On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.


Sure it is.

Nonsense.

Defending yourself in court is expensive and highly stressful.

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:49:00 PM UTC-4, (unknown) wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:33:55 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

Sure it is. Notice, I specifically stated civil cases in with this.

You also said, "...if a civil suit arises, and the people who sued him
lost, they'd have to pay his costs..." There is no guarantee
whatsoever, that the prevailing party will recover all or ANY of their
defense costs.

This really belongs in another thread, but I believe if it WERE true,
there would be a LOT less frivolous litigation.

Absolutely. Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense, there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor. McDonald's coffee.

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 14:10:52 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 4/10/2012 2:07 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:17:34 -0400, wrote:

In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Having to go to court, whether you are guilty as sin or completely
innocent, is NEVER a wash.

And right now the guy has a hit out on him, it ain't cheap to hide,
'specially when you are hiding from a whole administration and
presidential campaign...

Oh, wow, Hannity couldn't have said it better.

On 10/04/2012 7:39 AM, SunshineStateJim wrote:
On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

They won't get paid if he doesn't get charged.
--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing.

On 10/04/2012 8:17 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In , says...

On 4/10/2012 8:37 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

His lawyers want to be paid?

If it were a wash, why would he need lawyers? Also, if a civil suit
arises, and the people who sued him lost, they'd have to pay his costs.

Unfortunately there are no good men. Zimmerman is a victim.

--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing.

On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.


--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing.

On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...

On 4/10/2012 12:50 PM, wrote:

Also, even when innocent and spending large amounts of money on your defense,
there's still no guarantee that the verdict will come back in your favor.
McDonald's coffee.

That's not as clear as you might think.

http://www.hotcoffeethemovie.com/Default.asp

On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 21:56:12 -0400, JustWait
wrote:

On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...

You have to be the biggest conspiracy theorist in CT. Are you working
with Hannity on this ****?

On 10/04/2012 7:56 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 4/10/2012 9:33 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 10/04/2012 8:57 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article4814189.1595.1334069143835.JavaMail.geo-discussion-
forums@ynuu20, says...

On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 8:37:53 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
Start a website for the sole purpose of raising money for his
defense if
he is indeed the innocent person that the media is wrongfully working
over, according to FOX?

So last week your stance was that an innocent person should defend
themselves vigorously in the face of an attack.

Yes, I did.

Now you say if a person is indeed innocent, they shouldn't defend
themselves?

No, I never said that.

You are very confused. Or a flip-flopper.

No, because I never said that.

In any case, of course he's entitled to a defense. Even the guilty
are in our courts. Unless you believe he should be summarily
railroaded.

Ever hear of a public defender?

You don't get one until you are charged.



His lawyers just walked away tonight. I guess they got the message from
Holder and the Injustice dept not going after the new black panther
terrorists, and they don't want to live the rest of their lives like
Zimmerman and his parents are gonna' have to, on the run...

On a rent-a-cop salary I doubt he can afford the lawyers. And without
charges, no money in it. Then the Black Panthers called them up, LE did
nothing, so might as well quit to live another day.

Watched a few videos on Black Panthers on YouTube, pretty obvious who
the racists really are. On the bigger picture, looks like race riots
for free TVs could erupt.

--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing.