Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On 8/10/2012 10:01 PM, Earl wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Aug 9 (Reuters) - The Tucson gunman who killed six people and severely
wounded Gabrielle Giffords has labeled himself a failure because the
former Arizona Congresswoman survived his rampage, according to a
prison psychologist's report released on Thursday.

The report's release comes two days after Jared Loughner, 23, in a
deal that will spare him the death penalty, pleaded guilty to six
murders and other charges stemming from his January 2011 shooting
spree at a Tucson supermarket.

Psychologist Christina Pietz, who evaluated Loughner at a federal
prison hospital in Missouri, said in the report that Loughner had
repeatedly made comments suggesting he thought Giffords died when he
shot her in the head.

At one time, he suggested he understood that Giffords was alive,
according to Pietz, who wrote that she pressed him on that point, and
he admitted to feeling disappointed in her survival because it meant
he "failed."

"I'm not an assassin," Pietz's report quoted Loughner, a community
college dropout, as saying.

Later on in the interview, he told Pietz: "Jared Loughner failed
again. He's a failure. So all of this would be for nothing."



Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!
What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?
Illicit drugs are banned. How's that working? The same scumbags are
using both!

Has JPS given his solution yet? Has he explained why so many of these
shootings are left wingers in blue states??? Oh, and why when some arab
**** goes around shooting soldiers screaming about his God, it's not
terrorism, but some white fool goes nuts and it's terrorism right out of
the blocks??? I am so sick of the racism my government is pushing on us.
I NEVER OWNED A SLAVE!!!!! Period...

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:


Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter.

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:


Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.
So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ?

Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates
the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his
low self esteem.

That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man.
You lefties are over the top!

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On 8/10/12 10:39 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 8/10/2012 10:12 PM, Earl wrote:
X ` Man wrote:
On 8/10/12 12:09 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote:

On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:

Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that
way we
can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the
criminally insane. Ammo too!

What's your solution, jps?

Should this country ban all guns?

Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.

No fair, you're not jps!

I really would like to see his solution.



Simple. Since all the domestic terrorists who engage in mass gun
murders seem to be righties, round all the gun-owning righties up,
put them and their firearms into a huge fenced area in Arizona or
Texas, drop in huge amounts of ammo, whiskey, crank, bibles and
condoms (but no food or water) and come back in a month to see which
one is still alive. Shoot him. If any of those righties held decent
jobs, give those jobs to the jobless and to hard-working Mexicans.

Un-****ing-believable! You are insane, Harry.

The more we ignore him, the more insane he will get...



Do the voices in your head sing in harmony?

--
I'm a liberal because the militant fundamentalist ignorant
science-denying religious xenophobic corporate oligarchy of modern
Republican conservatism just doesn't work for me or my country.

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On Friday, August 10, 2012 9:42:41 PM UTC-5, JustWait wrote:
On 8/10/2012 10:01 PM, Earl wrote:

John H. wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:



Aug 9 (Reuters) - The Tucson gunman who killed six people and severely

wounded Gabrielle Giffords has labeled himself a failure because the

former Arizona Congresswoman survived his rampage, according to a

prison psychologist's report released on Thursday.



The report's release comes two days after Jared Loughner, 23, in a

deal that will spare him the death penalty, pleaded guilty to six

murders and other charges stemming from his January 2011 shooting

spree at a Tucson supermarket.



Psychologist Christina Pietz, who evaluated Loughner at a federal

prison hospital in Missouri, said in the report that Loughner had

repeatedly made comments suggesting he thought Giffords died when he

shot her in the head.



At one time, he suggested he understood that Giffords was alive,

according to Pietz, who wrote that she pressed him on that point, and

he admitted to feeling disappointed in her survival because it meant

he "failed."



"I'm not an assassin," Pietz's report quoted Loughner, a community

college dropout, as saying.



Later on in the interview, he told Pietz: "Jared Loughner failed

again. He's a failure. So all of this would be for nothing."







Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we

can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the

criminally insane. Ammo too!

What's your solution, jps?



Should this country ban all guns?

Illicit drugs are banned. How's that working? The same scumbags are

using both!



Has JPS given his solution yet?


Never.

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:51:50 -0400, Earl
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:


Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.
So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?

Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ?

Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates
the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his
low self esteem.

That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man.

You lefties are over the top!

Earl, don't get down on yourself for this, but it requires a sense of
humor to keep up.

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:


Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter.

Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a
better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the
vast majority of guns are designed to kill.

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:30:03 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:17:31 -0400, X ` Man
wrote:

On 8/10/12 5:05 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:



Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.

Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.

Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.

Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?

Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

So what's your solution, jps? Does continuous bitching in a boating newsgroup help solve the
problem?


Does your continuous drooling in a boating newsgroup solve *anything* ?


Does Herring playing golf "solve anything?" Probably just frustrates
the **** out of him, confirms his lack of athleticism and furthers his
low self esteem.

That's the perfect opportunity to blame his failures on the black man.

I don't bitch and whine about my golf game as you do about guns.

Again, what would your solution be?

You and Krause are quick to make a personal attack, but can't answer a simple question.

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 00:21:08 -0700, jps wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:50:52 -0400, Earl
wrote:

jps wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:24:58 -0400, wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:21:00 -0700, jps wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:57:51 -0400, wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:28:26 -0700, jps wrote:


Doesn't require a lot of ambition to buy a gun, some ammo in order to
affect retribution on a smaller scale, such as the white supremecist
did in Wisconsin.

Any jackass with a mastercard and a sick mind can do it.

And for whomever says a car can do just as much harm, I doubt it'd fit
real easily inside a Mosque where old men are praying.
Maybe we should be spending a little more time figuring out why people
do these things instead of simply trying to put everything that could
be used as a weapon on a high shelf.

This is similar to the way we are handling airline security. Instead
of targeting terrorists, we target the last weapon they came up with.
That does absolutely nothing to stop the next weapon.
Guns are designed to kill. Box cutters are designed to open boxes.
Ammonium Nitrate was designed to be fertilizer. What's your point?
Something that's sole purpose in design is killing vs. anything else.

Not true. I have many guns and I am a target shooter.

Target shooting came to pass as a means to practice, in order to be a
better shot. That it became sport doesn't alter the fact that the
vast majority of guns are designed to kill.

So what's your solution, jps?

Does whining about it in a boating group help resolve the problem?

Oh yeah, we need more of this...
 

On Friday, August 10, 2012 11:19:19 AM UTC-5, X ` Man wrote:
On 8/10/12 12:09 PM, John H. wrote:

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:08:46 -0400, Meyer wrote:



On 8/10/2012 8:38 AM, John H. wrote:

On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:45:10 -0700, jps wrote:



Let's make tools designed to kill people widely available, that way we

can be certain that they'll eventually fall into the hands of the

criminally insane. Ammo too!



What's your solution, jps?



Should this country ban all guns?



Laws and bans only affect law abiding citizens.



No fair, you're not jps!



I really would like to see his solution.







Simple. Since all the domestic terrorists who engage in mass gun murders

seem to be righties, round all the gun-owning righties up,

put them and their firearms into a huge fenced area in Arizona or Texas,

drop in huge amounts of ammo, whiskey, crank, bibles and condoms (but no

food or water) and come back in a month to see which one is still alive.

Shoot him. If any of those righties held decent jobs, give those jobs to

the jobless and to hard-working Mexicans.



--

I'm a liberal


Brilliant solution. Krauser. Seig Heil!