|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
|
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 9:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Which problem. There's a lot of problems that need solving. Be specific. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/2012 9:24 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:21:08 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl wrote: jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter. Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the vast majority of guns are designed to kill. So what's your solution, jps? Does whining about it in a boating group help resolve the problem? Does your constantly asking the same question in a boating newsgroup help resolve the problem? Pot kettle black |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article ,
says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article m,
says... On 8/11/2012 9:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Which problem. There's a lot of problems that need solving. Be specific. I'm just as specific as that asshole Herring. |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
In article m,
says... On 8/11/2012 9:21 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 8/11/2012 7:54 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 8/11/12 1:50 AM, wrote: In the case of the Aurora shooter the university had pinpointed him as being a potential threat but when he dropped out, they dropped their concern. Maybe instead of suing the movie theater, they should sue the university. What do you think the university should have done after the shooter dropped out in his mental health issues? This is a country with very little in the way of decent public mental health services. That's because the practitioners are mostly quacks who know little of the workings of a human mind. Or they got their degree from a third rate diploma mill in DC! Are you talking about the protestant lady who is supposedly married to an agnostic and got her doctorate from a Catholic college. If the shoe fits the swollen foot.....! |
Oh yeah, we need more of this...
On 8/11/12 9:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 09:22:32 -0400, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote: On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote: On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote: Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist did in Wisconsin. Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it. And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying. Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could be used as a weapon on a high shelf. This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with. That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon. Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes. Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point? Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else. So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Does your continuous self righteousness in a boating newsgroup help solve the problem? Kevin, there is nothing wrong with being righteous. I'm not the one whining and complaining about guns. Can a liberal answer a simple question, or must they always resort to personal attacks? ****ing bigoted *******.... iLoogy, have you ever in your entire semi-adult life gotten through a day without attempting to insult *everyone* you encounter? It seems to be your reason for existence. -- I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com