About Us

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article , says...

On 8/10/2012 10:12 PM, Earl wrote:
X ` Man wrote:
On 8/10/12 12:09 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that
way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!

What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?

Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.

No fair, you're not jps!

I really would like to see his solution.

Simple. Since all the domestic terrorists who engage in mass gun
murders seem to be righties, round all the gun-owning righties up,
put them and their firearms into a huge fenced area in Arizona or
Texas, drop in huge amounts of ammo, whiskey, crank, bibles and
condoms (but no food or water) and come back in a month to see which
one is still alive. Shoot him. If any of those righties held decent
jobs, give those jobs to the jobless and to hard-working Mexicans.

Un-****ing-believable! You are insane, Harry.

The more we ignore him, the more insane he will get...

Who is "we"?

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article , says...

On 8/10/2012 10:01 PM, Earl wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Aug 9 (Reuters) - The Tucson gunman who killed six people and severely
wounded Gabrielle Giffords has labeled himself a failure because the
former Arizona Congresswoman survived his rampage, according to a
prison psychologist's report released on Thursday.

The report's release comes two days after Jared Loughner, 23, in a
deal that will spare him the death penalty, pleaded guilty to six
murders and other charges stemming from his January 2011 shooting
spree at a Tucson supermarket.

Psychologist Christina Pietz, who evaluated Loughner at a federal
prison hospital in Missouri, said in the report that Loughner had
repeatedly made comments suggesting he thought Giffords died when he
shot her in the head.

At one time, he suggested he understood that Giffords was alive,
according to Pietz, who wrote that she pressed him on that point, and
he admitted to feeling disappointed in her survival because it meant
he "failed."

"I'm not an assassin," Pietz's report quoted Loughner, a community
college dropout, as saying.

Later on in the interview, he told Pietz: "Jared Loughner failed
again. He's a failure. So all of this would be for nothing."

Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!
What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?
Illicit drugs are banned. How's that working? The same scumbags are
using both!

Has JPS given his solution yet? Has he explained why so many of these
shootings are left wingers in blue states??? Oh, and why when some arab
**** goes around shooting soldiers screaming about his God, it's not
terrorism, but some white fool goes nuts and it's terrorism right out of
the blocks??? I am so sick of the racism my government is pushing on us.
I NEVER OWNED A SLAVE!!!!! Period...

Just what racism is your government pushing on you? Please be specific.

Meyer[_2_]

On 8/11/2012 9:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote:

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

What do you think the university should have done after the shooter
dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very
little in the way of decent public mental health services.

That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of
the workings of a human mind.

Or they got their degree from a third rate diploma mill in DC!

Are you talking about the protestant lady who is supposedly married to
an agnostic and got her doctorate from a Catholic college.

John H[_2_]

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help
solve the problem?

Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about
guns.

Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks?

Meyer[_2_]

On 8/11/2012 9:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help
solve the problem?

Which problem. There's a lot of problems that need solving. Be specific.

Meyer[_2_]

On 8/11/2012 9:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:21:08 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter.

Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a
better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the
vast majority of guns are designed to kill.

So what's your solution, jps?

Does whining about it in a boating group help resolve the problem?

Does your constantly asking the same question in a boating newsgroup
help resolve the problem?

Pot kettle black

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help
solve the problem?

Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about
guns.

Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks?

****ing bigoted *******....

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article m,
says...

On 8/11/2012 9:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help
solve the problem?

Which problem. There's a lot of problems that need solving. Be specific.

I'm just as specific as that asshole Herring.

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article m,
says...

On 8/11/2012 9:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote:

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

What do you think the university should have done after the shooter
dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very
little in the way of decent public mental health services.

That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of
the workings of a human mind.

Or they got their degree from a third rate diploma mill in DC!

Are you talking about the protestant lady who is supposedly married to
an agnostic and got her doctorate from a Catholic college.

If the shoe fits the swollen foot.....!

X ` Man

On 8/11/12 9:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help
solve the problem?

Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about
guns.

Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks?

****ing bigoted *******....

iLoogy, have you ever in your entire semi-adult life gotten through a
day without attempting to insult *everyone* you encounter? It seems to
be your reason for existence.

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Uh, yeah.........., right.........., whatever	Frogwatch[_2_]	General	1	March 22nd 11 10:52 PM
Oh Yeah!	John[_6_]	General	1	December 12th 08 02:05 PM
OT Oh yeah, That	[email protected]	General	0	September 29th 05 03:28 PM
Yeah, it's me!	JimH	General	2	May 19th 05 08:02 PM

Menu

About Us