On Jun 2, 2:39*pm, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...











On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, *wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.

Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Your Girlfriend likes pollution... Just look at what pours out of his
pie hole day after day.

On 6/2/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Um, if that's what you got from my post, you need to go back and read it
again, this time without the axe to grind... snerk

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:25:00 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:11:33 -0400, wrote:


Somebody up there must be running a full panel of water quality
measurements but I can't find it.

Not enough info here?

http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiol...lthtoxicology/

The site looks like it hasn't been updated since 2005 (the USGS data)

All of these sites seem to have one axe to grind and they glaze over
everything else. This one seems to be going for organics and metals.

Pick the best stone to grind your axe on to ensure that you sharpen your
axe. It is like poll shopping.

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

Upon what, Kevin, would you base such a supposition?

In article , dump-on-
says...

On 6/2/12 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


The military is damned good at polluting waterways, too.

As well as land.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:31:30 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.

What went wrong?

The DC government still has not fixed a 19th century sewer system.
When it rains the storm drains that share pipe with the sewers
overload the system and they dump raw effluent from 53 different
spillways directly into the Potomac or it's tributaries.
That is what WSSC admits to in the link John posted.
Then you have the nutrient load from the Blue Plains plant when things
are working perfectly.

They have banned summer fertilizer sales here for a nutrient problem
that pales by comparison

I suppose you could just say it is a city problem and any time you put
that many toilets in that small an area you overload nature's
mechanism for dealing with it.

It would be interesting to see the NPDES permits for other big cities
to see how they are doing.,

All of that takes MAJOR money, and the right wing doesn't want the
government to spend.

In article , says...

On 6/2/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Um, if that's what you got from my post, you need to go back and read it
again, this time without the axe to grind... snerk

Well, I think I read it more thoroughly than you. Because YOU said:

"I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true."

When in fact, they've made a LOT of progress.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:25:00 -0400, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:11:33 -0400, wrote:


Somebody up there must be running a full panel of water quality
measurements but I can't find it.

Not enough info here?

http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiol...lthtoxicology/

The site looks like it hasn't been updated since 2005 (the USGS data)

All of these sites seem to have one axe to grind and they glaze over
everything else. This one seems to be going for organics and metals.

Pick the best stone to grind your axe on to ensure that you sharpen your
axe. It is like poll shopping.

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

Upon what, Kevin, would you base such a supposition?

On your stupid, idiotic position that I'm Kevin, you piece of ****.

On 6/3/2012 7:27 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 1:39 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 6/2/2012 12:18 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.


Forgot the link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockanum_River

"Historically used for industry, the river has in recent years had
hiking trails and linear parks developed along its banks. The banks of
the river are slowly being cleaned up after years of pollution and
dumping."

That's a bad thing in your eyes?

Um, if that's what you got from my post, you need to go back and read it
again, this time without the axe to grind...snerk

Well, I think I read it more thoroughly than you. Because YOU said:

"I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true."

When in fact, they've made a LOT of progress.

You stupid ****.. You are responding to me, and talking about a quote
Greg made about a differnet river.... I don't suppose I will get an
apology? LOL!!

On 6/3/2012 7:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:31:30 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.

What went wrong?

The DC government still has not fixed a 19th century sewer system.
When it rains the storm drains that share pipe with the sewers
overload the system and they dump raw effluent from 53 different
spillways directly into the Potomac or it's tributaries.
That is what WSSC admits to in the link John posted.
Then you have the nutrient load from the Blue Plains plant when things
are working perfectly.

They have banned summer fertilizer sales here for a nutrient problem
that pales by comparison

I suppose you could just say it is a city problem and any time you put
that many toilets in that small an area you overload nature's
mechanism for dealing with it.

It would be interesting to see the NPDES permits for other big cities
to see how they are doing.,

All of that takes MAJOR money, and the right wing doesn't want the
government to spend.

Wow, you mean the boogie man wants' dirty water?? LOL!

In article , says...

On 6/3/2012 7:25 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 13:31:30 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:48:44 -0400, wrote:

I suppose in your mind polluting our waterways is okay?

It seems to be when it is the DC government doing it.

I was amazed that 50 years after the feds decided to clean up the
river that it is still so bad. I really believed they were making
measurable progress but from what I am reading, sadly, that is not
true.

What went wrong?

The DC government still has not fixed a 19th century sewer system.
When it rains the storm drains that share pipe with the sewers
overload the system and they dump raw effluent from 53 different
spillways directly into the Potomac or it's tributaries.
That is what WSSC admits to in the link John posted.
Then you have the nutrient load from the Blue Plains plant when things
are working perfectly.

They have banned summer fertilizer sales here for a nutrient problem
that pales by comparison

I suppose you could just say it is a city problem and any time you put
that many toilets in that small an area you overload nature's
mechanism for dealing with it.

It would be interesting to see the NPDES permits for other big cities
to see how they are doing.,

All of that takes MAJOR money, and the right wing doesn't want the
government to spend.

Wow, you mean the boogie man wants' dirty water?? LOL!

No, I mean WTF I said.