Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

In article ,
says...

On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

Hey, the little kid's ears won't hurt (according to the NRA) while they
are being slaughtered.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On 1/26/13 3:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/26/2013 3:48 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

Yeah, how do the kids sound when you are molesting them?


That's your bag, not mine. Hell, you *look like* a child molester.

Oh, when's the coming out party?

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

In article ,
says...

On 1/26/2013 3:48 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

Yeah, how do the kids sound when you are molesting them?

Go teach your daughter more about "sucking dicks", asshole.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:37:30 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:23:20 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:54:01 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:19:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Do you mean this?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sile...atest_big_lie/


If you are a terrorist, the sound of the gun is just part of the
terror.
Making a suppressor is so trivial that I doubt the law is that
effective anyway. You can register one for $200 if legality is your
thing and you are allowed to make your own without an FFL license..
see BATF Form .

If you are into expediency the 2 liter bottle is a serviceable
suppressor. Better is the 1.5" PVC pipe, stuffed with milk bottle tops
and a little steel wool. on the muzzle end.

Sounds like you're confusing flash suppressor with silencer.

Not at all.

Without actually fingering the guy I can say I have seen the PVC pipe
trick on a bull barrel Ruger MK 1.
It is an impressive reduction in report.
The 2 liter trick is just anecdotal.

I would call that a silencer as opposed to a flash suppressor, which is what's found on the M-16 for
example.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On 1/26/13 4:44 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 15:37:30 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:23:20 -0500, Salmonbait
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:54:01 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:19:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Do you mean this?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sile...atest_big_lie/


If you are a terrorist, the sound of the gun is just part of the
terror.
Making a suppressor is so trivial that I doubt the law is that
effective anyway. You can register one for $200 if legality is your
thing and you are allowed to make your own without an FFL license..
see BATF Form .

If you are into expediency the 2 liter bottle is a serviceable
suppressor. Better is the 1.5" PVC pipe, stuffed with milk bottle tops
and a little steel wool. on the muzzle end.

Sounds like you're confusing flash suppressor with silencer.

Not at all.

Without actually fingering the guy I can say I have seen the PVC pipe
trick on a bull barrel Ruger MK 1.
It is an impressive reduction in report.
The 2 liter trick is just anecdotal.

I would call that a silencer as opposed to a flash suppressor, which is what's found on the M-16 for
example.


Salmonbait

--

'Ignorance'...the conservative answer to everything of importance!


Suppressor can be used as a term to describe a device that minimizes
sound or flash or both.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 12:27 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 11:19:38 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

Do you mean this?

http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sile...atest_big_lie/


If you are a terrorist, the sound of the gun is just part of the
terror.
Making a suppressor is so trivial that I doubt the law is that
effective anyway. You can register one for $200 if legality is your
thing and you are allowed to make your own without an FFL license..
see BATF Form .

If you are into expediency the 2 liter bottle is a serviceable
suppressor. Better is the 1.5" PVC pipe, stuffed with milk bottle tops
and a little steel wool. on the muzzle end.

You're completely missing the point.....



Obviously, NRA-approved suppressors are for the kids, because...

When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it
and when you start shooting up classrooms full of kids and teachers,
no one will hear that, either, so the kids won't be upset by the sound
of firearms going off and killing their friends and teachers.

So, when you buy that suppressor, make sure it has the NRA Approved
for Kids Seal.
That's a dumb, but expected response from Harry the tax cheat.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

iBoaterer wrote:
Really? You didn't see the part about the NRA wants silencers so
allegedly the kids shooting guns don't get hearing problems? Do you not
find the outrageousness in this??
Please show us where you found this. It reeks of a tax-cheating Harrytale.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:58 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 1/26/2013 3:48 PM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/26/13 3:33 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:


When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school,
and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it

In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.


Well, that should make the sound of your schoolmates being slaughtered
much more acceptable.

Yeah, how do the kids sound when you are molesting them?


That's your bag, not mine. Hell, you *look like* a child molester.

Oh, when's the coming out party?

You don't *look like* a tax cheat, yet you are.

Interesting take on the history of the 2nd Amendment...
 

On Jan 26, 7:43*pm, Earl wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:45:10 -0500, ESAD wrote:

When you mount one on your semi-auto firearm, break into a school, and
shoot the armed but incompetent "Scotty Guard," no one will hear it
In spite of what you see in the movies, suppressed rifles are far from
silent. They sound more like the impact wrench at the tire store than
a BB gun.

I've seen some where all you can hear is the action of the rifle.

That's where down loaded ammunition comes in. to take the ballistic
down to a sub-sonic speed. Of course, you're limited on range, though