|
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh, wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Adolescents are going to be adolescents! Precisely. |
You don't have to be really...
In article , says...
On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? I am sure sex is *not* fun when Scotty is a participant. Ask any woman. :) |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... He's just cruising to get folks going. He can't possibly believe the dumb things he says. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? Are you promoting sex between children, same sex or otherwise? If so, put your own name on the watch list. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:29 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Adolescents are going to be adolescents! Precisely. And that's why good parenting is so important. |
You don't have to be really...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh, wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin. That's low. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 11:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh, wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin. That's low. As I said, I am reality based. I'm speaking to statistics. Snotty lives in La-La Land. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? Are you promoting sex between children, same sex or otherwise? If so, put your own name on the watch list. Harry has already promoted sex with children, I have the thread saved. I asked him if ten was too young for a little girl who had been raped by an adult to be sneaked over state lines for an abortion and to avoid prosecution, without parental concent or even notification, he answered with a resounding "no, 10 is not to young"... He has always taken a stand that would protect old white pedophiles over women and children. He should be on any watch list for sexual predators... and I am sure he is. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 11:37 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:41 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? Are you promoting sex between children, same sex or otherwise? If so, put your own name on the watch list. Harry has already promoted sex with children, I have the thread saved. I asked him if ten was too young for a little girl who had been raped by an adult to be sneaked over state lines for an abortion and to avoid prosecution, without parental concent or even notification, he answered with a resounding "no, 10 is not to young"... He has always taken a stand that would protect old white pedophiles over women and children. He should be on any watch list for sexual predators... and I am sure he is. And once again you prove you are an ignorant ass, incapable of reading comprehension. Further, if there is or was a 10 year old girl in your area who needed an abortion, you're probably the one who impregnated here. In your tent. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 11:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh, wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin. That's low. Havent you learned yet, what to expect from the maryland gutter troll? |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:
I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 7:18 AM, Oscar wrote:
Gag me with a spoon. Valley girl...? |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 4:40 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... I'm all for the education. Especially for those who can't read or follow directions. Insert pill in mouth and swallow. It really isn't that hard. See, we agree on something. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:11 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/6/2012 7:18 AM, Oscar wrote: Gag me with a spoon. Valley girl...? Thumper?...... Beaver? |
You don't have to be really...
In article , lid says...
On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. |
You don't have to be really...
In article om, 5@
5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. |
You don't have to be really...
In article ,
says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? |
You don't have to be really...
On Jul 8, 7:22*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. *Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote:
On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? |
You don't have to be really...
In article om, 5@
5.com says... On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. Harry is trying to justify his pedophilic tendencies again. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 9:37 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? Maybe this will help you understand Harry Krause, Iboaterer and those of sinilar mindset. http://www.aryan-nations.org/ |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 9:53 AM, BAR wrote:
In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. Harry is trying to justify his pedophilic tendencies again. He hasn't exactly hidden these feelings over the years, he is probably the nastiest human being I have ever encountered in my short lifetime... |
You don't have to be really...
In article m,
says... On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. I agree! |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/12 10:04 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/8/2012 9:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. Harry is trying to justify his pedophilic tendencies again. He hasn't exactly hidden these feelings over the years, he is probably the nastiest human being I have ever encountered in my short lifetime... You and BAR have something in common...almost no meaningful formal education and therefore no understanding of many of the polysyllabic words you misuse. Not being against older teens of approximately the same age enjoying safe sex with each other doesn't make one a fan of pedophilia. |
You don't have to be really...
In article , says...
On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? You are so whacked out it isn't even funny anymore. Who said a damned thing about being "poor"? Have you ever seen a newborn baby who is a crack addict at birth because the mother was one? I have. Have you ever seen a newborn writhing in pain because it's brain stem is exposed? I have. And your above bull**** about deciding who lives and who dies, etc. is just that. A ****ing FOX talking point. Here's what is truly "dangerous", republicans who don't think that because a human is female that they don't have the right to choose what THEY want to do. |
You don't have to be really...
In article om,
says... On 7/8/2012 9:37 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? Maybe this will help you understand Harry Krause, Iboaterer and those of sinilar mindset. http://www.aryan-nations.org/ You don't know a ****ing thing about me. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 10:09 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/8/12 10:04 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/8/2012 9:53 AM, BAR wrote: In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. Harry is trying to justify his pedophilic tendencies again. He hasn't exactly hidden these feelings over the years, he is probably the nastiest human being I have ever encountered in my short lifetime... You and BAR have something in common...almost no meaningful formal education and therefore no understanding of many of the polysyllabic words you misuse. Not being against older teens of approximately the same age enjoying safe sex with each other doesn't make one a fan of pedophilia. You didn't say "older teens" when you first made the comment. You said "teens". |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 10:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m, says... On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. I agree! Good. Now let's try to convince Harry. I think he needs to see that disturbing abortion video. |
You don't have to be really...
In article om,
says... On 7/8/2012 10:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. I agree! Good. Now let's try to convince Harry. I think he needs to see that disturbing abortion video. The trouble is, it's been proven over and over again that trying to get adolescents to abstain from sex is futile. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 11:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/8/2012 10:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. I agree! Good. Now let's try to convince Harry. I think he needs to see that disturbing abortion video. The trouble is, it's been proven over and over again that trying to get adolescents to abstain from sex is futile. Contrary to popular belief, Harry is not a adolescent anymore. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/12 11:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
The trouble is, it's been proven over and over again that trying to get adolescents to abstain from sex is futile. Decades ago, one of the big fundie churches in Jacksonville (and there are many of them) insisted its teens take pledges to abstain from premarital sex. Five years later, the result? More unwed pregnancies among these teens than among the same demographics in the general population. I've never understood the "hangups" Americans suffer about sex and force upon their teen-agers. If you are practicing consensual safe sex and you are teens of about the same age, you're doing what comes naturally. |
You don't have to be really...
In article om,
says... On 7/8/2012 11:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/8/2012 10:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. I agree! Good. Now let's try to convince Harry. I think he needs to see that disturbing abortion video. The trouble is, it's been proven over and over again that trying to get adolescents to abstain from sex is futile. Contrary to popular belief, Harry is not a adolescent anymore. WHOOOOOOSH....... |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 11:48 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/8/12 11:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote: The trouble is, it's been proven over and over again that trying to get adolescents to abstain from sex is futile. Decades ago, one of the big fundie churches in Jacksonville (and there are many of them) insisted its teens take pledges to abstain from premarital sex. Five years later, the result? More unwed pregnancies among these teens than among the same demographics in the general population. I've never understood the "hangups" Americans suffer about sex and force upon their teen-agers. If you are practicing consensual safe sex and you are teens of about the same age, you're doing what comes naturally. Let it all hang out? Is that what you are saying? Why is it you are so scared to death to teach discipline and self discipline to the younger folk? People like you led us down the destructive path we are on and you don't have any idea how to properly change direction. Thanks a bunch "Me Generation". |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/8/2012 11:52 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/8/2012 11:34 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article om, says... On 7/8/2012 10:07 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article m, says... On 7/8/2012 8:22 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , lid says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? If you don't want to watch it grow, don't sow the seed. Unless you can engineer a better solution. I agree! Good. Now let's try to convince Harry. I think he needs to see that disturbing abortion video. The trouble is, it's been proven over and over again that trying to get adolescents to abstain from sex is futile. Contrary to popular belief, Harry is not a adolescent anymore. WHOOOOOOSH....... Nope. Takes a better man than you to Whoooooosh me. I just wouldn't let you turn the topic. Topic changing is an old Plume trick. |
You don't have to be really...
On Jul 8, 9:13*am, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om, says... On 7/8/2012 9:37 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/8/2012 9:12 AM, Tim wrote: On Jul 8, 7:22 am, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... In article om, 5@ 5.com says... On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote: I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. *Do you have any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort? Do you know how non-natural abortion occur? http://abortioninstruments.com/ Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he watches it. I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion. So you think that people with souls would like to see babies growing up in an environment like poverty, malnourished, drugs, etc.? Would you people with souls like to see babies that are horrendously handicapped suffer through life for a few years until they finally die an agonizing death? Then again, even with the conditions you're listed, a lot of the most famous and greatest minds would have been conveniently aborted. Some examples would be able Lincoln, and Steven Hawkings. You have to understand the dangerous mindset of a progressive. They would get to decide who lives and dies, just like health care and abortion. Our friend above obviously doesn't think poor kids should be allowed to be born, or the poor, or those whose parents do drugs... Imagine if he were in charge of your daughters health care, even worse, imagine if harry got to decide who get services, or aborted...??? Maybe this will help you understand Harry Krause, Iboaterer and those of similar mindset. http://www.aryan-nations.org/ You don't know a ****ing thing about me. There are two "Iboaterer's " on here. on Google groups they show up in different colors. Not hard to distinguish who is who |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com