You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/6/2012 10:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose
abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly
wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest
level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How
typically
liberal.

It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't
want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of
something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the
third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds
progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to
prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get
along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in
such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by
their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and
against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and
among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The
prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they
want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.

I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work.


One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who
offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is
that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens
of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than
the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and
religiously based home schooling, for example.

Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you
are
on the watch list.


He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the
reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG
posters because of him...

YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot
calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to
you? That sex is fun???

Are you promoting sex between children, same sex or otherwise? If so,
put your own name on the watch list.


Harry has already promoted sex with children, I have the thread saved. I
asked him if ten was too young for a little girl who had been raped by
an adult to be sneaked over state lines for an abortion and to avoid
prosecution, without parental concent or even notification, he answered
with a resounding "no, 10 is not to young"... He has always taken a
stand that would protect old white pedophiles over women and children.
He should be on any watch list for sexual predators... and I am sure he is.

You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/6/12 11:37 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:41 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose
abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they
truly
wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest
level, you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How
typically
liberal.

It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still
don't
want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of
something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the
third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds
progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to
prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get
along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in
such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by
their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and
against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and
among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The
prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they
want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or
means.

I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work.


One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who
offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it.
Another is
that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between
teens
of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful
than
the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and
religiously based home schooling, for example.

Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you
are
on the watch list.


He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the
reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost
two OG
posters because of him...

YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot
calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to
you? That sex is fun???

Are you promoting sex between children, same sex or otherwise? If so,
put your own name on the watch list.


Harry has already promoted sex with children, I have the thread saved. I
asked him if ten was too young for a little girl who had been raped by
an adult to be sneaked over state lines for an abortion and to avoid
prosecution, without parental concent or even notification, he answered
with a resounding "no, 10 is not to young"... He has always taken a
stand that would protect old white pedophiles over women and children.
He should be on any watch list for sexual predators... and I am sure he is.



And once again you prove you are an ignorant ass, incapable of reading
comprehension. Further, if there is or was a 10 year old girl in your
area who needed an abortion, you're probably the one who impregnated
here. In your tent.

You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/6/2012 11:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on-
says...

On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion
are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly
wanted
to minimize abortion...


So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level,
you
feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How
typically
liberal.

It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't
want
contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something
that doesn't work. How typically conservative.



D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically
"church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.*

What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and
relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or
fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so
that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really
curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent
pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get
along
with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in
such a
program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their
early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are
equipped to handle it responsibly.

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and
against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they
want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.

I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work.


One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who
offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is
that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens
of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than
the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and
religiously based home schooling, for example.

Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are
on the watch list.


He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the
reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG
posters because of him...



Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How
old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh,
wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin.

That's low.

Havent you learned yet, what to expect from the maryland gutter troll?

You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.

Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have
any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort?

You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/6/2012 7:18 AM, Oscar wrote:
Gag me with a spoon.

Valley girl...?

You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/6/2012 4:40 AM, Oscar wrote:
On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote:
On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote:

In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are
trying to control women.

Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted
to minimize abortion...

I'm all for the education. Especially for those who can't read or follow
directions.
Insert pill in mouth and swallow. It really isn't that hard.

See, we agree on something.

You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/6/2012 10:11 PM, thumper wrote:
On 7/6/2012 7:18 AM, Oscar wrote:
Gag me with a spoon.

Valley girl...?


Thumper?...... Beaver?

You don't have to be really...
 

In article , lid says...

On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.

Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have
any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort?

Do you know how non-natural abortion occur?

http://abortioninstruments.com/

You don't have to be really...
 

On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , lid says...

On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.

Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have
any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort?

Do you know how non-natural abortion occur?

http://abortioninstruments.com/

Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he
watches it.

You don't have to be really...
 

In article om, 5@
5.com says...

On 7/7/2012 10:12 AM, BAR wrote:
In article , lid says...

On 7/6/2012 5:30 AM, X ` Man wrote:

I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against
premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among
the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of
course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want
is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means.

Not to mention that 'God' is the biggest abortionist ever. Do you have
any idea how many pregnancies naturally abort?

Do you know how non-natural abortion occur?

http://abortioninstruments.com/

Wow. That's powerful. Krause might be singing a different tune after he
watches it.

I didn't watch the video except for the first couple of seconds. I can't
see where anyone with a soul can be pro abortion.