On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-

zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

On Friday, February 1, 2013 9:34:05 AM UTC-5, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

They often prove his own assertions wrong.

JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-

zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is
labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a
glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said
it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big
disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain
that way.

On 2/1/2013 9:46 AM, wrote:
On Friday, February 1, 2013 9:34:05 AM UTC-5, JustWaitAFrekinMinute! wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

They often prove his own assertions wrong.


Ha, but I already know his assertions are lies...

On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-

zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is
labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a
glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said
it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big
disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain
that way.


This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult...

JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-

zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is
labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a
glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said
it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big
disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain
that way.


This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult...

You are far better at using foul language.

On 2/1/2013 10:26 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-

zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is
labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a
glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and said
it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big
disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain
that way.


This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult...

You are far better at using foul language.


Eat "what" and die? hypocrite...

On 2/1/13 10:46 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:26 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer
wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the
story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-


zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that
discussion and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the
map is
labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a
glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement"
and said
it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a
big
disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to
remain
that way.


This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level
insult...

You are far better at using foul language.


Eat "what" and die? hypocrite...



Bad sushi, of course.

On 2/1/13 10:18 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 10:00 AM, ESAD wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/1/2013 9:24 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 2:34:16 PM UTC-5, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:39:36 -0500, wrote:



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:06:37 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,

says...



On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:37:17 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:







The 911 tapes and Zimmerman's own words. THIS map tells the story,

Zimmerman cut through directly confronted Martin.



http://bcclist.files.wordpress.com/2...martin-george-

zimmerman-path.jpg





That is an "assumed" path. You know what ASSume means.



It works just as well if Martin was hiding in that courtyard and

jumped Zimmerman from behind.



Uh, no, it's NOT assumed.



Not by the liberal left anyway.

They assume Martin was harmless but we already had that discussion
and

you admit he wasn't.



I guess my eyes are getting really bad, but it *looks* like the map is
labeled. "Zimmerman's Assumed

Path" and "Trayvon's Assumed Path". That would lead anyone with a
glimmer of intelligence to

understand that the path is 'assumed'.


Salmonbait


'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Remember when loogy linked to a paper titled "Vision Statement" and
said
it contained hard facts about the smart grid? There seems to be a big
disconnect between what he reads and what he actually comprehends.


That's why I "never" bother with his links..

You don't bother with links because you are ignorant and prefer to remain
that way.


This coming from someone who can barely pen a third grade level insult...


This ^ from an undereducated moron who discusses cocksucking in front of
his daughter? Of course, she is probably used to gutterspeak in your
family.

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:10:08 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Who said Martin was "harmless"? Far from it, he was defending himself.

Not after the first punch when Zimmerman went down.

Cite?