| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#51
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:55:33 -0500, wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:11:01 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , Once again, I'll ask. Are you really trying to tell people this is the whole bill? Yes and I am doing it without the 3d grade insults you can't seem to avoid when you are wrong. I wonder what names Kevin would call if he were ever right! |
|
#52
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
|
#54
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/7/13 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:06:37 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:11:01 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , Once again, I'll ask. Are you really trying to tell people this is the whole bill? Yes and I am doing it without the 3d grade insults you can't seem to avoid when you are wrong. The reality is that no "Sandy Relief Bill" passed. The Bill that passed simply temporarily increased the funds available for the flood insurance program. That is absolutely correct but Kevin didn't get the memo. In fact the bill that passed was around before the Sandy bill got porked up and presented. I found it when I was looking for the sandy bill. I didn't read the 112th version that closely but I assume they just changed the dates and reintroduced it in the 113. It gave everyone cover because they could say it was a sandy bill and it was very clean. So clean, Kevin is still saying there must be something else. The only people who voted no were the hard core "no new spending" people. aka...the modern day John Birchers.  |
|
#55
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article ,
says... On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:06:37 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:11:01 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , Once again, I'll ask. Are you really trying to tell people this is the whole bill? Yes and I am doing it without the 3d grade insults you can't seem to avoid when you are wrong. The reality is that no "Sandy Relief Bill" passed. The Bill that passed simply temporarily increased the funds available for the flood insurance program. That is absolutely correct but Kevin didn't get the memo. In fact the bill that passed was around before the Sandy bill got porked up and presented. I found it when I was looking for the sandy bill. I didn't read the 112th version that closely but I assume they just changed the dates and reintroduced it in the 113. It gave everyone cover because they could say it was a sandy bill and it was very clean. So clean, Kevin is still saying there must be something else. The only people who voted no were the hard core "no new spending" people. Oh, YOU presented the bill as Sandy relief!!! Nice try, but... busted. |
|
#56
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
|
#57
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
In article ,
says... On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:38:39 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:06:37 -0500, ESAD wrote: On 1/7/13 3:55 PM, wrote: On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:11:01 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , Once again, I'll ask. Are you really trying to tell people this is the whole bill? Yes and I am doing it without the 3d grade insults you can't seem to avoid when you are wrong. The reality is that no "Sandy Relief Bill" passed. The Bill that passed simply temporarily increased the funds available for the flood insurance program. That is absolutely correct but Kevin didn't get the memo. In fact the bill that passed was around before the Sandy bill got porked up and presented. I found it when I was looking for the sandy bill. I didn't read the 112th version that closely but I assume they just changed the dates and reintroduced it in the 113. It gave everyone cover because they could say it was a sandy bill and it was very clean. So clean, Kevin is still saying there must be something else. The only people who voted no were the hard core "no new spending" people. Oh, YOU presented the bill as Sandy relief!!! Nice try, but... busted. I didn't say H.R.41 was sandy relief, you did and you said it had the same pork as H.R.1 denying that a simple borrow and spend bill could be so simple. No I didn't. I never, ever said HR 41 was sandy relief, and I never said that is had "the same pork". I said it had pork. But now, somehow that's okay, but before, when Boehner wouldn't let a vote on it, it wasn't okay. In other words, it's just an excuse for Boehner's idiocy. |
|
#58
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/8/2013 10:39 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:39:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:24:51 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:11:01 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , Once again, I'll ask. Are you really trying to tell people this is the whole bill? Yes and I am doing it without the 3d grade insults you can't seem to avoid when you are wrong. Well, 1, it's not the whole bill, by far. 2, it's not a bill for Sandy relief. So.... nice try. Well 1 it IS the whole bill and 2 it is what they are calling the sandy bill. It will fund the flood relief, emergency housing and other FEMA functions. WHO is calling it the Sandy bill? Cite please. MSNBC http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/01/04/sandy-aid-bill-passes/ CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/04/politics/house-sandy-bill-vote/index.html Huff Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/hurricane-sandy-aid_n_2409538.html Fox http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/05/congress-passes-7-billion-sandy-bill/ Is that enough or should I go through the rest of the media sites. LOL... |
|
#59
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
On 1/8/13 11:34 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 11:00:10 -0500, JustWait wrote: On 1/8/2013 10:39 AM, wrote: On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:39:00 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 16:24:51 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 15:11:01 -0500, iBoaterer wrote: In article , Once again, I'll ask. Are you really trying to tell people this is the whole bill? Yes and I am doing it without the 3d grade insults you can't seem to avoid when you are wrong. Well, 1, it's not the whole bill, by far. 2, it's not a bill for Sandy relief. So.... nice try. Well 1 it IS the whole bill and 2 it is what they are calling the sandy bill. It will fund the flood relief, emergency housing and other FEMA functions. WHO is calling it the Sandy bill? Cite please. MSNBC http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/01/04/sandy-aid-bill-passes/ CNN http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/04/politics/house-sandy-bill-vote/index.html Huff Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/04/hurricane-sandy-aid_n_2409538.html Fox http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/05/congress-passes-7-billion-sandy-bill/ Is that enough or should I go through the rest of the media sites. LOL... Who would you think would say it? Reid and Boehner called it Sandy relief too. It will be interesting to see what sort of bill for actual Sandy relief is proposed and passed. If the Repugnicants don't allow it, it will be even more interesting to see what happens the next time there is a major natural disaster in their congressional districts. Something horrific in Texas, Alabama, Arizona (earthquakes and locusts?) and the Dakotas... |
|
#60
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey, Scotty, what do you think about THIS:
|
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hey, Scotty | General | |||
| Hey, Scotty! | General | |||
| hey Scotty | ASA | |||
| Hey Scotty... | ASA | |||
| Hey, Scotty!!! | ASA | |||
![Salmonbait[_2_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
