|
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh, wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Adolescents are going to be adolescents! Precisely. |
You don't have to be really...
In article , says...
On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? I am sure sex is *not* fun when Scotty is a participant. Ask any woman. :) |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote:
On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... He's just cruising to get folks going. He can't possibly believe the dumb things he says. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:32 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says... On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... YOU talking about someone else getting vulgar???? That IS the pot calling the kettle black. Now what did he say above that was vulgar to you? That sex is fun??? Are you promoting sex between children, same sex or otherwise? If so, put your own name on the watch list. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/2012 10:29 AM, X ` Man wrote:
On 7/6/12 10:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Adolescents are going to be adolescents! Precisely. And that's why good parenting is so important. |
You don't have to be really...
In article , dump-on-
says... On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh, wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin. That's low. |
You don't have to be really...
On 7/6/12 11:02 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , dump-on- says... On 7/6/12 10:21 AM, JustWait wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:18 AM, Oscar wrote: On 7/6/2012 10:05 AM, X ` Man wrote: On 7/6/12 9:45 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/12 7:55 AM, iBoaterer wrote: In article , says... On 7/6/2012 1:59 AM, thumper wrote: On 7/5/2012 4:14 AM, X ` Man wrote: In the end, I believe the majority of those who oppose abortion are trying to control women. Especially those opposing contraception education. If they truly wanted to minimize abortion... So, because you have taken the argument to it's shallowest level, you feel you have won and there is nothing more to discuss. How typically liberal. It's been proven that abstinence doesn't work. But, you still don't want contraceptive education or abortion. You just want more of something that doesn't work. How typically conservative. D'uh. Abstinence works, dummy. What doesn't work is the typically "church moral" *abstinence edu-ma-cat-shun.* What is needed in the public schools is a comprehensive sex and relationship education program that begins, probably, in the third or fourth grade with the simple facts of life and builds progressively so that by the time kids are in the sixth or seventh grade and really curious and experimenting sexually, they know precisely how to prevent pregnancies, how to prevent transmissions of STDs, and how to get along with others. Certainly, abstinence can be part of the teaching in such a program. The reality is that most kids are going to have sex by their early teens and the best thing society can do is make sure they are equipped to handle it responsibly. I get a kick out of the religious prigs who preach the bible and against premarital sex. The bible is full of premarital sex and lust and among the very young. Read the Song of Solomon, for starters. The prigs, of course, interpret the bible to preach what they want, but what they want is not necessarily the same as what their "good book" says or means. I should have said that abstinence EDUCATION doesn't work. One of the many reasons why it doesn't work is that most of those who offer it up are hypocritical assholes and the kids know it. Another is that sex is fun, and if practiced voluntarily and safely between teens of approximately the same age is harmless, certainly less harmful than the mind****ing that goes on in fundie churches and schools and religiously based home schooling, for example. Gag me with a spoon. Your post was retched. No wonder folks like you are on the watch list. He will get more and more outrageous and vulgar till he gets the reaction he wants. Last time the abortion thing got going we lost two OG posters because of him... Yeah, I'm reality based and you two degenerates live in la-la land. How old do you think Ms. Pink Hair was when she became sexually active? Oh, wait...DaddyDummy thinks she is still a virgin. That's low. As I said, I am reality based. I'm speaking to statistics. Snotty lives in La-La Land. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com