Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,646
Default For animal lovers...

On 5/4/12 2:54 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:50:50 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 4 May 2012 12:06:26 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...



Well it figures that you'd think that killing an animal is saving it.

Figures you would bring it down to the single animal level to make a
point, when the conversation is about hunting in general... Frekin'
engineers...snicker

What engineers came up with the notion that hunting in general is a good
thing? But, it DOES come down to the single animal. It's that simple. I
guess, that because of overpopulation of humans on the earth, then you
should be okay with killing off people, abortion, etc. right?

Without the money hunters pump into the system you might actually come
down to that single animal, starving to death and bringing on
extinction.
The animal lovers barely collect enough money to support their own
bureaucracy and put virtually nothing into conservation efforts.

The best example is the hunting ranches in Texas that hold the largest
populations of endangered African animals on the planet. Without the
incentive of allowing someone to shoot one now and then for outrageous
amounts of money, they would simply go extinct.
These ranchers ensure that there is always a healthy breeding
population and suitable habitat for them. That is a lot more than the
Africans are doing.
I find it strange that the animal rights people would rather see an
entire species go extinct than to allow them to be managed for profit.
I wonder what our grand kids would say about that after the animals
are gone forever.

I know that in the imaginary utopia you lefties live in, animal lovers
would buy and maintain millions of acres of pristine habitat for the
animals to live in peace but the fact is, the animal lovers want
someone else to pay for that.
Those people are hunters.
They do it via a surcharge on all hunting equipment, license fees,
private club dues and direct payments to land owners for the right to
hunt there.


Well, kill 'em all then.


You will if you shut down the hunting ranches where these exotics are
raised. It is certain that the Africans are not going to save them.



I suppose to pseudo machomen, "canned" hunting is real.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,020
Default For animal lovers...

On 5/4/12 3:44 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 04 May 2012 15:24:53 -0400, X `
wrote:

On 5/4/12 2:54 PM,
wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2012 13:50:50 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Fri, 4 May 2012 12:06:26 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...



Well it figures that you'd think that killing an animal is saving it.

Figures you would bring it down to the single animal level to make a
point, when the conversation is about hunting in general... Frekin'
engineers...snicker

What engineers came up with the notion that hunting in general is a good
thing? But, it DOES come down to the single animal. It's that simple. I
guess, that because of overpopulation of humans on the earth, then you
should be okay with killing off people, abortion, etc. right?

Without the money hunters pump into the system you might actually come
down to that single animal, starving to death and bringing on
extinction.
The animal lovers barely collect enough money to support their own
bureaucracy and put virtually nothing into conservation efforts.

The best example is the hunting ranches in Texas that hold the largest
populations of endangered African animals on the planet. Without the
incentive of allowing someone to shoot one now and then for outrageous
amounts of money, they would simply go extinct.
These ranchers ensure that there is always a healthy breeding
population and suitable habitat for them. That is a lot more than the
Africans are doing.
I find it strange that the animal rights people would rather see an
entire species go extinct than to allow them to be managed for profit.
I wonder what our grand kids would say about that after the animals
are gone forever.

I know that in the imaginary utopia you lefties live in, animal lovers
would buy and maintain millions of acres of pristine habitat for the
animals to live in peace but the fact is, the animal lovers want
someone else to pay for that.
Those people are hunters.
They do it via a surcharge on all hunting equipment, license fees,
private club dues and direct payments to land owners for the right to
hunt there.

Well, kill 'em all then.

You will if you shut down the hunting ranches where these exotics are
raised. It is certain that the Africans are not going to save them.



I suppose to pseudo machomen, "canned" hunting is real.


I am not a fan of canned hunts but I am more opposed to extinction.

In fact most of these exotic hunts do not guarantee that the hunter
actually gets anything.


You mean, they let the animals out of their pens for the "hunt"?
:)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Animal Welfare or "animal rights"? Leif Erikson General 3 April 25th 11 03:19 PM
A fact concerning livestock animal husbandry Fred C. Dobbs General 0 June 24th 10 06:20 AM
Don't forget - tonight - Animal Planet... Wizard of Woodstock General 3 June 6th 09 12:59 AM
Animal Welfare or "animal rights"? Leif Erikson General 0 April 10th 06 06:49 PM
did someone say animal facts? The Admiral General 1 November 18th 04 06:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017