BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   You don't have to be really... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/152325-you-dont-have-really.html)

X ` Man[_3_] July 2nd 12 06:14 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
....stupid to live in the south, but...it helps.


Federal judge halts Mississippi abortion law


TUPELO, Mississippi (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday temporarily
blocked Mississippi from enforcing a new law that requires doctors who
perform abortions at the state's sole abortion clinic to have admitting
privileges at a local hospital.

The state law, challenged last week by the Jackson Women's Health
Organization, has threatened to make Mississippi the only U.S. state
without an abortion clinic. It was set to take effect on Sunday.

U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Jordan entered a temporary restraining
order and set a hearing for July 11 to determine whether it should be
extended.

"In this case, plaintiffs have offered evidence — including quotes from
significant legislative and executive officers — that the act's purpose
is to eliminate abortions in Mississippi," Jordan found.

"They likewise submitted evidence that no safety or health concerns
motivated its passage. This evidence has not yet been rebutted."

The law signed by *Republican* Governor Phil Bryant in April requires
all doctors performing abortions at a Mississippi clinic to be certified
in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as to have admitting privileges at
a local hospital.

"The federal judge's decision is disappointing, and Governor Bryant
plans to work with state leaders to ensure this legislation properly
takes effect as soon as possible," spokesman Mick Bullock said.

The clinic challenged the new measure as unconstitutional for aiming to
effectively ban abortions in Mississippi, and also was seeking more time
to comply with the law.

Doctors at the Jackson health clinic already are certified in obstetrics
and gynecology, but have not been able to obtain privileges at any of
the half dozen hospitals within a 30-minute drive from the clinic,
despite trying since early May.

Republican state Representative Sam Mims, who sponsored the measure,
said the law aims to protect women.

POLITICAL STRATEGY?

Clinic owner Dianze Derzis called it a political strategy to ban
abortion in Mississippi without having to challenge Roe V. Wade. "It
isn't about anything but putting that clinic out of business," Derzis
told Reuters.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the clinic by the New
York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, cited several instances in
which state lawmakers publicly voiced hope the law would make
Mississippi abortion-free.

State health department inspectors had planned to check on the clinic's
compliance with the law Monday, but no inspection will take place, a
department spokeswoman said.

Attorneys for the state health department said in court papers the
clinic had ample time in the appeals process to explore options without
seeking a court injunction.

But clinic attorneys said the clinic and its doctors would be putting
themselves at risk by performing abortions outside the letter of the law
- despite the appeals process.

"Today's decision reaffirms the fundamental constitutional rights of
women in Mississippi and ensures the Jackson Women's Health Organization
can continue providing the critical reproductive health care that they
have offered to women for the last 17 years," said Nancy Northup,
president and chief executive at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Mims said he was disappointed by the injunction, "but the courts have
spoken, and we'll let the legal process begin."

Mississippi already has some of the country's strictest abortion laws
and one of the lowest abortion rates. It also has the highest teenage
pregnancy rate in the United States - more than 60 percent above the
national average in 2010.

The state became a battleground for reproductive rights last fall when
voters weighed in on a constitutional "personhood" amendment that
defined life as starting at the moment eggs are fertilized. Voters
rejected the proposed amendment.

Thirty-nine other states also require that OB-GYNs perform abortions,
and nine others mandate hospital privileges, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to sexual and reproductive
rights.

The Jackson Women's Health Organization has been providing services in
Mississippi since 1996. The nearest clinics outside the state are in
Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.

- - -

All part of the Republican war on women.

Oscar July 2nd 12 06:35 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/2012 1:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...stupid to live in the south, but...it helps.


Federal judge halts Mississippi abortion law


TUPELO, Mississippi (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday temporarily
blocked Mississippi from enforcing a new law that requires doctors who
perform abortions at the state's sole abortion clinic to have admitting
privileges at a local hospital.

The state law, challenged last week by the Jackson Women's Health
Organization, has threatened to make Mississippi the only U.S. state
without an abortion clinic. It was set to take effect on Sunday.

U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Jordan entered a temporary restraining
order and set a hearing for July 11 to determine whether it should be
extended.

"In this case, plaintiffs have offered evidence — including quotes from
significant legislative and executive officers — that the act's purpose
is to eliminate abortions in Mississippi," Jordan found.

"They likewise submitted evidence that no safety or health concerns
motivated its passage. This evidence has not yet been rebutted."

The law signed by *Republican* Governor Phil Bryant in April requires
all doctors performing abortions at a Mississippi clinic to be certified
in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as to have admitting privileges at
a local hospital.

"The federal judge's decision is disappointing, and Governor Bryant
plans to work with state leaders to ensure this legislation properly
takes effect as soon as possible," spokesman Mick Bullock said.

The clinic challenged the new measure as unconstitutional for aiming to
effectively ban abortions in Mississippi, and also was seeking more time
to comply with the law.

Doctors at the Jackson health clinic already are certified in obstetrics
and gynecology, but have not been able to obtain privileges at any of
the half dozen hospitals within a 30-minute drive from the clinic,
despite trying since early May.

Republican state Representative Sam Mims, who sponsored the measure,
said the law aims to protect women.

POLITICAL STRATEGY?

Clinic owner Dianze Derzis called it a political strategy to ban
abortion in Mississippi without having to challenge Roe V. Wade. "It
isn't about anything but putting that clinic out of business," Derzis
told Reuters.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the clinic by the New
York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, cited several instances in
which state lawmakers publicly voiced hope the law would make
Mississippi abortion-free.

State health department inspectors had planned to check on the clinic's
compliance with the law Monday, but no inspection will take place, a
department spokeswoman said.

Attorneys for the state health department said in court papers the
clinic had ample time in the appeals process to explore options without
seeking a court injunction.

But clinic attorneys said the clinic and its doctors would be putting
themselves at risk by performing abortions outside the letter of the law
- despite the appeals process.

"Today's decision reaffirms the fundamental constitutional rights of
women in Mississippi and ensures the Jackson Women's Health Organization
can continue providing the critical reproductive health care that they
have offered to women for the last 17 years," said Nancy Northup,
president and chief executive at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Mims said he was disappointed by the injunction, "but the courts have
spoken, and we'll let the legal process begin."

Mississippi already has some of the country's strictest abortion laws
and one of the lowest abortion rates. It also has the highest teenage
pregnancy rate in the United States - more than 60 percent above the
national average in 2010.

The state became a battleground for reproductive rights last fall when
voters weighed in on a constitutional "personhood" amendment that
defined life as starting at the moment eggs are fertilized. Voters
rejected the proposed amendment.

Thirty-nine other states also require that OB-GYNs perform abortions,
and nine others mandate hospital privileges, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to sexual and reproductive
rights.

The Jackson Women's Health Organization has been providing services in
Mississippi since 1996. The nearest clinics outside the state are in
Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.

- - -

All part of the Republican war on women.


Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


JustWait[_2_] July 2nd 12 07:43 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.

X ` Man[_3_] July 2nd 12 07:53 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.



What a nitwit you are.


Oscar July 2nd 12 08:07 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.



What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.


BAR[_2_] July 2nd 12 08:28 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article m,
says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.



What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.


Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed off
their potential members via a "choice."

JustWait[_2_] July 2nd 12 08:36 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.


Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...


X ` Man[_3_] July 2nd 12 09:04 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/12 3:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.


Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...


How many times have you been to a planned parenthood facility...and when?


X ` Man[_3_] July 2nd 12 09:04 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/12 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.


Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed off
their potential members via a "choice."


If your parents had availed themselves of the facility, they might have
had a son capable of going to college.


JustWait[_2_] July 2nd 12 10:32 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/2012 4:04 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 3:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges,
reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.

Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...


How many times have you been to a planned parenthood facility...and when?


I am certainly not going to address that with a scumbag like you... I
know how you use personal info and how far you will go to stalk
somebody... Remember Mad cow?


X ` Man[_3_] July 2nd 12 10:37 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/12 5:32 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 4:04 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 3:36 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,

says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges,
reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young
girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a
fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.

Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed
off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...


How many times have you been to a planned parenthood facility...and when?


I am certainly not going to address that with a scumbag like you... I
know how you use personal info and how far you will go to stalk
somebody... Remember Mad cow?



My guess is that you might have visited a clinic once many years ago
with a pregnant girlfriend and have not a clue as to what advice is
available these days.


Oscar July 3rd 12 02:59 AM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/2/2012 8:26 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:35:11 -0400, Oscar wrote:

On 7/2/2012 1:14 PM, X ` Man wrote:
...stupid to live in the south, but...it helps.


Federal judge halts Mississippi abortion law


TUPELO, Mississippi (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday temporarily
blocked Mississippi from enforcing a new law that requires doctors who
perform abortions at the state's sole abortion clinic to have admitting
privileges at a local hospital.

The state law, challenged last week by the Jackson Women's Health
Organization, has threatened to make Mississippi the only U.S. state
without an abortion clinic. It was set to take effect on Sunday.

U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Jordan entered a temporary restraining
order and set a hearing for July 11 to determine whether it should be
extended.

"In this case, plaintiffs have offered evidence — including quotes from
significant legislative and executive officers — that the act's purpose
is to eliminate abortions in Mississippi," Jordan found.

"They likewise submitted evidence that no safety or health concerns
motivated its passage. This evidence has not yet been rebutted."

The law signed by *Republican* Governor Phil Bryant in April requires
all doctors performing abortions at a Mississippi clinic to be certified
in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as to have admitting privileges at
a local hospital.

"The federal judge's decision is disappointing, and Governor Bryant
plans to work with state leaders to ensure this legislation properly
takes effect as soon as possible," spokesman Mick Bullock said.

The clinic challenged the new measure as unconstitutional for aiming to
effectively ban abortions in Mississippi, and also was seeking more time
to comply with the law.

Doctors at the Jackson health clinic already are certified in obstetrics
and gynecology, but have not been able to obtain privileges at any of
the half dozen hospitals within a 30-minute drive from the clinic,
despite trying since early May.

Republican state Representative Sam Mims, who sponsored the measure,
said the law aims to protect women.

POLITICAL STRATEGY?

Clinic owner Dianze Derzis called it a political strategy to ban
abortion in Mississippi without having to challenge Roe V. Wade. "It
isn't about anything but putting that clinic out of business," Derzis
told Reuters.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the clinic by the New
York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, cited several instances in
which state lawmakers publicly voiced hope the law would make
Mississippi abortion-free.

State health department inspectors had planned to check on the clinic's
compliance with the law Monday, but no inspection will take place, a
department spokeswoman said.

Attorneys for the state health department said in court papers the
clinic had ample time in the appeals process to explore options without
seeking a court injunction.

But clinic attorneys said the clinic and its doctors would be putting
themselves at risk by performing abortions outside the letter of the law
- despite the appeals process.

"Today's decision reaffirms the fundamental constitutional rights of
women in Mississippi and ensures the Jackson Women's Health Organization
can continue providing the critical reproductive health care that they
have offered to women for the last 17 years," said Nancy Northup,
president and chief executive at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Mims said he was disappointed by the injunction, "but the courts have
spoken, and we'll let the legal process begin."

Mississippi already has some of the country's strictest abortion laws
and one of the lowest abortion rates. It also has the highest teenage
pregnancy rate in the United States - more than 60 percent above the
national average in 2010.

The state became a battleground for reproductive rights last fall when
voters weighed in on a constitutional "personhood" amendment that
defined life as starting at the moment eggs are fertilized. Voters
rejected the proposed amendment.

Thirty-nine other states also require that OB-GYNs perform abortions,
and nine others mandate hospital privileges, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to sexual and reproductive
rights.

The Jackson Women's Health Organization has been providing services in
Mississippi since 1996. The nearest clinics outside the state are in
Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.

- - -

All part of the Republican war on women.


Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Define "hospital privileges."

As an aside, I'm one of the first in my family to have been born in a
hospital. I don't see that it has done anything more than drive up
costs, aided by the healthcare conglomerates. A reduction in services
accompanied by a MASSIVE increase in cost. Whaat a baargan!


You're crazy


iBoaterer[_2_] July 3rd 12 12:55 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

...stupid to live in the south, but...it helps.


Federal judge halts Mississippi abortion law


TUPELO, Mississippi (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday temporarily
blocked Mississippi from enforcing a new law that requires doctors who
perform abortions at the state's sole abortion clinic to have admitting
privileges at a local hospital.

The state law, challenged last week by the Jackson Women's Health
Organization, has threatened to make Mississippi the only U.S. state
without an abortion clinic. It was set to take effect on Sunday.

U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Jordan entered a temporary restraining
order and set a hearing for July 11 to determine whether it should be
extended.

"In this case, plaintiffs have offered evidence ? including quotes from
significant legislative and executive officers ? that the act's purpose
is to eliminate abortions in Mississippi," Jordan found.

"They likewise submitted evidence that no safety or health concerns
motivated its passage. This evidence has not yet been rebutted."

The law signed by *Republican* Governor Phil Bryant in April requires
all doctors performing abortions at a Mississippi clinic to be certified
in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as to have admitting privileges at
a local hospital.

"The federal judge's decision is disappointing, and Governor Bryant
plans to work with state leaders to ensure this legislation properly
takes effect as soon as possible," spokesman Mick Bullock said.

The clinic challenged the new measure as unconstitutional for aiming to
effectively ban abortions in Mississippi, and also was seeking more time
to comply with the law.

Doctors at the Jackson health clinic already are certified in obstetrics
and gynecology, but have not been able to obtain privileges at any of
the half dozen hospitals within a 30-minute drive from the clinic,
despite trying since early May.

Republican state Representative Sam Mims, who sponsored the measure,
said the law aims to protect women.

POLITICAL STRATEGY?

Clinic owner Dianze Derzis called it a political strategy to ban
abortion in Mississippi without having to challenge Roe V. Wade. "It
isn't about anything but putting that clinic out of business," Derzis
told Reuters.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the clinic by the New
York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, cited several instances in
which state lawmakers publicly voiced hope the law would make
Mississippi abortion-free.

State health department inspectors had planned to check on the clinic's
compliance with the law Monday, but no inspection will take place, a
department spokeswoman said.

Attorneys for the state health department said in court papers the
clinic had ample time in the appeals process to explore options without
seeking a court injunction.

But clinic attorneys said the clinic and its doctors would be putting
themselves at risk by performing abortions outside the letter of the law
- despite the appeals process.

"Today's decision reaffirms the fundamental constitutional rights of
women in Mississippi and ensures the Jackson Women's Health Organization
can continue providing the critical reproductive health care that they
have offered to women for the last 17 years," said Nancy Northup,
president and chief executive at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Mims said he was disappointed by the injunction, "but the courts have
spoken, and we'll let the legal process begin."

Mississippi already has some of the country's strictest abortion laws
and one of the lowest abortion rates. It also has the highest teenage
pregnancy rate in the United States - more than 60 percent above the
national average in 2010.

The state became a battleground for reproductive rights last fall when
voters weighed in on a constitutional "personhood" amendment that
defined life as starting at the moment eggs are fertilized. Voters
rejected the proposed amendment.

Thirty-nine other states also require that OB-GYNs perform abortions,
and nine others mandate hospital privileges, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to sexual and reproductive
rights.

The Jackson Women's Health Organization has been providing services in
Mississippi since 1996. The nearest clinics outside the state are in
Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.

- - -

All part of the Republican war on women.


That's our bigot Harry for you.

iBoaterer[_2_] July 3rd 12 12:56 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , says...

On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.


How does allowing a woman her right to choose control her? I know you
won't answer because it's just another of your insane ramblings.

iBoaterer[_2_] July 3rd 12 12:57 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , says...

On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,

says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.


Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...


Bull****.

Oscar July 3rd 12 01:42 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/3/2012 7:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,

says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges, reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.

Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...


Bull****.

You're right. They do get to choose the coathanger.


JustWait[_2_] July 3rd 12 01:53 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/3/2012 8:42 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/3/2012 7:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,

says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges,
reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young
girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a
fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.

Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed
off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...


Bull****.

You're right. They do get to choose the coathanger.


They don't even talk about any options...


JustWait[_2_] July 3rd 12 01:54 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/3/2012 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

...stupid to live in the south, but...it helps.


Federal judge halts Mississippi abortion law


TUPELO, Mississippi (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday temporarily
blocked Mississippi from enforcing a new law that requires doctors who
perform abortions at the state's sole abortion clinic to have admitting
privileges at a local hospital.

The state law, challenged last week by the Jackson Women's Health
Organization, has threatened to make Mississippi the only U.S. state
without an abortion clinic. It was set to take effect on Sunday.

U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Jordan entered a temporary restraining
order and set a hearing for July 11 to determine whether it should be
extended.

"In this case, plaintiffs have offered evidence ? including quotes from
significant legislative and executive officers ? that the act's purpose
is to eliminate abortions in Mississippi," Jordan found.

"They likewise submitted evidence that no safety or health concerns
motivated its passage. This evidence has not yet been rebutted."

The law signed by *Republican* Governor Phil Bryant in April requires
all doctors performing abortions at a Mississippi clinic to be certified
in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as to have admitting privileges at
a local hospital.

"The federal judge's decision is disappointing, and Governor Bryant
plans to work with state leaders to ensure this legislation properly
takes effect as soon as possible," spokesman Mick Bullock said.

The clinic challenged the new measure as unconstitutional for aiming to
effectively ban abortions in Mississippi, and also was seeking more time
to comply with the law.

Doctors at the Jackson health clinic already are certified in obstetrics
and gynecology, but have not been able to obtain privileges at any of
the half dozen hospitals within a 30-minute drive from the clinic,
despite trying since early May.

Republican state Representative Sam Mims, who sponsored the measure,
said the law aims to protect women.

POLITICAL STRATEGY?

Clinic owner Dianze Derzis called it a political strategy to ban
abortion in Mississippi without having to challenge Roe V. Wade. "It
isn't about anything but putting that clinic out of business," Derzis
told Reuters.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the clinic by the New
York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, cited several instances in
which state lawmakers publicly voiced hope the law would make
Mississippi abortion-free.

State health department inspectors had planned to check on the clinic's
compliance with the law Monday, but no inspection will take place, a
department spokeswoman said.

Attorneys for the state health department said in court papers the
clinic had ample time in the appeals process to explore options without
seeking a court injunction.

But clinic attorneys said the clinic and its doctors would be putting
themselves at risk by performing abortions outside the letter of the law
- despite the appeals process.

"Today's decision reaffirms the fundamental constitutional rights of
women in Mississippi and ensures the Jackson Women's Health Organization
can continue providing the critical reproductive health care that they
have offered to women for the last 17 years," said Nancy Northup,
president and chief executive at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Mims said he was disappointed by the injunction, "but the courts have
spoken, and we'll let the legal process begin."

Mississippi already has some of the country's strictest abortion laws
and one of the lowest abortion rates. It also has the highest teenage
pregnancy rate in the United States - more than 60 percent above the
national average in 2010.

The state became a battleground for reproductive rights last fall when
voters weighed in on a constitutional "personhood" amendment that
defined life as starting at the moment eggs are fertilized. Voters
rejected the proposed amendment.

Thirty-nine other states also require that OB-GYNs perform abortions,
and nine others mandate hospital privileges, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to sexual and reproductive
rights.

The Jackson Women's Health Organization has been providing services in
Mississippi since 1996. The nearest clinics outside the state are in
Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.

- - -

All part of the Republican war on women.


That's our bigot Harry for you.


The democrats are waging a war on women, minorities, and Americans...


X ` Man[_3_] July 3rd 12 02:02 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/3/12 8:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/3/2012 8:42 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/3/2012 7:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,

says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges,
reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young
girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a
fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.

Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed
off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...

Bull****.

You're right. They do get to choose the coathanger.


They don't even talk about any options...



There are only two options if you are a pregnant girl...

1. Have the baby.

2. Have an abortion.

At a good women's clinic, they can either provide a safe medical
abortion or recommend someone outside the clinic who do the procedure.

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 3rd 12 02:09 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , says...

On 7/3/2012 8:42 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/3/2012 7:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,

says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges,
reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young
girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a
fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.

Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed
off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...

Bull****.

You're right. They do get to choose the coathanger.


They don't even talk about any options...


Bull****.

iBoaterer[_2_] July 3rd 12 02:09 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , says...

On 7/3/2012 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

...stupid to live in the south, but...it helps.


Federal judge halts Mississippi abortion law


TUPELO, Mississippi (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday temporarily
blocked Mississippi from enforcing a new law that requires doctors who
perform abortions at the state's sole abortion clinic to have admitting
privileges at a local hospital.

The state law, challenged last week by the Jackson Women's Health
Organization, has threatened to make Mississippi the only U.S. state
without an abortion clinic. It was set to take effect on Sunday.

U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Jordan entered a temporary restraining
order and set a hearing for July 11 to determine whether it should be
extended.

"In this case, plaintiffs have offered evidence ? including quotes from
significant legislative and executive officers ? that the act's purpose
is to eliminate abortions in Mississippi," Jordan found.

"They likewise submitted evidence that no safety or health concerns
motivated its passage. This evidence has not yet been rebutted."

The law signed by *Republican* Governor Phil Bryant in April requires
all doctors performing abortions at a Mississippi clinic to be certified
in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as to have admitting privileges at
a local hospital.

"The federal judge's decision is disappointing, and Governor Bryant
plans to work with state leaders to ensure this legislation properly
takes effect as soon as possible," spokesman Mick Bullock said.

The clinic challenged the new measure as unconstitutional for aiming to
effectively ban abortions in Mississippi, and also was seeking more time
to comply with the law.

Doctors at the Jackson health clinic already are certified in obstetrics
and gynecology, but have not been able to obtain privileges at any of
the half dozen hospitals within a 30-minute drive from the clinic,
despite trying since early May.

Republican state Representative Sam Mims, who sponsored the measure,
said the law aims to protect women.

POLITICAL STRATEGY?

Clinic owner Dianze Derzis called it a political strategy to ban
abortion in Mississippi without having to challenge Roe V. Wade. "It
isn't about anything but putting that clinic out of business," Derzis
told Reuters.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the clinic by the New
York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, cited several instances in
which state lawmakers publicly voiced hope the law would make
Mississippi abortion-free.

State health department inspectors had planned to check on the clinic's
compliance with the law Monday, but no inspection will take place, a
department spokeswoman said.

Attorneys for the state health department said in court papers the
clinic had ample time in the appeals process to explore options without
seeking a court injunction.

But clinic attorneys said the clinic and its doctors would be putting
themselves at risk by performing abortions outside the letter of the law
- despite the appeals process.

"Today's decision reaffirms the fundamental constitutional rights of
women in Mississippi and ensures the Jackson Women's Health Organization
can continue providing the critical reproductive health care that they
have offered to women for the last 17 years," said Nancy Northup,
president and chief executive at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Mims said he was disappointed by the injunction, "but the courts have
spoken, and we'll let the legal process begin."

Mississippi already has some of the country's strictest abortion laws
and one of the lowest abortion rates. It also has the highest teenage
pregnancy rate in the United States - more than 60 percent above the
national average in 2010.

The state became a battleground for reproductive rights last fall when
voters weighed in on a constitutional "personhood" amendment that
defined life as starting at the moment eggs are fertilized. Voters
rejected the proposed amendment.

Thirty-nine other states also require that OB-GYNs perform abortions,
and nine others mandate hospital privileges, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to sexual and reproductive
rights.

The Jackson Women's Health Organization has been providing services in
Mississippi since 1996. The nearest clinics outside the state are in
Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.

- - -

All part of the Republican war on women.


That's our bigot Harry for you.


The democrats are waging a war on women, minorities, and Americans...


How so? By giving them a choice?

Oscar July 3rd 12 02:18 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/3/2012 8:53 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/3/2012 8:42 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/3/2012 7:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/2/2012 3:28 PM, BAR wrote:
In article m,

says...

On 7/2/2012 2:53 PM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/2/12 2:43 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/2/2012 1:35 PM, Oscar wrote:

Would you allow a doctor, who doesn't have hospital privileges,
reach
inside your body? Didn't think so.


Abortion is one way the dems control women and of course young
girls.


What a nitwit you are.

Didn't you once say, "It's not an unborn baby, it's just a
fetus". A
rational person would say only a nitwit could say that.

Just think how big the Democrat party would be if they hadn't killed
off
their potential members via a "choice."


Have you ever been to a planned abortionhood clearinghouse? There is no
choice...

Bull****.

You're right. They do get to choose the coathanger.


They don't even talk about any options...

They are in the business of doing abortions. They have an agenda. Rip
baby rip. If a woman has doubts she should seek counseling from her
doctor, clergy, family, medicaid/welfare councilor, etc.


Eisboch[_8_] July 4th 12 02:47 AM

You don't have to be really...
 


"X ` Man" wrote in message
m...

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.

--------------------------------------------------

How about the millions of women ... Republicans and Democrats alike,
who oppose
abortion? Are they attempting to control women and their bodies?



X ` Man[_3_] July 4th 12 02:54 AM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/3/12 9:47 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"X ` Man" wrote in message
m...

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.

--------------------------------------------------

How about the millions of women ... Republicans and Democrats alike, who
oppose
abortion? Are they attempting to control women and their bodies?



A lot of them are.

jps July 4th 12 06:34 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:54:22 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 7/3/2012 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

...stupid to live in the south, but...it helps.


Federal judge halts Mississippi abortion law


TUPELO, Mississippi (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday temporarily
blocked Mississippi from enforcing a new law that requires doctors who
perform abortions at the state's sole abortion clinic to have admitting
privileges at a local hospital.

The state law, challenged last week by the Jackson Women's Health
Organization, has threatened to make Mississippi the only U.S. state
without an abortion clinic. It was set to take effect on Sunday.

U.S. District Court Judge Daniel Jordan entered a temporary restraining
order and set a hearing for July 11 to determine whether it should be
extended.

"In this case, plaintiffs have offered evidence ? including quotes from
significant legislative and executive officers ? that the act's purpose
is to eliminate abortions in Mississippi," Jordan found.

"They likewise submitted evidence that no safety or health concerns
motivated its passage. This evidence has not yet been rebutted."

The law signed by *Republican* Governor Phil Bryant in April requires
all doctors performing abortions at a Mississippi clinic to be certified
in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as to have admitting privileges at
a local hospital.

"The federal judge's decision is disappointing, and Governor Bryant
plans to work with state leaders to ensure this legislation properly
takes effect as soon as possible," spokesman Mick Bullock said.

The clinic challenged the new measure as unconstitutional for aiming to
effectively ban abortions in Mississippi, and also was seeking more time
to comply with the law.

Doctors at the Jackson health clinic already are certified in obstetrics
and gynecology, but have not been able to obtain privileges at any of
the half dozen hospitals within a 30-minute drive from the clinic,
despite trying since early May.

Republican state Representative Sam Mims, who sponsored the measure,
said the law aims to protect women.

POLITICAL STRATEGY?

Clinic owner Dianze Derzis called it a political strategy to ban
abortion in Mississippi without having to challenge Roe V. Wade. "It
isn't about anything but putting that clinic out of business," Derzis
told Reuters.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the clinic by the New
York-based Center for Reproductive Rights, cited several instances in
which state lawmakers publicly voiced hope the law would make
Mississippi abortion-free.

State health department inspectors had planned to check on the clinic's
compliance with the law Monday, but no inspection will take place, a
department spokeswoman said.

Attorneys for the state health department said in court papers the
clinic had ample time in the appeals process to explore options without
seeking a court injunction.

But clinic attorneys said the clinic and its doctors would be putting
themselves at risk by performing abortions outside the letter of the law
- despite the appeals process.

"Today's decision reaffirms the fundamental constitutional rights of
women in Mississippi and ensures the Jackson Women's Health Organization
can continue providing the critical reproductive health care that they
have offered to women for the last 17 years," said Nancy Northup,
president and chief executive at the Center for Reproductive Rights.

Mims said he was disappointed by the injunction, "but the courts have
spoken, and we'll let the legal process begin."

Mississippi already has some of the country's strictest abortion laws
and one of the lowest abortion rates. It also has the highest teenage
pregnancy rate in the United States - more than 60 percent above the
national average in 2010.

The state became a battleground for reproductive rights last fall when
voters weighed in on a constitutional "personhood" amendment that
defined life as starting at the moment eggs are fertilized. Voters
rejected the proposed amendment.

Thirty-nine other states also require that OB-GYNs perform abortions,
and nine others mandate hospital privileges, according to the Guttmacher
Institute, a nonprofit organization dedicated to sexual and reproductive
rights.

The Jackson Women's Health Organization has been providing services in
Mississippi since 1996. The nearest clinics outside the state are in
Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana.

- - -

All part of the Republican war on women.


That's our bigot Harry for you.


The democrats are waging a war on women, minorities, and Americans...


Saying something doesn't make it true. But I don't think you're smart
enough to realize you're lying.

jps July 4th 12 06:39 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:47:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"X ` Man" wrote in message
om...

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.

--------------------------------------------------

How about the millions of women ... Republicans and Democrats alike,
who oppose
abortion? Are they attempting to control women and their bodies?


You make no distinction between those who oppose but think it's still
a woman's choice and those who oppose and who'd make it illegal.

The latter is a much smaller percentage than the former.

Jim July 4th 12 07:09 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/4/2012 1:39 PM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:47:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"X ` Man" wrote in message
m...

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.

--------------------------------------------------

How about the millions of women ... Republicans and Democrats alike,
who oppose
abortion? Are they attempting to control women and their bodies?


You make no distinction between those who oppose but think it's still
a woman's choice and those who oppose and who'd make it illegal.

The latter is a much smaller percentage than the former.

I'll get to work righaway and see if I can verify your claim. Don't wait up.


Eisboch[_8_] July 5th 12 12:02 PM

You don't have to be really...
 


"jps" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:47:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"X ` Man" wrote in message
om...

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.

--------------------------------------------------

How about the millions of women ... Republicans and Democrats alike,
who oppose
abortion? Are they attempting to control women and their bodies?


You make no distinction between those who oppose but think it's still
a woman's choice and those who oppose and who'd make it illegal.

-----------------------------------------------

Exactly my point. Neither did Harry.

Eisboch


X ` Man[_3_] July 5th 12 12:14 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/5/12 7:02 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"jps" wrote in message ...

On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:47:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"X ` Man" wrote in message
m...

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.

--------------------------------------------------

How about the millions of women ... Republicans and Democrats alike,
who oppose
abortion? Are they attempting to control women and their bodies?


You make no distinction between those who oppose but think it's still
a woman's choice and those who oppose and who'd make it illegal.

-----------------------------------------------

Exactly my point. Neither did Harry.

Eisboch


The "right to life" movement is fatally contaminated by the huge numbers
of proponents who don't give a rat's ass about children born into
horrific poverty, or about the hypocrisy of supporting fetuses and
capital punishment, or the hypocrisy about starting wars of convenience
that end up killing thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions.

I have no objection to honest people who oppose abortion on "moral
grounds," but who do not try to restrict the availability of abortion to
those who want one.

If you don't want an abortion, don't get one.

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.

Oscar July 5th 12 01:25 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/5/2012 7:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/5/12 7:02 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:47:11 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"X ` Man" wrote in message
m...

The Republican objection to abortion is not based upon morality but,
rather, on attempts to control women and their bodies.

--------------------------------------------------

How about the millions of women ... Republicans and Democrats alike,
who oppose
abortion? Are they attempting to control women and their bodies?


You make no distinction between those who oppose but think it's still
a woman's choice and those who oppose and who'd make it illegal.

-----------------------------------------------

Exactly my point. Neither did Harry.

Eisboch


The "right to life" movement is fatally contaminated by the huge numbers
of proponents who don't give a rat's ass about children born into
horrific poverty, or about the hypocrisy of supporting fetuses and
capital punishment, or the hypocrisy about starting wars of convenience
that end up killing thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions.

I have no objection to honest people who oppose abortion on "moral
grounds," but who do not try to restrict the availability of abortion to
those who want one.

If you don't want an abortion, don't get one.

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women


Well that's the way your mind works. It might be what you BELIEVE but
it's not necessarily a fact. So please don't try to pass off what gets
manipulated in your mind as fact.

You insult your readers by underestimating their intelligence.


Boating All Out July 5th 12 06:55 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...


I'm sorry, Richard, but I don't see you as part of the "conservative"
problem. I hope that doesn't hurt too much! :)


Anybody who votes Rep is a problem.
That party is now radical/extremist in nature, and vote for legislation
in lockstep, according to their most extremist views.
The Rep party proudly label themselves "conservative."
Anybody not hewing to the most extreme line gets "primaried."
Where the **** have you guys been the last few years!?
Neither one of you ever heard the words "moderate" and "independent?"
Easy to say words, and "goals" and "paths" are simple words too.
I got news for both of you. Words have meaning. Some meanings change.
"Gay" has a different meaning than it did 30 years ago.
"Republican" and "conservative" don't mean what they did 5 years ago.
Cut the bull****, and talk turkey.
Until you agree on goals and paths, you'll get nowhere.
There's a term for no agreement too - "status-quo."
Go for that, and your ass will get run over by two juggernaut words.
"History" and "progress."




thumper July 6th 12 06:59 AM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.


Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...


JustWait[_2_] July 6th 12 07:17 AM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.


Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically
liberal.


Oscar July 6th 12 12:40 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.


Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...

I'm all for the education. Especially for those who can't read or follow
directions.
Insert pill in mouth and swallow. It really isn't that hard.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 6th 12 12:55 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.


Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically
liberal.


It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.

X ` Man July 6th 12 01:30 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically
liberal.


It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.




iBoaterer[_2_] July 6th 12 02:45 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically
liberal.


It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.


I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work.

X ` Man[_3_] July 6th 12 03:05 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically
liberal.

It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.


I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work.


One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who
offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is
that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens
of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than
the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and
religiously based home schooling, for example.


Oscar July 6th 12 03:18 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly
wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically
liberal.

It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't
want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.


I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work.


One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who
offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is
that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens
of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than
the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and
religiously based home schooling, for example.

Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are
on the watch list.


iBoaterer[_2_] July 6th 12 03:20 PM

You don't have to be really...
 
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically
liberal.

It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.


I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work.


One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who
offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is
that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens
of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than
the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and
religiously based home schooling, for example.


Adolescents are going to be adolescents!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com