About Us

Meyer[_2_]

On 8/11/2012 6:11 AM, John H wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:30:03 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ?

Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates
the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his
low self esteem.

That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man.

I don't bitch and whine about my golf game as you do about guns.

Again, what would your solution be?

You and Krause are quick to make a personal attack, but can't answer a simple question.

Neither can think independently and can only respond as directed.

X ` Man

On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote:

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

What do you think the university should have done after the shooter
dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very
little in the way of decent public mental health services.

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

BAR[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:07:31 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Half the time, those doing the evaluations are nuttier than the patients.

Or got their degree from some third rate diploma mill.......

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

It wasn't the university's problem anymore when the shooter dropped out.

BAR[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter.

Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a
better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the
vast majority of guns are designed to kill.

Target practice is a good thing, you learn to hit what you intended to
hit rather than spraying bullets all over the place.

Meyer[_2_]

On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote:

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

What do you think the university should have done after the shooter
dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very
little in the way of decent public mental health services.

That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of
the workings of a human mind.

BAR[_2_]

In article om,
says...

On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote:

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

What do you think the university should have done after the shooter
dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very
little in the way of decent public mental health services.

That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of
the workings of a human mind.

The DSM is just a method for ensuring that the conditions in vogue are
considered to be diseases and therefore, fall under in-plan.

"By design, the DSM is primarily concerned with the signs and symptoms
of mental disorders, rather than the underlying causes. It claims to
collect them together based on statistical or clinical patterns. As
such, it has been compared to a naturalist?s field guide to birds, with
similar advantages and disadvantages."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnos...nual_of_Mental
_Disorders#Superficial_symptoms

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article om,
says...

On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote:

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

What do you think the university should have done after the shooter
dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very
little in the way of decent public mental health services.

That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of
the workings of a human mind.

Or they got their degree from a third rate diploma mill in DC!

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help
solve the problem?

Meyer[_2_]

On 8/11/2012 8:58 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote:

In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as
being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their
concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the
university.

What do you think the university should have done after the shooter
dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very
little in the way of decent public mental health services.

That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of
the workings of a human mind.

The DSM is just a method for ensuring that the conditions in vogue are
considered to be diseases and therefore, fall under in-plan.

"By design, the DSM is primarily concerned with the signs and symptoms
of mental disorders, rather than the underlying causes. It claims to
collect them together based on statistical or clinical patterns. As
such, it has been compared to a naturalist?s field guide to birds, with
similar advantages and disadvantages."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnos...nual_of_Mental
_Disorders#Superficial_symptoms

I see. They finally wrote a book about Krause.

iBoaterer[_2_]

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:21:08 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:

Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter.

Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a
better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the
vast majority of guns are designed to kill.

So what's your solution, jps?

Does whining about it in a boating group help resolve the problem?

Does your constantly asking the same question in a boating newsgroup
help resolve the problem?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Uh, yeah.........., right.........., whatever	Frogwatch[_2_]	General	1	March 22nd 11 10:52 PM
Oh Yeah!	John[_6_]	General	1	December 12th 08 02:05 PM
OT Oh yeah, That	[email protected]	General	0	September 29th 05 03:28 PM
Yeah, it's me!	JimH	General	2	May 19th 05 08:02 PM

Menu

About Us