|
You don't have to be really...
On Jul 8, 7:22*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. *Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? |
You don't have to be really...
In article om, 5@
5.com says... On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. Harry is trying to justify his pedophilic tendencies again. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 9:37 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? Maybe this will help you understand Harry Krause, Iboaterer and those of sinilar mindset. http://www.aryan-nations.org/ |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 9:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. Harry is trying to justify his pedophilic tendencies again. He hasn't exactly hidden these feelings over the years, he is probably the nastiest human being I have ever encountered in my short lifetime... |
You don't have to be really...
In article m,
says... On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. I agree! |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/12 10:04 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/8/2012 9:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. Harry is trying to justify his pedophilic tendencies again. He hasn't exactly hidden these feelings over the years, he is probably the nastiest human being I have ever encountered in my short lifetime... You and BAR have something in common...almost no meaningful formal education and therefore no understanding of many of the polysyllabic words you misuse. Not being against older teens of approximately the same age enjoying safe sex with each other doesn't make one a fan of pedophilia. |
You don't have to be really...
In article , says...
On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? You are so whacked out it isn't even funny anymore. Who said a damned thing about being "poor"? Have you ever seen a newborn baby who is a crack addict at birth because the mother was one? I have. Have you ever seen a newborn writhing in pain because it's brain stem is exposed? I have. And your above bull**** about deciding who lives and who dies, etc. is just that. A ****ing FOX talking point. Here's what is truly "dangerous", republicans who don't think that because a human is female that they don't have the right to choose what THEY want to do. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com