In article ,
says...

On 1/31/2013 8:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 1/30/2013 8:21 PM, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:54:05 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

Invalid premise HOW, dip****? Zimmerman took after the kid, did you
happen to hear, and thus understand the 911 tapes??? What is wrong with
making correct and true statements again?

Nobody who was there has ever said anything but that Zimmerman was
following Martin and that he had lost sight of him until Martin
approached Zimmerman.,
Everyone else is only guessing.


MY point proven again.. this is getting old. Words have meaning,
"accosted" was used in this case to deliberately set a false narrative
that thinking folks just shouldn't stipulate to. There is no evidence,
or even credible suggestion that Zimmerman "accosted" Martin, it's a
lie, it's a loogism.. Period.

He was "accosted" by Zimmerman,

No he wasn't, not one piece of evidenct to prove that. Words have
meaning, at most he was watched by Zimmerman...

Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.


Ever see this, idiot?

http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvo...zimmerman-map/

On 1/31/2013 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:34:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

There is a big difference between following someone and accosting
them.


Exactly.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:34:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

There is a big difference between following someone and accosting
them.

Here you go:

http://tinyurl.com/7vxtvg8

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,
Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.

http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-
zimmerman-path.jpg


That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.

It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and
jumped Zimmerman from behind.

Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.

In article ,
says...

On 1/31/2013 12:12 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:34:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



He was "accosted" by Zimmerman, Zimmerman is heard on the 911 tapes
saying he is going to follow him.

There is a big difference between following someone and accosting
them.


Exactly.

http://tinyurl.com/7vxtvg8

Moron. Are you really as stupid as you position yourself here or are you
just toying with everyone? I ask because you may very well be the
dumbest person I've ever encountered.

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,
Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.

http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-
zimmerman-path.jpg


That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.

It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and
jumped Zimmerman from behind.

Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.

Not by the liberal left anyway.
They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and
you admit he wasn't.

I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed
Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to
understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:15:16 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:


Ever see this?

http://bcclist.com/2012/03/27/trayvo...zimmerman-map/

I saw the Oliver Stone JFK movie too, that doesn't mean it is true.

Where is the Zapruder film?

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,
Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.

http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-
zimmerman-path.jpg


That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.

It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and
jumped Zimmerman from behind.

Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.

Not by the liberal left anyway.
They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and
you admit he wasn't.

Who said Martin was "harmless"? Far from it, he was defending himself.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,
Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.

http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-
zimmerman-path.jpg


That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.

It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and
jumped Zimmerman from behind.

Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.

Not by the liberal left anyway.
They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and
you admit he wasn't.

I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed
Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to
understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait

Well, it would to a moron who can't think.

On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-

zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.