On Dec 15, 6:31*am, jps wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:35:17 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 3:47*am, jps wrote:

He had his mother's guns. *He had mental problems.

I wonder whose knives did *this guy borrowed?

http://www.courant.com/sns-rt-us-chi...065-20121213,0,...

22 injured vs 27 dead. *Knife vs. guns.

I know you're for real but I can't believe you're really that dense.

Maybe you can't read between the lines, but if the knife wielder
wanted those kids dead. They would be.

On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 04:41:10 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 6:31*am, jps wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:35:17 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 3:47*am, jps wrote:

He had his mother's guns. *He had mental problems.

I wonder whose knives did *this guy borrowed?

http://www.courant.com/sns-rt-us-chi...065-20121213,0,...

22 injured vs 27 dead. *Knife vs. guns.

I know you're for real but I can't believe you're really that dense.

Maybe you can't read between the lines, but if the knife wielder
wanted those kids dead. They would be.

And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

We are a nation of desperate people, with no national mental health
system (thanks to Reagan) a diminishing income vs. expense rate and a
society that promotes violence as a justifiable means to resolving
conflicts.

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 04:41:10 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 6:31 am, jps wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:35:17 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 3:47 am, jps wrote:

He had his mother's guns. He had mental problems.

I wonder whose knives did this guy borrowed?

http://www.courant.com/sns-rt-us-chi...065-20121213,0,...

22 injured vs 27 dead. Knife vs. guns.

I know you're for real but I can't believe you're really that dense.

Maybe you can't read between the lines, but if the knife wielder
wanted those kids dead. They would be.

And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

We are a nation of desperate people, with no national mental health
system (thanks to Reagan) a diminishing income vs. expense rate and a
society that promotes violence as a justifiable means to resolving
conflicts.

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

-----------------------------------


Regan did not shut down the mental health system. He went along with a very
liberal Legislature who wanted community health centers. So he went along
with the legislature. Not worth fighting. The Regional Centers were
actually funded under Regan. Since about Grey Davis, they have been cut
tremendously.

On 12/15/12 5:20 PM, Califbill wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 04:41:10 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 6:31 am, jps wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:35:17 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 3:47 am, jps wrote:

He had his mother's guns. He had mental problems.

I wonder whose knives did this guy borrowed?

http://www.courant.com/sns-rt-us-chi...065-20121213,0,...


22 injured vs 27 dead. Knife vs. guns.

I know you're for real but I can't believe you're really that dense.

Maybe you can't read between the lines, but if the knife wielder
wanted those kids dead. They would be.

And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

We are a nation of desperate people, with no national mental health
system (thanks to Reagan) a diminishing income vs. expense rate and a
society that promotes violence as a justifiable means to resolving
conflicts.

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

-----------------------------------


Regan did not shut down the mental health system. He went along with a
very liberal Legislature who wanted community health centers. So he
went along with the legislature. Not worth fighting. The Regional
Centers were actually funded under Regan. Since about Grey Davis, they
have been cut tremendously.



Did you happen to see the word "national" in the previous post, Bilious?

On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:


And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

Not much. Nothing is a 'weapon' until it's turned into one, regardless
of if it's a gun, knife, claw hammer, axe, box opener...

We are a nation of desperate people,

And why is that?

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

No. I obtained mine legally and maintain and use them in accordance
with State and Federal laws. If that's not suitable for you then by
all means get out of the dump and run for high office. Then do what
you can to change the law.

On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:39:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:


And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

Not much. Nothing is a 'weapon' until it's turned into one, regardless
of if it's a gun, knife, claw hammer, axe, box opener...

We are a nation of desperate people,

And why is that?

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

No. I obtained mine legally and maintain and use them in accordance
with State and Federal laws. If that's not suitable for you then by
all means get out of the dump and run for high office. Then do what
you can to change the law.

Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were obtained
legally.

On Dec 16, 10:52*pm, jps wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:39:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:









On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:

And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

Not much. Nothing is a 'weapon' until it's turned into one, regardless
of if it's a gun, knife, claw hammer, axe, box opener...

We are a nation of desperate people,

And why is that?

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

No. I obtained mine legally and maintain and use them in accordance
with *State and Federal laws. If that's not suitable for you then by
all means get out of the dump and run for high office. Then *do what
you can to change the law.

Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were obtained
legally.

Ok, but that isn't relivant to your question.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:39:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:


And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

Not much. Nothing is a 'weapon' until it's turned into one, regardless
of if it's a gun, knife, claw hammer, axe, box opener...

We are a nation of desperate people,

And why is that?

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

No. I obtained mine legally and maintain and use them in accordance
with State and Federal laws. If that's not suitable for you then by
all means get out of the dump and run for high office. Then do what
you can to change the law.

Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were obtained
legally.

That's the problem, someone obtains them legally, then someone either
"borrows" them or steals them to commit crimes and kill innocent people
and children.

On Dec 17, 7:47*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...











On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:39:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:

And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

Not much. Nothing is a 'weapon' until it's turned into one, regardless
of if it's a gun, knife, claw hammer, axe, box opener...

We are a nation of desperate people,

And why is that?

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

No. I obtained mine legally and maintain and use them in accordance
with *State and Federal laws. If that's not suitable for you then by
all means get out of the dump and run for high office. Then *do what
you can to change the law.

Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were obtained
legally.

That's the problem, someone obtains them legally, then someone either
"borrows" them or steals them to commit crimes and kill innocent people
and children.

Yep!

"Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were
obtained legally."

Then used by criminal[s] in a highly illegal manner.

In article 12bab11d-0b2f-4ec4-8c66-ce09a82eb10d@
10g2000yqo.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 17, 7:47*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...











On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 21:39:01 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Dec 15, 1:26*pm, jps wrote:

And just what does that tell you about the difference between our two
societies and American's ability to handle weapons responsibly?

Not much. Nothing is a 'weapon' until it's turned into one, regardless
of if it's a gun, knife, claw hammer, axe, box opener...

We are a nation of desperate people,

And why is that?

Think making guns real available is a good idea?

No. I obtained mine legally and maintain and use them in accordance
with *State and Federal laws. If that's not suitable for you then by
all means get out of the dump and run for high office. Then *do what
you can to change the law.

Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were obtained
legally.

That's the problem, someone obtains them legally, then someone either
"borrows" them or steals them to commit crimes and kill innocent people
and children.

Yep!

"Every one of the weapons used in high casualty incidents were
obtained legally."

Then used by criminal[s] in a highly illegal manner.

Something like 43,000 gun incidences involved guns that were, at one
time, obtained legally.