the
life of me, though, I can't figure why or how you would be the object of
"blackmail."

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:01:04 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ,
says...


... but democrats are famous for "doing something" even if it is
wrong. All this bill is going to do is endanger "blue" seats in
congress.

NRA bull****. Cracker and gun nut numbers are already established.
None of fluster over guns will make a difference in Mississippi, or
San Francisco. Or Pennsylvania.
Stricter gun control will only increase the D vote, because that's where
Americans are.
Only thing that will keep the R's alive nationally now is if they use
their state legislatures to jerry rig the electoral college.
Then they'll get thrown out of state power too.
Face it, old white men with 19th century ideas are a soon to be dead
species as far as wielding political power.
And that's a good thing for everybody else.



I suppose internet protocol says I should bet you $10,000 or something
but I think you are wrong.


No surprise you channel Mitt Romney. That's exactly his protocol.
He also denied the polls until the vote was in.


Second amendment voters are not all in Mississippi. They are well
represented in the purple states and that is really where the swing
congressional votes are.

Got nothing to do with the second. The SC Heller ruling settled that,
and any new law will go through the SC for judgement.
What would you bet they won't allow the same licensing restrictions on
guns that already exist for car?
It's about gun nuts not wanting to take responsibility for their guns.
And you're just another gun nut.
That's the simple truth of it.

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:09:47 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Dick Durbin says- "Background checks will stop criminals from buying
weapons in the first place."

If they want to test the water on this, they could just open the
background check up to the public and see what response they get.
After all, if I want to sell a gun, nobody knows I have, to my
neighbor, compliance would be voluntary anyway.


Since when did following the law becomes "voluntary?"
Is that a gun nut precept?

Right now I have no way of submitting a background check even if I
wanted to. That is the loophole in the current law.

This brings up another issue. Is there a privacy issue of opening up
criminal and mental health records to any curious person who says he
might want to sell a gun to someone?
If you wanted to dig some dirt on your neighbor, just submit a
firearms background check. You could always say the sale fell through
after you got the information.

Plain ignorance there. A NICS check requires the purchaser to fill out
ATF form 4473. The only "dirt" that comes back from NICS is "Proceed,"
"Deny," or "Delay."
And if they require background checks on the federal level, they'll
probably use a version of California's example, where a trip to a FFL
and a NICS check are already required for ALL gun sales. It's a simple
matter of seller and buyer showing up at any FFL, filling out the form,
and the FFL runs the NICS check. The FFL charges 10 bucks.
There's only one problem with that. NRA and you gun nuts don't like it.
Because it makes you take responsibility for not selling your gun to a
criminal or crazy.
That removes criminals and crazy folks from you buyer pool.
Not good for sales.
Nothing to do with keeping guns away from criminals.
You gun nuts aren't fooling anybody except the gullible.
But checking all guns sales through NICS is a small part and won't
happen anyway. Need some more mass shootings and much more gun violence
to get folks irritated enough.
Might happen, might not. I suspect when and if decent folks gets fed up
with you gun nuts they will demand registration + NICS.

On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 10:21:13 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

checking all guns sales through NICS

===

There are a number of problems with checking all gun sales through
NCIS:

1. Over time it becomes comparable to a national gun registration
system which is not what the founding fathers intended when they wrote
the constitution.

2. Only law abiding citizens who have no intention of abusing their
gun rights will comply. For those with criminal intent it will still
be business as usual and a thriving black market will come into
existence.

In article ,
says...

On 2/4/13 10:28 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 9:07 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 9:02 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/4/2013 8:56 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 2/4/13 8:52 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:



"Jailbreaking an iPhone is illegal."

-Stupid Scotty


"****ing ten year olds is legal", Mr. Dr.

Ahh, as usual, Stupid Scotty can't defend his ideas, so he goes after
people who don't post here, smelly little coward that he is, hiding in
his closet.

You are a crook, defend that...


You're a funny little man. There's nothing "crooked" about jailbreaking
a phone. It is perfectly legal.

Turn on the light in that little closet of yours, and come out into the
sunshine.

Why did you jail break it? Who's resources or intellectual property are
you stealing?


I haven't jailbroken my iphone 5 yet, because the JB, which reportedly
was going to be released yesterday, is now scheduled to be released
today. Hopefully.

I did JB my iphone 4S, which I no longer own.

I ran:

Killbackground, which kills all background tasks.

iBlacklist, which I paid $12 for, and "blacklists" calls from
individuals or organizations I consider annoying, such as repetitive
solicitations from telemarketers.

SBSettings, which allows me to have toggles for certain functions in a
pull down notification center.

Infinifolders, which allows me to add an infinite number of app icons to
individual folders.

That's pretty much it. The iBlacklist and SBsettings were my main JB
apps on my 4s.

Not a stolen app on the list.

Now, when are you coming out of the closet?

The IT specialist doesn't realize what Jailbreak does, won't every
understand either.