In article ,
says...

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 12:57:26 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:02:45 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article 7809e3a5-06c9-49f0-a4f5-110ac04d6a35
, says...

On Sep 3, 8:00*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...











On 9/2/2012 1:32 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:16:33 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

If we could stop the fraud, we wouldn't need any help at all...

What fraud? Please be specific.

The fraud made up by the Republican governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and
Florida. One has to admit, though, that Rick Scott is an expert on
fraud, since his company was fined a half billion bucks for
medicare/medicaid fraud.

The simple fact is that there has not really been a significant
investigation of potential voter fraud. Nobody disputes a landslide
and that is the case in most of our gerrymandered districts. Even in
the 2000 election where they parsed hanging chads and the intent of
the voter, there was never any investigation of who the voters really
were.
We have no idea about how many widows send in absentee ballots for
their dead husband and how many aliens vote. Our local TV station had
no problem finding hundreds of people who voted and then refused jury
duty because they were not citizens. They even got a few on camera,
admitting it.

Asking us to "cite" voter fraud should be enough proof the poster
doesn't have any intention of learning any facts..

So, you can't actually come up with any "voter fraud".... Got it, Mr.
Insanity.

http://specfriggintacular.wordpress....f-voter-fraud/

There you go Noble. My last post to you proving yet again, you just
make it up as you go along...

Noble now? ****, I thought I was Kevin.... You insane people confuse
me..

Here, Kevin. This is what is meant by acceptable, to liberals, voter fraud.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v...layer_embedded

Remember, it takes an ID to drive, buy beer, get a tattoo, get food stamps, and get a library card.
One must wonder why liberals are so anti-ID when it comes to voting.

And you know that those officials were liberal how? And you know that
the persons asking to vote third party wanted to vote democratic how?

Kevin, no one said anything about the officials. They were simply 'explaining' the existing liberal
law. The topic had to do with voter ID - the lack of which simply allows voter fraud. Democrats are
the ones opposing the requirement.

Didn't you know that?

Why are Democrats so opposed to a voter ID requirement?

I'm not Kevin, you old washed up senile coot. BUT, if you must ask
(stupidity, or head in the sand?) The GOP leaders who implemented these
laws keep admitting they intentionally did it within a few months of the
election it effects to disenfranchise Democrat leaning groups (like
minorities).

If you want voter ID laws, at least do them right - start issuing them
for free 8 years before you start requiring them in elections, and in
all votings between the required one have the poll staff inform about
these IDs and hand out the paperwork to be filed. Run some TV ads so
everyone knows they're free, and do everything you can to make it
easier.