On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"ESAD" wrote in message
...

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.


-------------

You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib?

Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!



Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got
it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at
it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it.

Here's another photo of the rifle:

http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:08:54 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"ESAD" wrote in message
...

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.


-------------

You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib?

Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!



Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got
it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at
it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it.

Here's another photo of the rifle:

http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv

Here's another:
http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/n3WDmue9OuY/default.jpg

and another:
http://tinyurl.com/ar8xle3

and yet another:
http://tinyurl.com/9wzstdz

and a whole bunch mo
http://tinyurl.com/bzfg67a

More names, ESAD?


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

On 1/17/13 11:30 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:08:54 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"ESAD" wrote in message
...

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.


-------------

You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib?

Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!



Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got
it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at
it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it.

Here's another photo of the rifle:

http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv

Here's another:
http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/n3WDmue9OuY/default.jpg

and another:
http://tinyurl.com/ar8xle3

and yet another:
http://tinyurl.com/9wzstdz

and a whole bunch mo
http://tinyurl.com/bzfg67a

More names, ESAD?


Salmonbait

--


Here you go, asshole:

http://tinyurl.com/by87gv9

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:08:54 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/17/13 10:55 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 15:49:20 -0800, "Califbill" wrote:

"ESAD" wrote in message
...

On 1/16/13 11:32 AM, wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:40:15 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/15/13 9:19 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:52:32 -0500, Earl wrote:

The scope is in on backwards, moron.

Ther big end (objective lens) in on the down range side on all of my
scoped rifles.


My guess is that "Earl," if he ever had his hands on a scoped rifle,
pointed it towards himself when he fired. It would explain his obvious
brain damage.

The rifle, btw, is a Thompson Center R-55. Mine has a stainless barrel
and receiver. There are a number R-55 models, including a couple with
wood stock.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2Vc8EbgSS0

I am not that familiar with TC rifles. I do have a few .22s and I just
sold my .22 machine gun (for a 700% profit)


It's a nicely made rifle, and pretty accurate right out of the box. I
was going to get one of the ubiquitous Ruger .22s, but everyone I know
who has one said it would "need work" to get as accurate as we'd want. I
also looked at a CZ .22, which was also nice. But my local gun shop
handles TC's, and gave me a good deal on the rifle and scope, mounted
the scope properly, and sighted it in for me. I also buy my fishing
bottom rigs and lures there, or at least I did when I spent more time
fishing.


-------------

You were posting that rifle as your own. Another fib?

Notice we've not heard of this rifle until someone else posted a reference to it.


Salmonbait

--

'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!



Wrong again, **** for brains. I posted photos of this rifle when I got
it a few years ago. If you want to drive out here, I'll let you look at
it. But not touch it. With your infirmities, you'd probably drop it.

Here's another photo of the rifle:

http://tinyurl.com/dy7yuwv

Here's another:
http://i3.ytimg.com/vi/n3WDmue9OuY/default.jpg

and another:
http://tinyurl.com/ar8xle3

and yet another:
http://tinyurl.com/9wzstdz

and a whole bunch mo
http://tinyurl.com/bzfg67a

More names, ESAD?

That's all you have, eh?