In article , says...

On 9/4/2012 2:06 PM, GuzzisRule wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35
@v9g2000pbu.googlegroups.com, says...

On Sep 3, 8:00 am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...











On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all...

What fraud? Please be specific.

The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and
Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on
fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for
medicare/medicaid fraud.

The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant
investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide
and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in
the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of
the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really
were.
We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for
their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had
no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury
duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera,
admitting it.

Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster
doesn't have any intention of learning any facts..

So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr.
Insanity.

http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/

There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just
make it up as you go along...

Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse
me..

Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded

Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card.
One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting.

And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that
the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how?

Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal
law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are
the ones opposing the requirement.

Didn't you know that?

Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement?


Because with a fair vote, they would get slaughtered...

The GOP leaders who implemented these laws keep admitting they
intentionally did it within a few months of the election it effects to
disenfranchise Democrat leaning groups (like minorities).

If you want voter ID laws, at least do them right - start issuing them
for free 8 years before you start requiring them in elections, and in
all votings between the required one have the poll staff inform about
these IDs and hand out the paperwork to be filed. Run some TV ads so
everyone knows they're free, and do everything you can to make it easier

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 14:27:12 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35
, says...

On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...











On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all...

What fraud? Please be specific.

The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and
Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on
fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for
medicare/medicaid fraud.

The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant
investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide
and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in
the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of
the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really
were.
We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for
their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had
no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury
duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera,
admitting it.

Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster
doesn't have any intention of learning any facts..

So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr.
Insanity.

http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/

There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just
make it up as you go along...

Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse
me..

Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded

Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card.
One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting.

And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that
the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how?

Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal
law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are
the ones opposing the requirement.

Didn't you know that?

Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement?

I'm not Kevin, you old washed up senile coot. BUT, if you must ask
(stupidity, or head in the sand?) The GOP leaders who implemented these
laws keep admitting they intentionally did it within a few months of the
election it effects to disenfranchise Democrat leaning groups (like
minorities).

If you want voter ID laws, at least do them right - start issuing them
for free 8 years before you start requiring them in elections, and in
all votings between the required one have the poll staff inform about
these IDs and hand out the paperwork to be filed. Run some TV ads so
everyone knows they're free, and do everything you can to make it
easier.


Kevin, you totally miss the point. A vast majority of these 'minorities' already have ID's. They
used them for the things already mentioned. Now they should be required to show them. You're acting
as though an ID would be something totally new to these folks. How the hell did they get their food
stamps in the first place? Or their driver's license, or proof of age for beer and tattoos? Or,
since their all well educated, their library cards? And, if they're not well educated, then blame it
on the liberals resistance to the No Child Left Behind act.

On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:06:00 -0400, GuzzisRule wrote:


Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply
'explaining' the existing liberal law. The topic had to do with voter ID
- the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are the ones
opposing the requirement.

Didn't you know that?

Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement?

Maybe they have a longer memory the Republicans. They can remember all
the poll taxes, and other drivel, that kept minorities from voting. They
can remember, because they, the Southern Democrats, were the ones doing
it.

On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:12:42 -0400, JustWait wrote:

Because with a fair vote, they would get slaughtered...

Fair vote, hell, until the Republicans become something more that "white
bread" they are relegated to being a regional party. It takes more than
a few black faces, a couple of women, an a few Hispanic names, to win
national elections.

On 9/4/2012 5:02 PM, thunder wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:12:42 -0400, JustWait wrote:

Because with a fair vote, they would get slaughtered...

Fair vote, hell, until the Republicans become something more that "white
bread" they are relegated to being a regional party. It takes more than
a few black faces, a couple of women, an a few Hispanic names, to win
national elections.


Yeah, by what, a few thousand votes... Less than the amount of illegal
votes cast all together...