Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On Jan 26, 3:44*pm, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:37:30 -0500, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:23:20 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:54:01 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:19:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Do you mean this?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sile...atest_big_lie/

If you are a terrorist, the sound of the gun is just part of the
terror.
Making a suppressor is so trivial that I doubt the law is that
effective anyway. You can register one for $200 if legality is your
thing and you are allowed to make your own without an FFL license..
see BATF Form .

If you are into expediency the 2 liter bottle is a serviceable
suppressor. Better is the 1.5" PVC pipe, stuffed with milk bottle tops
and a little steel wool. on the muzzle end.

Sounds like you're confusing flash suppressor with silencer.

Not at all.

Without actually fingering the guy I can say I have seen the PVC pipe
trick on a bull barrel Ruger MK 1.
It is an impressive reduction in report.
The 2 liter trick is just anecdotal.

I would call that a silencer as opposed to a flash suppressor, which is what's found on the M-16 for
example.

Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Like the cone on the end of a Lee Enfield "jungle carbine" It was
there but didn't work very well. I think all it did was send the noise
back to the enemy.

http://www.deactivated-guns.co.uk/im..._carbine_9.jpg

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On Jan 26, 11:56*pm, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:48:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:

When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.

Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

What do suppressors have to do with school shootings?

NFA firearms have been involved in virtually zero crime.

Not a thing! But you gotta admit the subject makes a great blabbing
point when you can't find much else to argue about .

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On 1/27/13 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:48:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

What do suppressors have to do with school shootings?

NFA firearms have been involved in virtually zero crime.



The point was that with the NRA pushing/pimping the sale of suppressors,
every thug will want one when he goes down to the neighborhood school
and shoots it up. And I wasn't talking about "machine guns" or
short-barrel shotguns. Note that I stated "when you mount one on your
semi-auto firearm." You brought up the NFA listed weaponry, not me.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:48:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

What do suppressors have to do with school shootings?

The NRA is supporting silencers as a way to ensure kid's hearing won't
be compromised.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On 1/27/2013 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:48:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

What do suppressors have to do with school shootings?

NFA firearms have been involved in virtually zero crime.


It's the MO for the progressives.. Make everything about everything...
Just like if a mass shooting with hand guns (like the first reports
said, and all the facts point to), and make it about Long guns that were
still in the trunk of the car:).. All because the pistol ban is coming
later:O

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On 1/27/13 10:06 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/27/2013 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:48:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

What do suppressors have to do with school shootings?

NFA firearms have been involved in virtually zero crime.


It's the MO for the progressives.. Make everything about everything...
Just like if a mass shooting with hand guns (like the first reports
said, and all the facts point to), and make it about Long guns that were
still in the trunk of the car:).. All because the pistol ban is coming
later:O


D'oh. You don't need a full auto firearm to "take advantage" of a
suppressor, **** for brains, and, in fact, it wasn't the point here.

The point was that the NRA is pimping for suppressor manufacturers, and
it isn't a stretch to envision you or someone like you shooting your way
into a school with a semi auto rifle and suppressor or a 9 mm and
suppressor and killing your way through a classroom, making a lot less
noise than you would with a non suppressed firearm.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

In article ,
says...

On 1/27/13 10:06 AM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/27/2013 12:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:48:34 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

What do suppressors have to do with school shootings?

NFA firearms have been involved in virtually zero crime.


It's the MO for the progressives.. Make everything about everything...
Just like if a mass shooting with hand guns (like the first reports
said, and all the facts point to), and make it about Long guns that were
still in the trunk of the car:).. All because the pistol ban is coming
later:O


D'oh. You don't need a full auto firearm to "take advantage" of a
suppressor, **** for brains, and, in fact, it wasn't the point here.

The point was that the NRA is pimping for suppressor manufacturers, and
it isn't a stretch to envision you or someone like you shooting your way
into a school with a semi auto rifle and suppressor or a 9 mm and
suppressor and killing your way through a classroom, making a lot less
noise than you would with a non suppressed firearm.

I wonder if he is really that stupid or just playing that way.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:45:05 -0500, Earl wrote:

ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/26/2013 3:48 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school,
and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

Yeah, how do the kids sound when you are molesting them?


That's your bag, not mine. Hell, you *look like* a child molester.

Oh, when's the coming out party?

You don't *look like* a tax cheat, yet you are.

What?

I've met him. He does.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 18:09:32 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Jan 26, 3:44*pm, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:37:30 -0500, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:23:20 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:54:01 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:19:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Do you mean this?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sile...atest_big_lie/

If you are a terrorist, the sound of the gun is just part of the
terror.
Making a suppressor is so trivial that I doubt the law is that
effective anyway. You can register one for $200 if legality is your
thing and you are allowed to make your own without an FFL license..
see BATF Form .

If you are into expediency the 2 liter bottle is a serviceable
suppressor. Better is the 1.5" PVC pipe, stuffed with milk bottle tops
and a little steel wool. on the muzzle end.

Sounds like you're confusing flash suppressor with silencer.

Not at all.

Without actually fingering the guy I can say I have seen the PVC pipe
trick on a bull barrel Ruger MK 1.
It is an impressive reduction in report.
The 2 liter trick is just anecdotal.

I would call that a silencer as opposed to a flash suppressor, which is what's found on the M-16 for
example.

Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Like the cone on the end of a Lee Enfield "jungle carbine" It was
there but didn't work very well. I think all it did was send the noise
back to the enemy.

http://www.deactivated-guns.co.uk/im..._carbine_9.jpg

That cone was a flash suppressor, not a silencer.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 00:59:14 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:44:14 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:37:30 -0500, wrote:



Without actually fingering the guy I can say I have seen the PVC pipe
trick on a bull barrel Ruger MK 1.
It is an impressive reduction in report.
The 2 liter trick is just anecdotal.

I would call that a silencer as opposed to a flash suppressor, which is what's found on the M-16 for
example.


You can call it anything you want but there is no such thing as a
silencer.(no matter what BATF says) It is a suppressor. It only
suppresses the report, it doesn't silence it.

The little thingy on the end of an M-16 barrel, for example, is a 'flash suppressor' - not a 'sound
suppressor' or 'silencer'. The conical thingy on the end of the Lee Enfield 'Jungle Carbine' is a
'flash suppressor', not a 'sound suppressor' or 'silencer'.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!