ESAD wrote:
On 1/13/13 10:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

True North wrote:
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote:
wrote:

On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...



Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html






What is YOUR solution?

Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and
legitimate hunting rifles.

My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt AR15. My

Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace.

You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the hands
of a
balanced stable person.

Big guns = Small dick.

Tell us about your guns again.....


Sure. Nowadays, I have a 9 mm pistol, a .22LR pistol, a .22LR rifle,
and, since I sold two shotguns, just one remaining 12 gauge. Also
sold, at a good profit, a pair of matched "cowboy" revolvers. None
could be considered "big" guns.

Here's the rifle, with its five-round mag:

http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv


The scope is in on backwards, moron. What is the criteria for a big or
small gun? Shotguns carry the biggest payload. The criteria for debt
payment is you either pay your taxes or you are a tax cheat. Simple!

ESAD wrote:
On 1/13/13 11:47 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 1/13/2013 10:59 AM, ESAD wrote:
On 1/13/13 10:53 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

True North wrote:
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:45:45 PM UTC-4, Earl wrote:
wrote:

On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article
,



says...



Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down
there...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html







What is YOUR solution?

Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and
legitimate hunting rifles.

My hunting rifle carries a much larger payload than my Colt
AR15. My

Benneli M4 shotgun could be even more of a menace.

You're the menace...those firearms would be just fine in the
hands of a
balanced stable person.

Big guns = Small dick.

Tell us about your guns again.....


Sure. Nowadays, I have a 9 mm pistol, a .22LR pistol, a .22LR rifle,
and, since I sold two shotguns, just one remaining 12 gauge. Also
sold,
at a good profit, a pair of matched "cowboy" revolvers. None could be
considered "big" guns.

Here's the rifle, with its five-round mag:

http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv



That's cool. Did you Know the scope is mounted backwards?

Just like his small dick!!


The scope is mounted properly. The mounting and sighting in was done
by a first-class gunsmith. Meyer/Earl probably sucks on the barrel
when he pulls the trigger.
He should be fired. You must have screwed him out of money like you did
the American people.

True North wrote:
*I* don't have to own guns to make up for my lack of dick. YOU do.




So, how else do you deal with the problem?

Enquiring minds want to know.

BTW...please don't say you 'have the problem in hand'.
BTW - Trim your posts - as stupid as they are. Can your RIM do that?

On 1/15/2013 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


Makes sense if you look at what the tool is meant to do.. I think he was
trying to second guess harry to get him to admit it's not his weapon
But google didn't let krause down this time

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.

"ESAD" wrote in message
...

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.


-------------

You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib?

"Califbill" wrote:
"ESAD" wrote in message ...

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.


-------------

You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib?

Come on by and you can sniff the barrel.

wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.
Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.
The magnification adjustments are on the down-range end of the scope. I
could be wrong but I have several different brands and none are set up
that way.

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"ESAD" wrote in message
...

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.


-------------

You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib?

Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!